Page images
PDF
EPUB

served; but no patent shall issue to any homestead settler who has not resided upon, improved, and cultivated his homestead for a period of at least one year after he shall have commenced his improvements:" Provided, That in every case in which a settler on the public lands of the United States under the homestead laws died while actually engaged in the Army, Navy, or Marine Corps of the United States as private soldier, officer, seaman, or marine, during the war with Spain or the Philippine insurrection, his widow, if unmarried, or in case of her death or marriage, then his minor orphan children or his or their legal representatives, may proceed forthwith to make final proof upon the land so held by the deceased soldier and settler, and that the death of such soldier while so engaged in the service of the United States shall, in the administration of the homestead laws, be construed to be equivalent to a performance of all requirements as to residence and cultivation for the full period of five years, and shall entitle his widow, if unmarried, or in case of her death or marriage, then his minor orphan children or his or their legal representatives, to make final proof upon and receive Government patent for said land; and that upon proof produced to the officers of the proper local land office by the widow, if unmarried, or in case of her death or marriage, then his minor orphan children or his or their legal representatives, that the applicant for patent is the widow, if unmarried, or in case of her death or marriage, his orphan children or his or their legal representatives, and that such soldier, sailor, or marine died while in the service of the United States as hereinbefore described, the patent for such land shall issue.

Approved, March 1, 1901.

SWAMP LANDS-ACT OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1850.

STATE OF LOUISIANA.

The allowance of an entry under general laws providing for the disposal of the public lands, the final approval thereof for patenting, and the issue of patent thereon, is an adjudication by the land department that the lands entered are of the character and class subject to such entry, and necessarily determines that they had not been previously granted or otherwise appropriated.

Any question as to the character of lands claimed by the State under the swamp land act of September 28, 1850, which lands are covered by patents issued prior to any claim thereto by the State, is subject to inquiry only in the courts and by judicial proceedings.

Secretary Hitchcock to the Commissioner of the General Land Office, (W. V. D.) June 21, 1901. (F. W. C.)

The State of Louisiana has appealed from your office decision of December 26, 1899, adhered to on review February 6, 1901, rejecting its claim under the act of September 28, 1850 (9 Stat., 519), to certain described lands as swamp and overflowed lands within the meaning of that act.

Said act granted to the States then in the Union all the swamp and overflowed lands, made unfit thereby for cultivation, within their limits, which at the time remained unsold. The second section thereof made it the duty of the Secretary of the Interior, as soon as practicable after the passage of the act, to prepare a list of the lands described

and transmit the same to the Governor of the State, and at his request to cause a patent to be issued therefor.

. The State of Louisiana adopted the field notes on file in the surveyorgeneral's office as the basis for adjusting its grant of swamp and overflowed lands, and the surveyor-general of that State regularly reported lists of swamp and overflowed lands in each of the townships in which the lands under consideration lie, but said lists do not include the lands in question.

These lists bear date from October 7, 1850, to December 20, 1872. After the making, and reporting of said lists by the surveyorgeneral, and after March 3, 1857, the United States made disposition of the lands in question, by sale, location, or under homestead entry, and the patent of the United States has long ago issued to those making purchase, location or entry of these lands.

In May and June, 1886, after the patenting of the lands as aforesaid, the State of Louisiana filed in your office certain lists of lands, including those here in question, which it is claimed are swamp and overflowed lands within the meaning of the act of 1850, as shown by the field notes of survey on file.

Your office decision held, in effect, that as the disposal of these lands was after the report by the surveyor-general of lists of swamp and overflowed lands in the townships in which they lie, and prior to the assertion of claim thereto in 1886, the lands were properly disposed of, and by the issue of the patent of the United States to the entryman it was necessarily determined that the lands were not of the character granted to the State by the act of September 28, 1850.

The appeal by the State raises many questions not necessary to be considered in disposing of its claim to these lands.

The allowance of an entry under general laws providing for the disposal of the public lands, the final approval thereof for patenting, and the issue of a patent thereon, is an adjudication by the land department that the lands entered are of the character and class subject to such entry, and necessarily determines that they had not been previously granted or otherwise appropriated.

In the case of Rogers Locomotive Works . Emigrant Co., (164) U. S., 559) the lands involved had been certified to the State under a grant made in aid of the construction of a railroad, and it was held (page 574 of the opinion of the court)—

that when the Secretary of the Interior certified in 1858 that the lands in controversy inured to the State under the railroad act of 1856, he, in effect, decided that they were not embraced by the swamp-land act of 1850.

Under the act of 1850 the determination of what were swamp and overflowed lands was entrusted to the Secretary of the Interior. The lands in question have never been identified as swamp and overflowed lands by the Secretary of the Interior, nor have they been reported by

the surveyor-general of the State, under the plan adopted, as lands shown to be swamp and overflowed by the field notes of survey.

There was no reason, therefore, to notify the State of the adjudication had upon the entries made of these lands; and as patents have long ago issued upon said entries, any further question as to the character of these lands is subject to inquiry only in the courts and by judicial proceedings.

The claim asserted to these lands by the list filed in 1886, after the patenting of the lands, must necessarily be denied.

Your office decision is accordingly affirmed.

INDEX.

Page.

Page.

Abandonment.

See Contest; Residence.

Absence, Leave of.

See Residence.

Adverse Claim.

See Mining Claim.

Alaskan Lands.

See Mining Claim.

Instructions of September 29, 1900, respect-
ing proofs required to be filed with returns
of surveys of homestead claims in Alaska... 285
Instructions of June 27, 1900, under act of
June 6, 1900, relative to acquisition of title
to coal lands in Alaska.....

There is nothing in the act of March 3,
1891, which would preclude one claiming
land in Alaska, under sections 12 to 11 of
said act, from giving a mortgage or creat-
ing a charge or lien upon the property for
the purpose of obtaining money with which
to carry on his business thereon, nor that
would prohibit the giving of an option to
the holder of such mortgage, charge, or lien,
to demand and receive a conveyance of an
undivided interest in the property, after
patent, in lieu of payment of the moneys
due him thereunder; and it would not
affect the case at all if it were shown that
the holder of such mortgage, lien, or option
is an alien.

368

397

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

The Secretary of the Interior has never
been clothed with general jurisdiction of
the public lands in Alaska, his jurisdiction
being limited, under the several acts of
Congress relating to such lands, to the ad-
ministration of the mining laws, the town-
site laws, the right-of-way law, the home-
stead laws, and the sale of land for trade
or manufacture, and he is without author-
ity to lease land in Alaska for propagating
foxes, or to assume the care and control of
land already leased for such purpose ...... 417

[blocks in formation]

Children born of a white man, a citizen
of the United States, and an Indian woman,
his wife, follow the status of the father in
the matter of citizenship, and are therefore
not entitled to allotments under section 4,
act of February 8, 1887, as amended by the
act of February 28, 1891..

Coal Land.

Instructions of June 27, 1900, under act of
June 6, 1900, relative to acquisition of title
to coal lands in Alaska..

The words "the existing mining laws of
the United States" are to be construed, in
legislative enactments, as embracing sec-
tions 2347 to 2352, inclusive, of the Revised
Statutes, commonly known as the coal-land
law, unless an intention to the contrary is
expressed

Coal lands are mineral lands within the
meaning of the act of June 4, 1897, and as
such are subject to entry, when found in
forest reservations, the same as other min-
eral lands within such reservations........

629

410

543

606

368

92

92

Commutation.

See Homestead; Indian Lands.

Confirmation.

See Railroad Lands.

Contest.

Page.

In a contest under section 2 of the act of
May 14, 1880, the contestant must pay the
costs of the contest, including the cost of
testimony taken by deposition on behalf of
the contestee...

The requirement of the act of June 16,
1898, that the affidavit of contest, in a case
where contest is initiated against a settler,
on the ground of abandonment, at a time
when the United States is engaged in war,
must contain an allegation that the alleged
absence of the settler was not due to his
employment in the Army, Navy, or Marine
Corps of the United States, is for the sole
benefit and protection of the settler, and
will be considered to have been waived by
him where he personally appears at the
hearing and makes a general defense to
the charge of abandonment without objec-
tion to the omission from the affidavit of
the required allegation.....

The requirement of the act of June 16,
1898, that the affidavit of contest, in a case
where contest is instituted against a settler,
on the ground of abandonment, at a time
when the United States is engaged in war,
must contain an allegation that the alleged
absence of the settler was not due to his
employment in the Army, Navy, or Marine
Corps of the United States, is for the sole
benefit and protection of the settler, and
will be considered to have been waived by
him where he personally appears at the
hearing and makes a general defense to
the charge of abandonment without specif-
ically objecting to the affidavit because of
the omission therefrom of the required alle-
gation, although he in general terms chal-
lenges its sufficiency

A long period of abandonment on the
part of a homestead entryman having been
shown to exist prior to and at the time of
the outbreak of war, the presumption is
that its continuance during the war was
due to the original cause or intent, and not
to the entryman's employment in the
Army, Navy, or Marine Corps of the United
States...

In determining whether the allegations
in an affidavit of contest are sufficient
under the act of June 16, 1898, the matter to
be considered is whether said affidavit
charges abandonment during a time of war,
and, if it does, then the requirement that it
must also contain the allegation that such
abandonment was not caused by employ-
ment in the military or naval service of the
United States must be observed

11

57

999

294

Contestant.

Page.

Whatever preferred right a contestant
may have on the cancellation of the entry
under attack is defeated by an intervening
proclamation by the President declaring
the establishment of a forest reservation
that includes the land embraced within the
contested entry..

A successful contestant who, in exercis-
ing his preference right, locates a soldiers'
additional homestead certificate upon the
land formerly covered by the contested
entry, and thereafter, under the belief that
the first certificate is defective, locates
another soldiers' additional right upon the
same land, does not thereby waive any
rights secured by the first location................

Deputy Mineral Surveyor.
See Land Department.

Desert Land.
See Entry.

Ditches and Canals.
See Right of Way.

Entry.

See Final Proof.

The desert-land act of March 3, 1891, au-
thorizes the sale and assignment of a desert-
land entry; and such a sale, made by the
guardian of an insane entryman acting un-
der an order of the court in accordance
with local statutes, will be recognized by
the Department

6

61

71

The departmental instructions of April
28, 1899, relating to the reinstatement of cash
entries canceled for supposed conflict with
the Houmas private land grant, do not con-
template that such entries shall be rein-
stated by the land department of its own
motion, and where those having rights un-
der those entries do not assert them, but
allow the lands to be appropriated by others
under the settlement laws, the presumption
arises that they have acquiesced in the can-
cellation of the entries and abandoned any
claim thereunder; and in such cases home-
stead entries for the lands, if the proofs be
satisfactory, should be carried to patent re-
gardless of such former canceled entries... 495
The allowance of an entry under general
laws providing for the disposal of the pub-
lie lands, the final approval thereof for pat-
enting, and the issue of patent thereon, is
an adjudication by the land department
that the lands entered are of the character
and class subject to such entry, and neces-
sarily determines that they had not been
previously granted or otherwise appropri-
ated

[blocks in formation]

626

« PreviousContinue »