Criminal Law and ProcedureWest Publishing Company, 1994 - 809 pages Covering legal, procedural, and Constitutional issues, this textbook presents case examples, describes the history of criminal law, and outlines recent developments in criminal justice. Chapters cover the legal foundations of criminal justice, the substantive criminal law, and law enforcement and criminal procedure. The book includes excerpts from court decisions, including rulings from state cases, federal cases, and the Supreme Court. The book is intended for use in criminology, criminal justice, pre-law, political science, and paralegal courses. John M. Scheb is a senior judge for the Florida Court System and a lecturer at Stetson University College of Law; John M. Scheb II teaches political science at the University of Tennessee. c. Book News Inc. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 91
Page 274
... prove each one of the following elements by proof beyond a reasonable doubt . First . That the Defendant knowingly ... prove that the waste disposed of was listed or identified or characterized by the E.P.A. as a hazardous waste , the ...
... prove each one of the following elements by proof beyond a reasonable doubt . First . That the Defendant knowingly ... prove that the waste disposed of was listed or identified or characterized by the E.P.A. as a hazardous waste , the ...
Page 314
... prove that the defendant's false statement was made " willfully and corruptly , " because at common law perjury was a specific - intent crime . Requiring the prosecution to prove the defendant's specific intent generally eliminates the ...
... prove that the defendant's false statement was made " willfully and corruptly , " because at common law perjury was a specific - intent crime . Requiring the prosecution to prove the defendant's specific intent generally eliminates the ...
Page 373
... prove insanity and the United States Congress ' power to require defendant to prove insanity . The United States Constitution does not draw meaningless distinctions . Therefore , Leland compels a holding that the aspect of the Insanity ...
... prove insanity and the United States Congress ' power to require defendant to prove insanity . The United States Constitution does not draw meaningless distinctions . Therefore , Leland compels a holding that the aspect of the Insanity ...
Contents
Civil and Criminal | 3 |
The Bill of Rights | 11 |
Questions for Thought and Discussion | 18 |
Copyright | |
53 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
actus reus affirmed alcohol appellate court arrest assault attempt battery burglary Chapter charged cocaine commit common law consent conspiracy constitutional conviction Court held Court of Appeals crime criminal law death decision defendant defendant's defined drug enacted establish evidence example exclusionary rule fact false federal felony felony murder Florida force Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment gambling guilty Heter homicide Insanity Defense intoxication involved judge jurisdictions jury Justice kidnapping killing knowingly L.Ed larceny law enforcement manslaughter marijuana mens rea misdemeanor murder obscene offense ordinance pari-mutuel betting Penal Code person police officer possession probable cause prohibit proscribing prosecution protection provides punishment rape reasonable robbery rule S.Ct sexual conduct sexual intercourse sodomy solicitation specific intent statute statutory strict liability Supreme Court testified testimony theft tion trial court U.S. Constitution U.S. Supreme Court United unlawful vagrancy vehicle victim violation warrant