Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81Soney and Sage, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 17
... negligence of the defendant and the con- tributory negligence of or the assumption of risk by the plaintiff were properly left to the jury . On rule to show cause . VOL . LII . Goessel v . Central R. R. of N. J. 81 FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 .
... negligence of the defendant and the con- tributory negligence of or the assumption of risk by the plaintiff were properly left to the jury . On rule to show cause . VOL . LII . Goessel v . Central R. R. of N. J. 81 FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 .
Page 19
... negligent with reference to the work the plaintiff was set to do therein , viz . , to wipe a locomotive that was to be ... negligence , with which the plaintiff's assumption of obvious risk is somewhat con- founded in the argument , is ...
... negligent with reference to the work the plaintiff was set to do therein , viz . , to wipe a locomotive that was to be ... negligence , with which the plaintiff's assumption of obvious risk is somewhat con- founded in the argument , is ...
Page 20
... negligence of the former ; so that the servant is not , as matter of law , re- quired to neglect his own duty in order to assure himself that the master is performing his . An apt illustration is Daum v . North Jersey Street Railway Co ...
... negligence of the former ; so that the servant is not , as matter of law , re- quired to neglect his own duty in order to assure himself that the master is performing his . An apt illustration is Daum v . North Jersey Street Railway Co ...
Page 38
... negligence . Assuming that this means that his negligence was such as to bar his right of recovery against the company , the question arises whether the authority of the con- ductor under the printed instructions extends to cases of ac ...
... negligence . Assuming that this means that his negligence was such as to bar his right of recovery against the company , the question arises whether the authority of the con- ductor under the printed instructions extends to cases of ac ...
Page 39
... negligence , we think that that circumstance affects neither the interpretation of the company's rule nor its legal effect upon the agency of the con- Rogers v . Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 81 N. J. FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . 39.
... negligence , we think that that circumstance affects neither the interpretation of the company's rule nor its legal effect upon the agency of the con- Rogers v . Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 81 N. J. FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . 39.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1911-Decided June 44 Vroom 52 Vroom action affirmed alleged amendment amount appears application assessment assigned Atlantic City BERGEN BOGERT bond cause Central Railroad certiorari charge CHIEF JUSTICE claim condition CONGDON construction contract contributory negligence council court was delivered crossing damages declaration defendant in error defendant's demurrer District Court duty election entitled Erie Railroad Co evidence fact feet fendant ground held injury Insurance Jersey City judgment jury land legislative legislature liability March 23 ment MINTURN mortgage Newark nonsuit notice objection opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad person plaintiff in error plea present proof prosecutor Public Service Railway question railroad company Railway reason recover refused road statute street Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony thereof tion track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH West Jersey writ of error