American Federal Tax Reports, Volume 2; Volume 40Prentice-Hall, 1978 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 77-5155
... evidence because to do so would have branded the defendant as a felon based on unconstitutionally obtained evidence , if the verdict had been guilty at that time . The government argues that pursuant to Fed . R. Civ . P. 12 ( e ) a ...
... evidence because to do so would have branded the defendant as a felon based on unconstitutionally obtained evidence , if the verdict had been guilty at that time . The government argues that pursuant to Fed . R. Civ . P. 12 ( e ) a ...
Page 77-5637
... evidence contradicting taxpayer's testimo- nial evidence . Therefore , the defense would rely , of necessity , upon impeachment and witness credibility , available only through examination and cross - examination . Even though summary ...
... evidence contradicting taxpayer's testimo- nial evidence . Therefore , the defense would rely , of necessity , upon impeachment and witness credibility , available only through examination and cross - examination . Even though summary ...
Page 77-6314
... evidence , but it disappears in a proceeding to review the assessment when substantial evidence contrary to the Commissioner's finding is introduced . Thereafter , the Tax Court , in such a proceeding , must make its own findings based ...
... evidence , but it disappears in a proceeding to review the assessment when substantial evidence contrary to the Commissioner's finding is introduced . Thereafter , the Tax Court , in such a proceeding , must make its own findings based ...
Contents
AFTR2d Parallel Citations Tables 11 | 77-4867 |
Case Table for Volumes 3140 AFTR2d 51 | 77-4881 |
Income Tax Decisions 775001 | 77-5001 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
40 AFTR 9th Cir action AFTR 2d agreement Alexander amended amount appeal applied assessment assets Bank & Trust bankrupt Bankruptcy BMAL Boldface type refers Calif carryback Circuit Cite as 40 claim Co-Exec coal Comm Commissioner Company Corp corporation costs Ct.Cl deduction defendant defendant's Dept Dist District Court Douglas evidence Exec Execx exemption expenses F.Supp fact federal filed foreign tax Gorfinkle Government Grand Jury held income tax interest Internal Revenue Code Internal Revenue Service investment issue July June jurisdiction Koehring lien ment motion operation P-H Fed paid parties payment Phillips plaintiff purpose refers to volume refund Rule S.Ct Section Sept statute summary judgment supra Tax Court tax liability tax returns taxpayer tion tract transaction Trial Judges U.S. Atty U.S. District Court U.S. dollars United Vepco