Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 25
... effect . This provided for the establishment of a District Court in the county of Morris whose jurisdiction should comprise certain parts of that county not including the town of Boonton . On April 6th , 1910 , Oliver K. Kay , Esq ...
... effect . This provided for the establishment of a District Court in the county of Morris whose jurisdiction should comprise certain parts of that county not including the town of Boonton . On April 6th , 1910 , Oliver K. Kay , Esq ...
Page 26
... effect . We conclude , therefore , that the jurisdiction of the justice existed at the time it was assumed in the present case , and hence that the proceedings brought up by the prosecutor should be affirmed . THOMAS A. MATHIS , RELATOR ...
... effect . We conclude , therefore , that the jurisdiction of the justice existed at the time it was assumed in the present case , and hence that the proceedings brought up by the prosecutor should be affirmed . THOMAS A. MATHIS , RELATOR ...
Page 35
... effect , what the protection of the petitioner requires , without involving the power of the Circuit Court to amend this statutory pro- ceeding . In the interest of justice , such a course should be followed rather than one that is ...
... effect , what the protection of the petitioner requires , without involving the power of the Circuit Court to amend this statutory pro- ceeding . In the interest of justice , such a course should be followed rather than one that is ...
Page 39
... of contributory negligence , we think that that circumstance affects neither the interpretation of the company's rule nor its legal effect upon the agency of the con- Rogers v . Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 81 N. J. FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . 39.
... of contributory negligence , we think that that circumstance affects neither the interpretation of the company's rule nor its legal effect upon the agency of the con- Rogers v . Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 81 N. J. FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . 39.
Page 41
... effect . The act of 1907 , as applied to judg- ments recovered ( as this one was ) before its passage , allowed six months from the time the act took effect , for a writ of error . The provisions of this act are substantially the same ...
... effect . The act of 1907 , as applied to judg- ments recovered ( as this one was ) before its passage , allowed six months from the time the act took effect , for a writ of error . The provisions of this act are substantially the same ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error