Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 78Soney and Sage, 1910 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 92
Page 27
... owners of more than one - half of the lineal frontage of lands along said sewer pre- sented their objections in writing , and that all further pro- ceedings ceased . The stipulation further shows that no further action was taken in ...
... owners of more than one - half of the lineal frontage of lands along said sewer pre- sented their objections in writing , and that all further pro- ceedings ceased . The stipulation further shows that no further action was taken in ...
Page 28
... owners of more than one - half of the lineal frontage of land along said sewer again filed their written objections with the city clerk within the time prescribed by law . 49 Vroom . Coxon v . Trenton . At a 28 NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT .
... owners of more than one - half of the lineal frontage of land along said sewer again filed their written objections with the city clerk within the time prescribed by law . 49 Vroom . Coxon v . Trenton . At a 28 NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT .
Page 30
... owners of property who , by filing their objections under the statute , had held up the action of city council , should have had notice and an opportunity to appear before the board of health when that tribunal had under consideration ...
... owners of property who , by filing their objections under the statute , had held up the action of city council , should have had notice and an opportunity to appear before the board of health when that tribunal had under consideration ...
Page 31
... owners and for the determination of their rights as between them and the city . On appeal . Before Justices GARRISON ... owner of the building who had paid $ 50 which plaintiff credited on his bill . The dangerous condition of the ...
... owners and for the determination of their rights as between them and the city . On appeal . Before Justices GARRISON ... owner of the building who had paid $ 50 which plaintiff credited on his bill . The dangerous condition of the ...
Page 32
... owner and accepting something on account the plaintiff was debarred from recovering the balance from the city . This obviously cannot be so . If the city was liable for the whole bill the circumstance in question does not dis- charge it ...
... owner and accepting something on account the plaintiff was debarred from recovering the balance from the city . This obviously cannot be so . If the city was liable for the whole bill the circumstance in question does not dis- charge it ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1909-Decided June 49 Vroom action Adams Express Co affirmance-THE affirmed alleged appears appointed assessment Atlantic City Attorney-General authority BERGEN BOGERT bond borough Camden certiorari CHANCELLOR charge CHIEF JUSTICE commission commissioners common council CONGDON constitution construction contract corporation court was delivered damages declaration defendant in error defendant's election Erie Railroad Co evidence fact February 28 fendant Florham Park freeholders grant ground held Hoboken indictment inference issue Jersey City judgment jurisdiction jury land legislative legislature Lehigh Valley Railroad ment MINTURN municipality natural oyster beds negligence Newark nonsuit opinion ordinance owner Pamph PARKER party payment person plaintiff in error present primary election prosecutor provides Public Service Railway purpose question railroad company reason REED rule Sooy Oyster statute Street Railway Supreme Court SWAYZE testimony tion township track TRENCHARD trial court trial judge verdict VOORHEES VREDENBURGH wagon West Jersey writ