Law of Freight Loss and Damage ClaimsW. C. Brown Company, 1961 - 962 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 292
... responsibility for the damage . However , the shipper eventually made necessary repairs and now has filed claim with us . This is an unusual problem , but we do not believe that our company is responsible for the damage . It is our ...
... responsibility for the damage . However , the shipper eventually made necessary repairs and now has filed claim with us . This is an unusual problem , but we do not believe that our company is responsible for the damage . It is our ...
Page 380
... responsibility of the carrier . In view of the small amount involved , we could drop the matter , but we are hesitant about establishing a precedent which might work to our disfavor if in the future we have a substantial claim as to a ...
... responsibility of the carrier . In view of the small amount involved , we could drop the matter , but we are hesitant about establishing a precedent which might work to our disfavor if in the future we have a substantial claim as to a ...
Page 452
... responsibility imposed by common law . That responsibility is , in handling perishables , to exercise reasonable care . The Carmack Amend- ment of the Interstate Commerce Act did not change but re- iterated that responsibility and must ...
... responsibility imposed by common law . That responsibility is , in handling perishables , to exercise reasonable care . The Carmack Amend- ment of the Interstate Commerce Act did not change but re- iterated that responsibility and must ...
Contents
CHAPTER I | 1 |
Statutory Provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act | 8 |
The Bill of Lading as a Receipt | 20 |
Copyright | |
56 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
accept action actual agent amount appears apply arrival authority basis believed bill of lading carrier cartons caused charges circumstances claim claimant Commission common carrier condition connecting consignee container contents contract cost court decision defendant delay delivered delivery destination determine difference duty effect entitled establish evidence Express fact failure filed forwarder freight freight charges given handling held hold included indicated injury inspection Interstate Commerce invoice involved issued liability limitation loaded loss or damage lost market value matter measure ment merchandise moved nature necessary negligence notice notify occurred original owner package paid party payment person plaintiff possession pounds present Problem protect question Railroad reasonable receipt received recover recovery refused released repairs responsibility result rule shipment shipped shipper tariff transportation unless usually