Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, Volume 65
Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper
Phelphs & Stevens, printers, 1889
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action affirmed agent alleged allowed amount answer appears application assessment assignment authority bill bond brings building cause charge circuit court claim complainant concurred condition considered construction contract corporation counsel court creditors damages Decided decree deed defendant directed error evidence executed facts filed follows fraud further Gardner give given grant hands held highway interest issue judge judgment jury justice land lots ment Mich Michigan mortgage necessary notice objection obtained opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff possession premises present probate proceedings proof proper purchase question railroad raised reason received record recover reference rule says secure sold statute street sufficient suit taken testified testimony thereof tion township trial trustees witness
Page 316 - No person duly authorized to practice physic or surgery shall be allowed to disclose any information which he may have acquired in attending any patient in his professional character, and which information was necessary to enable him to prescribe for such patient as a physician, or to do any act for him as a surgeon: Prnrldcd, however.
Page 89 - Whenever a judgment at law, or a decree in chancery, shall be obtained against any corporation, incorporated under the laws of this state, and an execution issued thereon shall have been returned unsatisfied in part or in whole...
Page 448 - I apprehend that when a party having knowledge of such facts as would lead any honest man, using ordinary caution, to make further inquiries, does not make, but, on the contrary, studiously avoids making such obvious inquiries, he must be taken to have notice of those facts which, if he had used such ordinary diligence, he would readily have ascertained.
Page 407 - Conflicting evidence as to deliberation and premeditation on a trial for murder, held sufficient to warrant the submission of the case to the jury and to sustain their verdict, objected to as against the weight of evidence.
Page 525 - Illinois, for and in consideration of One dollar, to me in hand paid, and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed, do hereby grant, bargain, remise, convey, release, and quit-claim unto...
Page 5 - ... the issue to the jury shall be whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty; and if the jury shall find him guilty, or if he shall admit the truth of the accusation, he shall be adjudged to be the father of such child, and shall stand chargeable with the maintenance thereof, with the assistance of the mother, in such manner as the court shall order, and...
Page 421 - State only in manner following, that is to say, that a quantity of land not exceeding one hundred and twenty sections, and included within a continuous length of twenty miles of roads, respectively, may be sold; and when the governor of said State shall certify to the Secretary of the Interior that any twenty continuous miles of either of said roads are completed...
Page 75 - ... and this deponent further says that he has good reason to believe, and does believe, that the said defendants have assigned, disposed of, and sold their property, with intent to defraud their creditors.