 But, in truth, the mere relation of the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more care of the servant than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. He is no doubt bound to provide for the safety...  Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota - Page 223by North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Robert Milligan Carothers, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Joseph Coghlan, Edwin James Taylor - 1914Full view - About this book
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1847 - 988 pages
...judgment, information, and belief; but the law does not imply from the mere relation of master and servant an obligation on the part of the master to take more...the servant than he may reasonably be expected to take of himself." («') Neither is the master liable (6) Lt ioirv. Briitou, 4 Campb. 134. v. SAow,... | |
 | Charles Manley Smith - 1852 - 638 pages
...to the present case. But in truth, the mere relation of the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more...than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself, lie is no doubt bound to provide for the safety of his servant, in the course of his employment, to... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1896 - 776 pages
...upon the theory that the servant assumed the ordinary dangers incident to the employment, and that " an obligation on the part of the master to take more...the servant than he may reasonably be expected to take of himself will not be implied." Chief Justice Shaw, in the case of Farwell v. Railroad Corporation,... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell, Thomas Durfee - 1857 - 484 pages
...liability provided such knowledge had appeared. They, however, remarked, that the master was, without doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his servant...the best of his judgment, information and belief. From this and from the dicta and observations scattered through the cases, in which this subject has... | |
 | Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, John Paxton Norman, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1857 - 1036 pages
...servant does not create any implied (a) Priestley v. Fowler, 3 M. & VY. 1. EXCHEQUER KKPORTS. 1856. duty on the part of the master to take more care of the...than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. That decision has been followed by several cases (a), and is now established law, though, I believe,... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1858 - 724 pages
...himself the hazard of an injury which may arise in the course of his business or employment. The master is no doubt bound to provide for the safety of his...the best of his judgment, information and belief. But the servant is not bound to risk his safety in the service of his McMillan v. Saratoga and Washington... | |
 | Charles Manley Smith - 1860 - 622 pages
...to the present case. But, in truth, the mere relation of the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more...information and belief. The servant is not bound to ri>k his safety in the service of his master, and may, if he thinks fit, decline any service in which... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1865 - 566 pages
...the judgment of the Court, says : " The mere relation of the master and the servant never can imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more...than he may reasonably be expected to do of himself. lie is, no doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his servant in the course of his employment, to... | |
 | 1866 - 606 pages
...safely? " The servant there was in fact the person who actually drove the van. He says — "The master is, no doubt, bound to provide for the safety of his...the best of his judgment, information, and belief." Bat he also says — "In truth, the mere relation of the master and servant never can imply an obligation... | |
 | 786 pages
...imply an obligation on the part of the master to take more of the servant than he can be reasonably expected to do of himself. He is, no doubt, bound...the best of his judgment, information, and belief." In Priestly v. Fowler the two servants were engaged in one act of service, so that the question of... | |
| |
