Page images
[ocr errors]

ve IG 3

ste I Suring this, they er 18-19 S. Imp. :o espress the

CAKI TE DUS IETE ec cousness of LSL U te ri ni ister; to him Te Tai jume ni se, they re

I rer. the author of Seir 20.1.



(PART 11.)


What shall we say then? shall we continue in sin, that

grace may abound? God forbid.

The same Scriptures, which represent the death of Christ as having that which belongs to the death of no other

person, namely, an efficacy in procuring the salvation of man, are also constant and uniform in

representing the necessity of our own endeavours, of our own good works, for the same purpose. They go further. They foresaw that in stating, and still more when they went about to extol and magnify, the death of Christ, as instrumental to salvation, they were laying a foundation for the opinion, that men's own works, their own virtue, their personal endeavours, were superseded and dispensed with. In proportion as the sacrifice of the death of Christ was effectual, in the same proportion were these less necessary: if the death of Christ was sufficient, if redemption was complete, then were these not necessary at all. They foresaw that some would draw this consequence from their doctrine, and they provided against it.

way. Saint

ti joserrible, that the same consequence might be ieiuced sou the goodness of God in any way of representing it: not only in the particular and peculiar way in which it is represented in the redemption of the world by Jesus Christ, but in any other Paul, for one, was sensible of this; and, therefore, when he speaks of the goodness of God even in general terus he takes care to point out the only true turn which ought to be given to it in our thoughts—“ Despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance, and long-suffering ; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?" as if he had said, With thee, I perceive, that the consideration of the godness of God leads to the allowing of thyself in sin: Ehes is not to know what that consideration ought in truth to lead to: it ought to lead thee to repentance, do no other conclusion.

Again; when the apostle had been speaking of the revustess of God displayed by the wickedness of Bar was not unaware of the misconstruction to

es representation was liable, and which it had, in the porn vrienced: which misconstruction he states als We be slanderously reported, and some affirm, she let us do evil that good may come.” This

ent, however, he regards as nothing less than awer and wilful perversion of his words, and of the ***** w other Christian teachers: therefore he says

muling those who did thus pervert them, “ their Marion is just :” they will be justly condemned Hi has abusing the doctrine which we teach. The peve however, clearly shows, that the application of

yursions to the encouragement of licentiousness Hos an application contrary to their intention ; "Mi a fail, a perversion of their words.

grace,” that

In like manner in the same chapter our apostle had no sooner laid down the doctrine, that “a man is

a justified by faith without the deeds of the law,” than he checks himself, as it were, by subjoining this proviso: “ Do we then make void the law through faith ? God forbid : yea, we establish the law :" Whatever he meant by his assertion concerning faith, he takes care to let them know he did not mean this, “ to make void the law,” or to dispense with obedience.

But the clearest text to our purpose is that, undoubtedly, which I have prefixed to this discourse. Saint Paul, after expatiating largely upon the “ is, the favour, kindness, and mercy of God, the extent, the greatness, the comprehensiveness of that mercy, as manifested in the Christian dispensation, puts this question to his reader—“ What shall we say then ? shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound ?” which he answers by a strong negative—“ God forbid.” What the apostle designed in this passage is sufficiently evident. He knew in what manner some might be apt to construe his expressions: and he anticipates their mistake. He is beforehand with them, by protesting against any such use being made of his doctrine; which, yet he was aware, might by possibility be made.

By way of showing scripturally the obligation and the necessity of personal endeavours after virtue, all the numerous texts which exhort to virtue, and admonish us against vice, might be quoted; for they are all directly to the purpose: that is, we might quote every page of the New Testament.

“ Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my father which is in heaven.” “ If ye know these things,

" happy are ye if ye do them.” In both these texts the rewards attends the doing : the promise is annexed to


1 TIT BID.Tality,

2 cm and E DET RECIB ula. 1 27 s TD: cieth

e Tabat,teenuTu eres, 25 I rate s told

* čo sa stall His These are a few < sum: Eut, tre are recerer terus cannot 12 Ke Tee the pur

I Tre Spare the zit era re, so far as

Eu decisre. But :isse, oso interSESUs especially Sist of the death of

cida pessages, as Trans of virtue ; i üreteers cannot be m. vi erences, is, by

DET VI LEe to do,) that it :* wie e re. inferences,

Tie of, which they

a viui pavested against. Es sie sehe writings in 2.WRT at FI1 Drew: and they who

is coming the minds of .....Druczestion more deter

t" Dicon to good works, ..Sest sin could do. I

iznis opez, that whatever was tremezcacy of the death Cara ve Rum :707 apprehension,

« PreviousContinue »