Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 17
... of which the engine was moved by the defendant while plaintiff was at work -
Held , that the questions of the negligence of the defendant and the contributory
negligence of or the assumption of risk by the plaintiff were properly left to the jury
.
... of which the engine was moved by the defendant while plaintiff was at work -
Held , that the questions of the negligence of the defendant and the contributory
negligence of or the assumption of risk by the plaintiff were properly left to the jury
.
Page 19
The opinion of the court was delivered by GARRISON , J . It was not necessary
for the plaintiff to show that the construction of the defendant ' s machine shop
was per se negligent with reference to the work the plaintiff was set to do therein ,
viz ...
The opinion of the court was delivered by GARRISON , J . It was not necessary
for the plaintiff to show that the construction of the defendant ' s machine shop
was per se negligent with reference to the work the plaintiff was set to do therein ,
viz ...
Page 20
In aid , therefore , of both master and servant , the presumption in favor of the
latter is against the negligence of the former ; so that the servant is not , as matter
of law , required to neglect his own duty in order to assure himself that the master
is ...
In aid , therefore , of both master and servant , the presumption in favor of the
latter is against the negligence of the former ; so that the servant is not , as matter
of law , required to neglect his own duty in order to assure himself that the master
is ...
Page 38
Assuming that this means that his negligence was such as to bar his right of
recovery against the company , the question arises whether the authority of the
conductor under the printed instructions extends to cases of accidents for which
the ...
Assuming that this means that his negligence was such as to bar his right of
recovery against the company , the question arises whether the authority of the
conductor under the printed instructions extends to cases of accidents for which
the ...
Page 40
We may say , however , in conclusion , that the existence of contributory
negligence , if determined by the court as a judge , was not justified by legal rules
, and if found by the court as a jury was not supported by any testimony The sole
...
We may say , however , in conclusion , that the existence of contributory
negligence , if determined by the court as a judge , was not justified by legal rules
, and if found by the court as a jury was not supported by any testimony The sole
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed amendment amount appears application Argued assessment assigned authority BERGEN bond brought building cause charge CHIEF claim condition constitution construction contract cost court was delivered crossing damages defendant in error defendant's determine direction District duty effect election entitled evidence existence express fact feet given ground held hundred injury Insurance interest issue Jersey judge judgment jury JUSTICE land March matter meaning ment mortgage negligence notice objection opinion owner paid Pamph parties passed person plaintiff in error present proceedings proof prosecutor question Railroad Railway reason recover referred refused relator respect result reversed road rule statute street Submitted suit Supreme Court taken testimony tion track train trial VREDENBURGH Vroom witness writ