Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 4
... action for damages against the per- son who is responsible for their presence there . Wood Nuis . , § 112 : Cooley ... action . Cooley Torts , supra . The right of action in the present case , therefore , depends upon the fact that the ...
... action for damages against the per- son who is responsible for their presence there . Wood Nuis . , § 112 : Cooley ... action . Cooley Torts , supra . The right of action in the present case , therefore , depends upon the fact that the ...
Page 16
... action taken thereunder , we should set aside an entire ordi- nance legally enacted as to many of the provisions of which no objections are or can be urged . It would be unfortunate in the extreme if such were the only alternative . The ...
... action taken thereunder , we should set aside an entire ordi- nance legally enacted as to many of the provisions of which no objections are or can be urged . It would be unfortunate in the extreme if such were the only alternative . The ...
Page 17
... action ; but the underlying principle of judicial action is the same , and the rule announced includes not only a conceded right to litigate the controverted ques- tion as and when it arises , but also an implication that pend- ing the ...
... action ; but the underlying principle of judicial action is the same , and the rule announced includes not only a conceded right to litigate the controverted ques- tion as and when it arises , but also an implication that pend- ing the ...
Page 29
... action already taken or by which to dictate in advance what such action shall be excepting in cases where the act to be performed is so purely ministerial in character or its performance in any event so specifically prescribed that the ...
... action already taken or by which to dictate in advance what such action shall be excepting in cases where the act to be performed is so purely ministerial in character or its performance in any event so specifically prescribed that the ...
Page 33
... action by him , and that the reversal of such action and the command that he make the specific orders demanded by the relator is not within the province of the writ of mandamus . VOL . LII . 3 N. J. & H. R. Ry . Co. v . FEBRUARY TERM ...
... action by him , and that the reversal of such action and the command that he make the specific orders demanded by the relator is not within the province of the writ of mandamus . VOL . LII . 3 N. J. & H. R. Ry . Co. v . FEBRUARY TERM ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error