Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
A party desiring to take advantage of such a defect in the proceeding should do
so by applying to set aside the referee ' s ... upon that ground , was raised at the
time the reference was ordered , or during the proceedings before the referee .
A party desiring to take advantage of such a defect in the proceeding should do
so by applying to set aside the referee ' s ... upon that ground , was raised at the
time the reference was ordered , or during the proceedings before the referee .
Page 17
... the premature bringing of this proceeding and the too sweeping scope of the
judgment required under it . The writ of certiorari is dismissed , with costs .
CHARLES GOESSEL V . CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY Submitted
December ...
... the premature bringing of this proceeding and the too sweeping scope of the
judgment required under it . The writ of certiorari is dismissed , with costs .
CHARLES GOESSEL V . CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY Submitted
December ...
Page 23
The opinion of the court was delivered by GARRISON , J . This writ brings up the
proceedings had before a justice of the peace under the Landlord and Tenant - -
- - Ilopkins v . Lyon . 81 FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . HETTIE A. HOPKINS ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GARRISON , J . This writ brings up the
proceedings had before a justice of the peace under the Landlord and Tenant - -
- - Ilopkins v . Lyon . 81 FEBRUARY TERM , 1911 . HETTIE A. HOPKINS ET AL.
Page 24
The sole reason for reversal is as follows : " Because the said justice of the peace
had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause , because , at the time said
proceedings were commenced , there was a District Court in the county of Morris
...
The sole reason for reversal is as follows : " Because the said justice of the peace
had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause , because , at the time said
proceedings were commenced , there was a District Court in the county of Morris
...
Page 25
If the justice acquired jurisdiction on April 13th the present proceeding must stand
. He did acquire jurisdiction unless at that time a District Court had been
established by law in Morris county . A judge had been appointed but had not
taken the ...
If the justice acquired jurisdiction on April 13th the present proceeding must stand
. He did acquire jurisdiction unless at that time a District Court had been
established by law in Morris county . A judge had been appointed but had not
taken the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed amendment amount appears application Argued assessment assigned authority BERGEN bond brought building cause charge CHIEF claim condition constitution construction contract cost court was delivered crossing damages defendant in error defendant's determine direction District duty effect election entitled evidence existence express fact feet given ground held hundred injury Insurance interest issue Jersey judge judgment jury JUSTICE land March matter meaning ment mortgage negligence notice objection opinion owner paid Pamph parties passed person plaintiff in error present proceedings proof prosecutor question Railroad Railway reason recover referred refused relator respect result reversed road rule statute street Submitted suit Supreme Court taken testimony tion track train trial VREDENBURGH Vroom witness writ
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 81 |
| Author | New Jersey. Supreme Court |
| Publisher | Soney and Sage, 1912 |
| Original from | Harvard University |
| Digitized | 15 May 2008 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |