The American and English Railroad Cases: A Collection of All Cases, Affecting Railroads of Every Kind, Decided by the Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction in the United States, England, and Canada [1894-1913].E. Thompson Company, 1903 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... given to the jury that tried the issues in the case , over the objections of the defendant , was the following : Instruction 3 : " Now , if you find from the testimony that the guard was improperly constructed , or that the guard itself ...
... given to the jury that tried the issues in the case , over the objections of the defendant , was the following : Instruction 3 : " Now , if you find from the testimony that the guard was improperly constructed , or that the guard itself ...
Page 7
... given at the instance of the plaintiff may be open to criticism in omitting the matter of notice to the defendant that the skid was lying on the plat- form , still this omission was fully supplied by other instruc- tions , and , the ...
... given at the instance of the plaintiff may be open to criticism in omitting the matter of notice to the defendant that the skid was lying on the plat- form , still this omission was fully supplied by other instruc- tions , and , the ...
Page 12
... given was not prejudicial when those given properly presented the only issues necessary to be determined by the jury . Evidence - Contributory Negligence - Implied Admission . In an action against a railroad for personal injuries , a ...
... given was not prejudicial when those given properly presented the only issues necessary to be determined by the jury . Evidence - Contributory Negligence - Implied Admission . In an action against a railroad for personal injuries , a ...
Page 15
... given , we do not think the refusal of the court to give them was prejudicial to appel- lant , as those given presented the only issues of fact necessary to be determined by the jury . Counsel for appellant complain of the action of the ...
... given , we do not think the refusal of the court to give them was prejudicial to appel- lant , as those given presented the only issues of fact necessary to be determined by the jury . Counsel for appellant complain of the action of the ...
Page 29
... given two blasts of the whistle , and , not hearing any signal from any other engine , assumed , under the rules observed in the switch yards St. Louis Nat . Stock Yards v . Godfrey in VOL 7 R R R - VOL 30 AM & ENG R CAS , NS 29.
... given two blasts of the whistle , and , not hearing any signal from any other engine , assumed , under the rules observed in the switch yards St. Louis Nat . Stock Yards v . Godfrey in VOL 7 R R R - VOL 30 AM & ENG R CAS , NS 29.
Common terms and phrases
accident action adverse possession affirmed agent alleged appellant appellee approaching authority brakeman cause charge Chicago child circuit court claim collision commerce common carrier complaint conductor construction contract contributory negligence corporation cotton counsel crossing damages danger deceased defendant company defendant in error defendant's demurrer duty engine entitled evidence exercise fact feet filed fire freight garnishee grant guilty held highway injury instruction interstate Judge judgment jurisdiction jury land liable motion motorman Northern Central Railway Northern Pacific Railroad operation ordinary P. R. Co pany party passenger Pennsylvania Co person petition plaintiff in error platform question rail Railroad Co railroad company Railway Company reason recover refused road rule running servants spark arrester statute stop street railway Supreme Court switch testified testimony thereof ticket tion track train trial verdict whistle witness