The American and English Railroad Cases: A Collection of All Cases, Affecting Railroads of Every Kind, Decided by the Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction in the United States, England, and Canada [1894-1913].E. Thompson Company, 1910 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 96
Page 17
... operation of the train and the defective condi- tion of the road , are not sufficient to entitle the petitioner to the re- moval of the cause , where , in Kentucky , the facts alleged and proved against the lessee railway company in the ...
... operation of the train and the defective condi- tion of the road , are not sufficient to entitle the petitioner to the re- moval of the cause , where , in Kentucky , the facts alleged and proved against the lessee railway company in the ...
Page 29
... operation of their train is not open too much , if any , controversy . The evidence showing that the second section was run in violation of rules 91 and 98a , and of the time - table , and as stated by the superintendent in the service ...
... operation of their train is not open too much , if any , controversy . The evidence showing that the second section was run in violation of rules 91 and 98a , and of the time - table , and as stated by the superintendent in the service ...
Page 31
... operation of separate trains . The question then arises : Are the members of train crews of separate trains fellow servants within the meaning of the statute ? We think they are not . They are not in such case " working together at the ...
... operation of separate trains . The question then arises : Are the members of train crews of separate trains fellow servants within the meaning of the statute ? We think they are not . They are not in such case " working together at the ...
Page 35
... Operation Injuries to Licensee - Contributory Negli- gence Question for Jury . - Where there was evidence that decedent , on request of the conductor of a train to remove certain skids from behind a standing car , stepped on the car to ...
... Operation Injuries to Licensee - Contributory Negli- gence Question for Jury . - Where there was evidence that decedent , on request of the conductor of a train to remove certain skids from behind a standing car , stepped on the car to ...
Page 36
... Operation Injuries to Licensee - Question for Jury.— The proper interpretation of a conductor's words in telling decedent to remove certain skids , and of his conduct in connection with all the surrounding conditions , was for the jury ...
... Operation Injuries to Licensee - Question for Jury.— The proper interpretation of a conductor's words in telling decedent to remove certain skids , and of his conduct in connection with all the surrounding conditions , was for the jury ...
Common terms and phrases
accident action affirmed agent alleged appellant appellant's appellee approaching authorities bill of lading brakeman caboose charge Chicago Circuit Court City claim collision common carrier complaint conductor consignee contract contributory negligence corporation County crossing damages danger deceased defect defendant defendant's demurrer depot duty employees engine error evidence exercise fact failed failure feet foreman freight guilty held horses Illinois Central Railroad injury instruction interstate Iowa judgment for plaintiff jury Kansas last foot-note liable Louis Louisville & N. R. Lumber master Missouri motorman operation ordinary pany person plaintiff in error platform proximate cause question rail railroad company Railway Company reason recover reversed road rule shipment shipper signals Sioux City South Southern Southern Railway Company speed station statute stockyards stop street car struck Supreme Court sustained switch testified testimony tion transportation trial court verdict wagon warning witness yards