Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 6
On error to the Warren Circuit Court . Before GUMMERE , CHIEF JUSTICE , and
Justices VINTURN and TRENCHARD . For the plaintiff in error , Martin P . Devlin .
For the defendant in error , George H . Peirce . The opinion of the court was ...
On error to the Warren Circuit Court . Before GUMMERE , CHIEF JUSTICE , and
Justices VINTURN and TRENCHARD . For the plaintiff in error , Martin P . Devlin .
For the defendant in error , George H . Peirce . The opinion of the court was ...
Page 9
579 ) , was decided by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Veu York Jetal Criling
Co . v . Kiernan , 14 Vroom ... It is further assigned for error that the present
judgment was entered by the plaintiff without notice to the defendant . This
assignment ...
579 ) , was decided by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Veu York Jetal Criling
Co . v . Kiernan , 14 Vroom ... It is further assigned for error that the present
judgment was entered by the plaintiff without notice to the defendant . This
assignment ...
Page 58
... A engaged another person to complete the work , and such person , with men
and horses , went to work - Held , not error ... The defendant insisted that the
contract was to remove all the rubbish and dirt from the defendant ' s premises ,
and ...
... A engaged another person to complete the work , and such person , with men
and horses , went to work - Held , not error ... The defendant insisted that the
contract was to remove all the rubbish and dirt from the defendant ' s premises ,
and ...
Page 93
Each party having succeeded in part and failed in part , no costs will be allowed
either party . THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY , DEFENDANT IN ERROR , V .
WILLIAM BURKE . PLAINTIFF IN ERROR . Argued November 3 , 1910 —
Decided ...
Each party having succeeded in part and failed in part , no costs will be allowed
either party . THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY , DEFENDANT IN ERROR , V .
WILLIAM BURKE . PLAINTIFF IN ERROR . Argued November 3 , 1910 —
Decided ...
Page 153
The award therefore of the amount paid by the defendant by way of installments
under the seco : ad contract was error . Let the judgment be reversed to the end
that a new trial may be had . CITY OF SUMMIT , APPELLANT , V . ALFONSO ...
The award therefore of the amount paid by the defendant by way of installments
under the seco : ad contract was error . Let the judgment be reversed to the end
that a new trial may be had . CITY OF SUMMIT , APPELLANT , V . ALFONSO ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed amendment amount appears application Argued assessment assigned authority BERGEN bond brought building cause charge CHIEF claim condition constitution construction contract cost court was delivered crossing damages defendant in error defendant's determine direction District duty effect election entitled evidence existence express fact feet given ground held hundred injury Insurance interest issue Jersey judge judgment jury JUSTICE land March matter meaning ment mortgage negligence notice objection opinion owner paid Pamph parties passed person plaintiff in error present proceedings proof prosecutor question Railroad Railway reason recover referred refused relator respect result reversed road rule statute street Submitted suit Supreme Court taken testimony tion track train trial VREDENBURGH Vroom witness writ
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81 |
| Author | New Jersey. Supreme Court |
| Publisher | Soney and Sage, 1912 |
| Original from | Harvard University |
| Digitized | 15 May 2008 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |