Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, Volume 74Michigan. Supreme Court, George C. Gibbs, Randolph Manning, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, William Jennison, Elijah W. Meddaugh, Henry Allen Chaney, Hovey K. Clarke, William Dudley Fuller, Hoyt Post, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper Phelphs & Stevens, printers, 1890 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 73
Page 9
... present case the suit was commenced the day before the assignment was made . The assignment proceed- ing can in no way affect the right of the plaintiff to pro- ceed to judgment , whether the suit is commenced before or after the ...
... present case the suit was commenced the day before the assignment was made . The assignment proceed- ing can in no way affect the right of the plaintiff to pro- ceed to judgment , whether the suit is commenced before or after the ...
Page 10
... present case . The second proposition of counsel for defendants has as little force . Testimony was given by the plaintiff tending to show the sale and delivery of the goods to the defendants . Testimony was also given by Charles B ...
... present case . The second proposition of counsel for defendants has as little force . Testimony was given by the plaintiff tending to show the sale and delivery of the goods to the defendants . Testimony was also given by Charles B ...
Page 18
... presents some peculiar features , but we are unable to see that there was not testimony legally competent to lead to a verdict , if believed , as it seems to have been . Neither , in our opinion , is there anything in the record which ...
... presents some peculiar features , but we are unable to see that there was not testimony legally competent to lead to a verdict , if believed , as it seems to have been . Neither , in our opinion , is there anything in the record which ...
Page 25
... action . Contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff , and of those in charge of the child , were questions of fact for the jury , and on this record does not present a question of RAJNOWSKI v . RAILROAD CO . 25.
... action . Contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff , and of those in charge of the child , were questions of fact for the jury , and on this record does not present a question of RAJNOWSKI v . RAILROAD CO . 25.
Page 26
... present a question of law for the court . The plaintiff sues in a representative capacity . The judgment , when recovered , is under the statute to be distributed to the persons and in the proportions pro- vided by law for the ...
... present a question of law for the court . The plaintiff sues in a representative capacity . The judgment , when recovered , is under the statute to be distributed to the persons and in the proportions pro- vided by law for the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres action affirmed agent alleged Alpena Alpena county amount appears April 12 asphaltum assessed assignment assumpsit attorney Auditor authority bill Canfield certiorari CHAMPLIN charge circuit court circuit judge citing claim Cockell commissioner common counts complainant contract counsel damages decree deed Defendant brings error defendant's Detroit duty equity evidence fact February 15 filed Grand Rapids held highway horse injury interest James Davenport judgment jury Justices concurred Knights of Labor land liable lien liquors logs lumber mandamus ment Montcalm county mortgage N. W. Rep negligence notice opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff probate proceedings purchase question Railroad reason received record recover refused register of deeds replevin respondent sell sold Stat statute street suit surveyed township Sweet testified testimony thereof timber tion township trial verdict Wayne county witness writ