Conduct of Harry E. Claiborne, U.S. District Judge, District of Nevada: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, on H. Res. 461 ... June 19, 1986, Volume 4
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 157 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accountant adopted agreed alleged appear appointment argued articles of impeachment attorney authority believe CATEs Chairman charged Claiborne's committee concluding conduct CONG CONGRESS Constitution Convention conviction counsel count course court crimes and misdemeanors criminal debate defendant denied District duties English evidence executive fact Federal judge filed GOODMAN Government grand jury grounds guilty hearing HENDRICKS high crimes Hoffman House impeachment included income indictment inquiry intended involved issue James Judge Claiborne judicial Judiciary jury Justice KASTENMEIER KINDNESS legislature LIBRARY LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limited March matter MAZZOLI means ment MOORHEAD motion ninth circuit offenses particular person position practice prepared present President proceedings punishment question reach received record referred relating removal reported Representatives request resolution respect responsibility Senate sentence standard suggested tax returns term testimony Thank tion treason trial United violation vote witness Wright
Page 6 - No evidence or testimony taken in executive session may be released or used in public sessions without the consent of the committee.
Page 68 - Commentary Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. He must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. He must therefore accept restrictions on his conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly.
Page 139 - States, having been guilty of a high misdemeanor, entirely inconsistent with his public trust and duty as a Senator, be, and he hereby is, expelled from the Senate of the United States.
Page 108 - Why recourse was had to assassination in wch. he was not only deprived of his life but of the opportunity of vindicating his character. It wd. be the best way therefore to provide in the Constitution for the regular punishment of the Executive when his misconduct should deserve it, and for his honorable acquittal when he should be unjustly accused.
Page 111 - It is a technical term. It is used in a very old statute of that country whose language is our language, and whose laws form the substratum of our laws. It is scarcely conceivable that the term was not employed by the framers of our constitution in the sense which had been affixed to it by those from whom we borrowed it.
Page 112 - ... 67 But he went on to argue that the President must certainly be punishable for giving false information to the Senate. He is to regulate all intercourse with foreign powers, and it is his duty to impart to the Senate every material intelligence he receives. If it should appear that he has not given them full information, but has concealed important intelligence which he ought to have communicated, and by that, means induced them to enter into measures injurious to their country, and which they...
Page 34 - A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should himself observe, high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved.
Page 108 - No point is of more importance than that the right of impeachment should be continued. Shall any man be above justice ? Above all, shall that man be above it who can commit the most extensive injustice ? When great crimes were committed, he was for punishing the principal as well as the coadjutors.
Page 134 - Senate, except when they sit to try the impeachment of the President, in which case the Chief Justice shall preside, and excepting also when he shall exercise the powers and duties of President, in which case, and in case of his absence, the Senate shall chuse a President pro tempore — The Vice President when acting as President of the Senate shall not have a vote unless the House be equally divided Sect.