An affidavit of contest against a desert- land entry, in which it is alleged that the entryman "has failed to make yearly proof for the first year as required by law," states a sufficient cause of action........
In case of a contest against a timber- culture entry on the ground of failure to plant the acreage required by law, the en- tryman may, prior to the trial, relinquish part of his entry and retain the remainder, if his compliance with law is such as to entitle him to patent for the unrelinquished tract..
Where a woman makes an application for homestead entry as a deserted wife, and subsequently procures a divorce on the ground of desertion, and entry upon her application is afterward allowed, in a con- test against such entry, on the ground of fraud and collusion, the Department is not bound by the finding of fact made by the court in the divorce proceeding, but may determine from the proof whether or not she was a deserted wife at the time of her application......
The preferred right of entry accorded a contestant is not a vested right until he has "contested, paid the land-office fees, and procured the cancellation" of the entry attacked......
Section 2 of the act of May 14, 1880, giving a preference right of entry to a successful contestant, does not extend to contests against Indian allotments..
A desert-land entry made under the act of March 3, 1877, but not completed, by final proof, until after the passage of the amenda- tory act of March 3, 1891, is governed, so far as the price to be paid for the land entered is concerned, by the law in force at the time the entry was made......
The affidavit of the assignee of a desert- land entry required by the regulations must be sworn to before one of the officers of the local land office, a United States com- missioner, or a judge or clerk of a court of record in the county wherein the land in question is situated; and where such affida- vit is executed before an officer other than those enumerated, the assignment will not be recognized
An entry or selection of public lands which is not so far perfected as to confer an equitable title or vested right does not take the land included therein out of the operation of the mining laws; but, ordina- rily, where an entry or selection of public lands is received and recognized by the local officers, it will, while pending, prevent the receipt or recognition of other applications for the same land until such entry or selec- tion is disposed of ................... Fees.
The practice respecting the commissions to be paid the register and receiver in the administration of the acts of March 2, 1889, and August 15, 1894. relating to the disposi- tion of lands in the late Sioux Indian Res- ervation, in case of the commutation of an entry, adhered to...... Final Proof.
Circular of March 26, 1902, under act of March 11, 1902, relative to officers before whom affidavits, proofs, and oaths may be made....
Forest Lands.
See Reservation.
In an exchange of public lands in Hawaii, under the Hawaiian laws, for lands of pri- vate ownership, the title should be taken to the Territory if the land thus acquired is for uses of local government, but if for other than local public uses the conveyance should be to the United States...
The proviso in section 55 of the act of April 30, 1900, limiting the amount of real estate which any corporation operating in the Territory of Hawaii may acquire and hold therein to 1,000 acres, precludes an ex- change of lands owned by any such corpo- ration for a quantity of public lands in said Territory aggregating more than 1,000
The authority conferred by section 169 of the civil laws of Hawaii upon the Territorial
officers to lease, sell, or otherwise dispose of the public lands of said Territory includes authority to grant an easement upon, over, and across them for the purpose of con- structing, maintaining, and operating all works necessary to supply water for irri- gating lands, developing power, and for domestic purposes; and by sections 186 and 193 of said civil laws said officers are ex- pressly authorized to grant a right to use earth, rock, and timber upon adjacent pub- lic lands for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and repairing such improve- ments. The power to make such grants for the purposes named being conferred upon the officers of the Territory by the local laws, which Congress by express direction has continued in force, and the power in no way depending upon the action of the Department of the Interior, it is not neces- sary that an application for the exercise thereof should be approved by the Secre- tary
Homestead.
See Oklahoma Lands.
Circular of October 25, 1902, under act of June 17, 1902, relative to homestead entries on lands temporarily withdrawn for irriga- tion purposes.
One owning 160 acres of land in his own right, and also holding the title to other land in trust for another without any bene- ficial interest in himself, is not for that rea- son disqualified to make entry under the general provisions of the homestead law... 166 In determining priorities of claims in a controversy arising upon the filing by a railroad company of a list of selections reg- ular in form upon the day the plat of sur- vey of the township in which the selected lands are situated was officially filed, and the presentation, on the same day, of home- stead applications for said lands, the actual time of the presentation of the claims will be recognized
An application to purchase under section 2 of the act of June 15, 1880, will not be allowed in the absence of an affidavit show- ing the nonmineral character of the land applied for and that no prosecution or pro- eeeding has been had against the applicant on account of any trespass committed or material taken from any of the public lands subsequent to March 1, 1879.
Where a homestead entryman who has declared his intention of becoming a citizen dies, after the submission of final proof, without having been admitted to citizen- ship, but having complied with the law in all other respects except as to the submis.. sion of proof within the statutory period, the entry may be equitably confirmed for
the benefit of the heirs who are citizens and patent issue in their names
The act of May 17, 1900, known as the free homestead act, operated to abrogate the general rule recognized in departmental practice, that requires payment to be made for the excess area embraced in homestead entries containing more than 160 acres, in so far as such rule, prior to the passage of said act, affected the entry of lands desig- nated therein.....
The widow of an honorably discharged soldier, who made homestead entry in her own right as the head of a family, for less than one hundred and sixty acres of land, is, under section 2 of the act of June 8, 1872, as amended by the act of March 3, 1875, en- titled to make an additional entry of so much land as, when added to the quantity previously entered, shall not exceed one hundred and sixty acres
A homestead entryman who failed to per- fect title under his entry, and thereafter made a second entry under the act of March 2, 1889, which second entry was also not perfected, but "lost or forfeited," was by the act of June 5, 1900, restored to the status of a qualified homestead claimant and became entitled to the benefits of the homestead laws as though the second entry had not been made..
A married woman is not disqualified to make additional entry under section 5 of the act of March 2, 1889, where prior to the passage of said act, and when possessing the necessary qualifications, she made her original entry and submitted final proof thereon showing due compliance with law. 129
Circular of June 19, 1902, under act of May 22, 1902, with respect to commutation of and second homestead entries
In the commutation of homestead entries constructive residence from the date of the entry will be recognized where settlement is made and residence established within six months thereafter..
All persons who have acquired title to a homestead by commutation, whether under the provision of section 2301 of the Revised Statutes or under any one of the special acts relating to Oklahoma lands, are, if other- wise qualified, entitled to enter a home- stead of the Comanche, Kiowa, and Apache lands
SOLDIERS' ADDITIONAL.
A soldier's additional right of entry is not dependent upon consummation of the origi- nal entry
A soldier entitled to the benefits of sec- tion 2303 of the Revised Statutes does not by the making of an invalid adjoining farm entry, as additional to his original
The provisions in section 2305, R. S., with respect to soldiers "discharged on account of wounds received or disability incurred in the line of duty," were made solely with respect to the credit that should be allowed a soldier for his military service in comput- ing the period of his residence under an original entry, and in no way can be in- voked as bearing upon the qualifications of an applicant under section 2306, whose status in that respect must be determined under limitations found in section 2304.... 165 The filing of a soldier's declaratory state- ment is not the equivalent of an entry, within the meaning of section 2306 of the Revised Statutes, granting the right to make a soldier's additional homestead entry to persons "who may have heretofore entered under the homestead laws less than one hundred and sixty acres of land"
One entitled under section 2 of the act of March 2, 1889, to make a second homestead entry for 160 acres, does not, by an entry under said act for a less area, affect his right to make a soldier's additional homestead entry under section 2306, Revised Statutes, where the aggregate of both entries does not exceed such quantity
Where part of a homestead entry is can- celed for conflict with a prior railroad grant, and the entryman thereupon elects to relinquish his entire entry, with the privilege of making a new entry elsewhere, there is no basis for a soldier's additional right, no part of the entryman's homestead right having been exhausted.
The widow of a soldier who made home- stead entry in her own right, prior to the adoption of the Revised Statutes, for less than 160 acres of land, is, by virtue of the provisions of sections 2306 and 2307 of such statutes, entitled to an additional home- stead right, and if she fails to exercise such right it becomes upon her death an asset of her estate, subject to distribution as other personal property
The wife of an insane soldier, who makes homestead entry, as the head of a family, for less than 160 acres of land, is not, upon the death of the soldier, entitled, as his widow, to a soldier's additional homestead right based upon such entry
On the failure of a soldier to exercise his additional homestead right under section 2306, Revised Statutes, during his lifetime, it may, under section 2307 of such statutes, be appropriated by his widow, during her
Page life and widowhood, or, in the event of her death without appropriating it, by the sol- dier's minor orphan children, during their minority, through a guardian duly ap pointed and officially accredited at the Department of the Interior; and in in- stances where it is not so appropriated, the estate of the soldier is not divested there- of.......
The regulation of the land department requiring assignment of soldiers' additional rights to be acknowledged, is a mere rule of evidence, and not a rule of law fixing what acts are essential to a valid assign- ment of such rights...
Where a party sells his right to make sol- diers' additional entry, and executes and delivers an absolute assignment therefor, he has no right, by reason of the default of the purchaser to pay the price agreed upon for such assignment, which he can enforce against an innocent purchaser who pur- chased the right upon the faith of such assignment..
A duplicate certificate of soldiers' addi- tional right, regularly issued, which does not indicate that it is a duplicate, purchased in good faith before the right had been ex- hausted, and in the hands of a bona fide purchaser, unsatisfied, at the time of the passage of the act of August 18, 1894, was by that act validated and made a certified right, which could thereafter be lawfully transferred, irrespective of the transferee's knowledge that the soldier's additional right had, prior to his purchase of the duplicate, been exercised through the use of the original certificate..
Where it appears that a party has been given a mere power to locate a soldier's cer- tificate of right to make additional entry. uncoupled with any interest therein, it is unnecessary for the present holder of such certificate, upon applying to locate the same, to furnish the affidavit of such party showing whether or not he now has any interest in the certificate.
No good reason exists for requiring the personal presentation of an application to make soldiers' additional entry, by either the soldier or his assignee, and if the proofs submitted in support thereof establish the material facts necessary to the existence of the right in the applicant, and the char acter of the land sought to be entered, they are sufficient, even though executed before some officer authorized to administer oaths outside of the land district in which the land sought to be entered is situate. Proof as to the character of the land may be made by any credible person having the requisite personal knowledge of the premises
The limitation in the last proviso to see- tion 1 of the act of May 14, 1898, relating to entries of public lands in the district of Alaska. "that no homestead shall exceed 80 acres in extent," applies to the acreage
Page that may be included in a single home- stead entry, and does not limit the number of entries that may be made by an assignee of several soldiers' additional rights under section 2306, Revised Statutes.
Indemnity.
See Railroad Grant; School Land.
Indian Lands.
See Mineral Land; Mining Claim.
Instructions of July 21, 1902, relative to settlers on Navajo Reservation, under act of July 1, 1902
Circular of July 25, 1902, relative to lands in former Ute Reservation subject to home- stead entry, under act of June 13, 1902. Circular of July 29, 1902, relative to sale of Umatilla Reservation lands (Oregon), under act of July 1, 1902 ....
The guardianship and control of the United States over the Indians continues after their lands have been allotted to them in severalty and after they have become citizens of the United States, and the Gov- ernment has full authority to use military force to eject intruders from the allotments of the Indians...
Indian wives of Indians who have entered lands under the provisions of the home- stead laws are not entitled to allotments under the fourth section of the act of Feb- ruary 8, 1887, whether the marriage took place prior or subsequent to the act of August 9, 1888 ...
Instructions of September 6, 1901, con- cerning commissions on agricultural Chip- pewa lands commuted under the act of January 26, 1901
All moneys accruing from the disposal of agricultural Chippewa lands under the pro- visions of the acts of January 14, 1889, and January 26, 1901, either for excess acreage or on commuted entries, should be depos- ited to the credit of the Chippewa Indians. 72 The register and receiver are not entitled to commissions upon such moneys either payable therefrom or out of the public moneys of the United States; but under the third paragraph of section 2238 of the Re- vised Statutes they are entitled to the com- missions therein specified upon the price of the land embraced in entries, as excess acreage, and land involved in commuted entries, the same to be paid by the entry-
thereon are entitled to the proceeds of dead timber taken therefrom under said act .... 315 Under article 3 of the agreement with the Shoshone and Bannock Indians, and the act of June 6, 1900, ratifying and con- firming said agreement, each member of a family of said Indians occupying and culti vating, under the sixth section of the treaty of July 3, 1868, any portion of the lands ceded by said act of June 6, 1900, is entitled to an allotment thereunder, restricted to the lands occupied at the date of agreement, not exceeding 320 acres for any one family. 146 The right of dissent accorded by section 5 of the act of February 18, 1888, from the statutory allowance to the tribe or nation provided for by said act on account of right of way granted, is limited to a dissent by the general council of either the nation or tribe named, and there is no authority for the acceptance of a dissent by the principal. chief of such nation or tribe; nor is the De- partment of the Interior authorized to ex- tend the time within which such dissent may be certified..
The acts of June 5, 1872, and February 11, 1874, constitute the only authority for the disposal of lands in the fifteen townships in the Bitter Root Valley opened to settlement by the act of June 5, 1872, and said acts spe- cifically provide for their disposal to actual settlers only; hence said lands are not sub- ject to entry under the timber and stone act....
The provisions in the act of March 2, 1889, limiting the disposal of lands within the ceded portion of the Great Sioux Indian Reservation to actual settlers under the pro- visions of the homestead law and the laws relating to town sites, does not reserve said lands from the operation of the act of Jan- uary 13, 1897, authorizing the use of public lands for reservoir purposes
In view of the fact that the practice, in the administration of the acts of March 2, 1889, and August 15, 1894, relating to the dis- position of lands in the late Sioux Indian reservations, respecting the commissions to be paid the register and receiver by the entryman, under the act of March 2, where he commutes his entry, and of requiring no commission on the commutation of an entry made under the act of August 15, is of long standing and has been uniformly adhered to, and that the administration of both these acts is now largely completed, no change in such practice will be made...... 250
stance where the Secretary making the ruling, or rendering the decision, if still holding the office, would be in duty bound to review or reverse his own act.......
Land Department.
The acts of the heads of the several de- partments of the Government in relation to matters which appertain to their respective duties are, in legal effect, the acts of the Executive....
The Land Department has authority to make such rules and regulations, not in- consistent with law, as may be necessary or appropriate to secure the effective and con- venient administration of any law which falls within its jurisdiction.......
The action of the local land officers upon questions of law or fact respecting the dis- posal of the public lands does not conclude their superior officers or the Government. Such action is in all cases reviewable by the Commissioner of the General Land Office and by the Secretary of the Interior as the proper administration of the law or the de- mands of justice may require.....
Lieu Selection.
See Reservation, subtitle Forest Lands; School Lands.
Married Woman.
See Homestead.
Mineral Land.
See Railroad Grant.
Coal lands are mineral lands within the meaning, generally of the laws relating to the public lands.
Lands containing deposits of ordinary brick clay are not mineral lands within the meaning of the mining laws, though more valuable for such deposits than for agricul- tural purposes..........
Lands which have been allotted to In- dians, or to which a homestead entryman has acquired fixed and vested rights by rea- son of his compliance with the homestead laws, are not subject to the mining laws or to mineral exploration and entry
Lands not known to contain valuable mineral deposits at the time when, in the absence of such knowledge, the tights of an Indian allottee or of a homestead or town- site entryman become fixed and vested are not thereafter subject to exploration, loca- tion, or entry by other parties under the mining laws....
Rights once vested in an allottee, or in an entryman under the homestead or town-site laws, or in a town-lot purchaser, can not be affected by the subsequent exploration or location of the lands for minerals.......................... 154 In order to except mineral land from the operation of a town-site or other entry made in pursuance of law, the land must be known, at the time of the entry, to contain
Page. minerals of such character and value as to justify expenditures for the purpose of ex- tracting them
Conditions with respect to the character of land, as they exist at the date of entry, or at the time when all the necessary re- quirements have been complied with by the person seeking title, must determine whether the land is subject to sale or other disposition under the law upon which the application for patent is based, and no change in such conditions, subsequently oc- curring, can impair or in any manner affect the applicant's right to a patent, if in other respects established
When an applicant for public lands under the nonmineral laws has complied with all the terms and conditions necessary to se- cure title to a particular tract of land, he acquires a vested interest therein, if it is then not known to contain mineral deposits and is otherwise of the condition and char- acter subject to disposition under the law under which he seeks title, and thenceforth the mining laws have no application to the land, the applicant is regarded as the equi- table owner, the Government holds the legal title in trust for him, and no subse- quent discovery of mineral in the land, or other change in its condition or character, can impair or in any manner affect his right or title..
Directions given that in all nonmineral entries of lands in the States of Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Florida the same nonmineral affidavit be required, before the entry is permitted to go of record, as is required in other States to which the min- ing laws are applicable.........
Mining Claim.
See Oklahoma Lands.
Revised circular of rules and regulations, July 26, 1901 ..
An entry or selection of public lands which is not so far perfected as to confer an equitable title or vested right does not take the land included therein out of the opera- tion of the mining laws
There is no authority in the mining laws for the issue of two patents for the same mineral land, the patent to one claimant to embrace only the surface land and the pat- ent to another to embrace only the veins or lodes beneath the surface; nor is it within the contemplation of said laws that vein or lode deposits may be claimed, located, and patented independently of the surface ground connected with and containing or overlying them......
From the time of the passage of the act of June 6, 1900, the body of lands which were to be allotted or opened to settlement there- under were subjected to the mining laws, and to mineral exploration and entry, so
« PreviousContinue » |