Page images

operations is here precisely determined by a method which has the sanction of statistical science, and the result is startling, indeed.

The table brings out the fact that in some of the coal fields the fatality rate due to a single group of related causes; that is, fall of coal and roof, slate, etc., is as high, or higher, than the normal fatality rate due to all causes in most of the coal-mining States and Provinces of North America. Even the standard rate, of 15.67 per 10,000, or 1.57 per 1,000, is extremely high, higher, in fact, than the normal fatality rate due to all causes in the United Kingdom, Austria, and Belgium. In the far western coal area the rate has been 34.08 per 10,000, or higher than the fatality rate due to all causes for the whole American coal field. The southern, Pacific coast, and western coal areas all have decidedly higher average rates for this group of causes than the North American coal fields as a whole, while the northeastern, the east central, west central, and eastern sections experienced fatality rates due to fall of coal and roof below the standard, but in the last-named area the rate was very close to the average, so that with the exception of the northeastern and the central sections the fatality rate due to fall of coal and roof, slate, etc., must be considered high, and in some cases extremely high for the entire coal field of North America.

The variations in fatality rates due to fall of coal and roof for the different coal-mining States are, of course, much greater, but they can not be fully discussed here. By reference to Table XXIII of the appendix the facts for each State are made available in the most convenient manner, but the extremely high rates for some of the States may be briefly referred to. In Colorado the rate reached 35.15 per 10,000 out of a total rate, from all causes of accidents, of 55.99, or 62.8 per cent. In New Mexico the fatality rate due to fall of coal and roof was still higher, attaining to 40.18 per 10,000 out of a total rate for all causes of 72.69, or 55.7 per cent. In Utah more favorable conditions prevailed, but the rate reached 21.56 per 10.000 out of a total of 133.25, or 16.2 per cent. These rates admirably illustrate the danger of reasoning exclusively from a percentage distribution of causes; for, while the fatality rate due to fall of coal and roof in ('tah is considerably above the standard (15.67), it is only 16.2 per cent of the deaths from all causes, and thus apparently lower. This apparent contradiction is due to the fact that a very disastrous explosion occurred in ['tah in 1900, which increased the proportion of deaths due to this cause to 73.5 per cent of the whole number. It is evident that for an accurate understanding of the causes of coal-mining casualties, the rate of accidents by cause is required in place of the percentage distribution, but it is equally true that for many practical reasons, particularly such as govern in considerations of pre

ventive measures, the percentage distribution, as emphasizing the actually most important cause, is very useful; in fact, quite indispensable.

The standard fatality rate for the coal fields of North America from shaft accidents or falls into shafts, manways, slopes, etc., was 0.91 per 10,000 employed. This cause is, therefore, apparently not. of great numerical significance, as only 494 deaths were caused in this. manner, although it is safe to assume that a considerable number of these accidents were preventable. The variations in rates in the different coal fields is shown in the following table:



West central.


Standard or average rate



Rate per 10,000 employees.






East central.

Pacific coast.



The range in rates is from 0.53 in the southern coal fields to 1.32 per 10,000 in the northeastern coal area. Of course, the liability to falls into shafts, as has previously been said, is in proportion to the number of employees in mines with vertical shaft entrance, and the proportion of such accidents is naturally lowest in coal fields with flat seams above sea level entered by tunnels, drifts, or slopes. The term "shaft accidents," it should be explained, is not one of precise meaning in some of the mine inspectors' reports, and it is not clear whether deaths due to objects falling into shafts have always been included (as they should have been) or whether they have been grouped under miscellaneous. The importance of this suggestion is made clear by reference to Table XXIII of the appendix, in which the details are given for the State of Illinois. In that table it is shown that there were 46 deaths due to employees falling into shafts, equivalent to a rate of 0.87 per 10,000; 53 deaths due to objects falling into shafts, equivalent to a rate of 1 per 10,000; 13 deaths due to falling of other miscellaneous objects, or 0.25 per 10,000; and, finally, 47 deaths due to cage accidents, or 0.89 per 10,000. When these four groups are combined, it is brought out that shaft accidents proper caused 159 fatalities, or nearly as many as mine cars, which caused 175 deaths. Calculated upon the basis of every 10,000 persons employed, the fatality rate for Illinois due to all shaft accidents was 3.01 per 10,000,

62717°-No. 90—10— -3

which contrasts with an average for the coal fields of North America of 0.91. But the excessive shaft accident rate for Illinois is by no means an exception. In Indiana the combined rate was 2.87, for Oklahoma 3.11, for Iowa 2.18, for Nova Scotia 2.64, and for Washington 3.99 per 10,000. Accidents of this kind constitute, therefore, quite an important factor in the fatality rates of certain States, and it may be assumed that if the returns were everywhere accurate and complete the true fatality rates due to shaft and cage accidents of all kinds would be higher than the rates as officially returned and given in the above table and in Table XXIII of the appendix. (a)

Mine cars caused 2,204 fatal accidents in the North American coal fields during the decade ending with 1908, out of a total of 18,346 accidents from all causes. The standard or average fatality rate due to mine cars was 4.04 per 10,000 employees, but the rates vary considerably in the different coal areas, as shown by the following table:


West central.
East central.



Standard or average rate



Pacific coast..

[blocks in formation]

The mine car fatality rate ranges from a minimum of 2.05 per 10,000 for the west-central section to 8.01 per 10,000 for the Pacific coast section. Mine equipment, of course, has a bearing upon the degree of accident occurrence, but how far this is the case can not be determined by the brief account rendered in most of the official reports on accidents of this class. Riding on loaded cars contrary to orders is probably one of the chief reasons for the difference, and another probable reason is in the better discipline and control of mine labor in the Eastern States compared with the South and West.

Among the States and Provinces, with rates of mine car fatalities much above the average, reference may be made to British Columbia with a rate of 7.63; Colorado, 7.01; Oklahoma, 7.26; Utah, 8.33; Washington, 8.37; and West Virginia, 6.18 per 10,000.

See also the Report of the Committee appointed by the Royal Commission on Mines to Inquire into the Causes of and Means of Preventing Accidents from Falls of Ground, Underground Haulage and in Shafts; Parliamentary paper Cd. 4821, London, 1909.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]


Outside car accidents caused 470 deaths in coal-mining operations in North America during the period under consideration, or 2.6 per cent of the fatalities due to all causes. In proportion to the number employed the standard or average fatality rate due to this cause was 0.86 per 10,000. Since practically all of these accidents occur to outside employees they should perhaps have been calculated with reference to outside employments only, but the necessary information as to the number of outside employees is not available for the North American coal fields as a whole. The statistics for Pennsylvania prove conclusively that most of the fatalities due to outside cars have occurred to outside employees. As brought out in the subsequent discussion of the fatal accident rate by occupations, the rate of outside car accidents to underground employees in Pennsylvania was 6.3 per 10,000 for the anthracite coal field and 3.9 per 10,000 for the bituminous coal field. In the anthracite coal fields 38.2 per cent of outside accidents were due to outside cars, and in the bituminous coal field 45.9 per cent.

The term "outside cars," as used in mining statistics, is, however, of a rather indefinite meaning, at least for some of the coal areas, and there are strong reasons to believe that in some of the States this class of accidents is combined with "mine car" accidents, which have been previously discussed. Most of the outside car accidents in the consolidated table have been reported from Pennsylvania and the eastcentral section, and it is, therefore, very doubtful whether the rates for other coal fields and coal-mining States can be accepted as accurate. For some of the States no outside accidents at all have been separately returned, although it is a practical certainty that such accidents have occurred. For this reason a discussion of the fatality rates by States would obviously be of no practical value. It may be emphasized here, however, that the risk factor due to outside cars is, undoubtedly, one which demands serious consideration.


Motors caused a total of 30 fatal accidents in the coal fields of North America during the period under consideration, or 0.2 per cent of the casualties due to all causes. The standard or average fatality rate due to motors was 0.05 per 10,000 employed, the rate having been highest in the western section, where it reached 0.14 per 10,000, and zero in the west central section, for which no fatalities of this kind were officially reported. It is very doubtful whether all the fatal accidents due to motors used in mines have been properly classified as such, and it may reasonably be supposed, considering the rapid increase in the use of electric motor power in mining, that more deaths have occurred than have been officially reported, or properly

classified. Granting probable defects in the returns, it is surprising to find that the fatality rate due to motors should be as low as 0.06 per 10,000 in the eastern coal field, which comprehends the States of Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. In Illinois, for illustration, out of 1,391 fatal accidents only 4, or 0.08 per 10,000 employed, were officially ascribed to motors, while in Ohio 19 out of 1,0:27, or 0.17 per 10,000 employed, were attributed to this cause. No deaths due to motors were officially reported as having occurred in the coal mines of Pennsylvania, which, no doubt, is partly due to errors in classification. For these reasons, it would serve no practical purpose to discuss the fatality rates due to motors in the different coal areas and coal mining States, but the self-evident defect in coal mining statistics clearly brings out the necessity of a uniform classification of causes to be agreed upon by the mining officials of the different States.

EXPLOSIONS OF GAS OR DUST. Statistical defects are inherent in all classification, but they can be materially reduced by a critical examination of individual returns. Of no group of causes is this more true than of gas and dust explosions, explosions of dynamite and powder, blasts, etc. There are practical difficulties to be overcome which at times will baffle even the most skilled, for cause and effect will often be confused, and it will occasionally occur that the true but insignificant cause of a coalmining accident is overshadowed by the disastrous effect. A can of powder explodes and results in a subsequent gas and dust esplosion with a considerable loss of life. Should such an explosion be classified under explosives or explosions? Or, a naked light ignites fire damp and causes a small gas explosion, which results in the explosion of an underground powder magazine, with disastrous results to life. Should such an accident be classified as gas explosion, or as a powder explosion? A compromise is necessary in such cases, but it would be of great value if definite rules governed in the statistical classification. It is due to these differences in the determination of the true cause that so many apparent errors and contradictions occur in coal-mining accident statistics and without a definite understanding among the different mine officials, a decided improvement can not be expected for many years to come.

As classified in Table XXIII of the appendix, there have been 2.571 fatal accidents due to gas and dust explosions in the coal fields of North America during the period under consideration, or 14 per cent of the fatalities due to all causes. The standard or average rate of accident frequency was 4.71 per 10,000, against 4.04 for mine cars and 1.77 for deaths due to explosions of powder or dynamite. Gas and dust explosions, therefore, are among the most important causes of mining

« PreviousContinue »