The American Law Register, Volume 24; Volume 33D.B. Canfield & Company, 1885 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 84
Page 12
... the husband's estate , & c . None of these were presented or considered in that proceeding . After that divorce was granted the wife could have presented her claim for alimony , which the court 12 RIGHT TO ALIMONY AFTER DIVORCE .
... the husband's estate , & c . None of these were presented or considered in that proceeding . After that divorce was granted the wife could have presented her claim for alimony , which the court 12 RIGHT TO ALIMONY AFTER DIVORCE .
Page 13
... claim for alimony in the Ken- tucky divorce proceeding made no difference . That matter was not rendered res adjudicata by the failure , and consequently the Ohio court did not undertake to re - try any question involved in the Kentucky ...
... claim for alimony in the Ken- tucky divorce proceeding made no difference . That matter was not rendered res adjudicata by the failure , and consequently the Ohio court did not undertake to re - try any question involved in the Kentucky ...
Page 14
... Shotwell , holding that the failure of the wife to claim alimony in the proceedings for divorce was no bar to a further application for that purpose . In South Carolina ( Jelineau v . Jelineau , 2 14 RIGHT TO ALIMONY AFTER DIVORCE .
... Shotwell , holding that the failure of the wife to claim alimony in the proceedings for divorce was no bar to a further application for that purpose . In South Carolina ( Jelineau v . Jelineau , 2 14 RIGHT TO ALIMONY AFTER DIVORCE .
Page 43
... claim that case does not decide the question now raised . " The decision in Burns v . Simpson , supra , goes further than counsel are willing to concede . In that case the judgment was rendered June 4th 1859 , for $ 3054 and costs ...
... claim that case does not decide the question now raised . " The decision in Burns v . Simpson , supra , goes further than counsel are willing to concede . In that case the judgment was rendered June 4th 1859 , for $ 3054 and costs ...
Page 45
... claim the state had upon the property was to secure the payment of $ 676.80 , with interest , and that there was no controversy between the state and Matilda W. Hummer as to the lien of the state . judgment in no way affected the state ...
... claim the state had upon the property was to secure the payment of $ 676.80 , with interest , and that there was no controversy between the state and Matilda W. Hummer as to the lien of the state . judgment in no way affected the state ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agent agreement alimony appear application assignment authority Bank Barb bill carrier cause of action certificate charge chose in action claim common carrier common law contract contributory negligence corporation court of equity creditors damages debt debtor decision decree defendant defendant's delivered divorce doctrine domicile duty enforce entitled equity evidence execution executors fact fraud garnishee ground held husband injury interest Iowa judge judgment judicial judicial notice jurisdiction jury labor land liable Mass matter ment mortgage negligence notice Ohio St opinion owner party passenger payment Penn person Pinnel's plaintiff principle proceeding promissory note purchase question Railroad Co railroad company railway reason received recover refusal rule separate servant Smith statute Statute of Frauds suit supra Supreme Court testator tion tort train trust valid void wife
Popular passages
Page 59 - A person duly authorized to practice physic or surgery, or a professional or registered nurse, shall not be allowed to disclose any information which he acquired in attending a patient in a professional capacity, and which was necessary to enable him to act in that capacity...
Page 302 - Generally in all matters not herein-before particularly mentioned, in which there is any conflict or variance between the Rules of Equity and the Rules of the Common Law with reference to the same matter, the rules of Equity shall prevail.
Page 650 - By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law, that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband ; under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs everything ; and is therefore called in our law French a.
Page 60 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 727 - The court may determine any controversy between parties before it, when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of others, or by saving their rights ; but when a complete determination of the controversy cannot be had without the presence of other parties, the court must order them to be brought in.
Page 613 - It is agreed between the sender of the following message and this company that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery, of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence of its servants or otherwise, beyond the amount received for sending the same...
Page 61 - In all other respects, the laws of the State in which the court is held shall be the rules of decision as to the competency of witnesses in the courts 100] of the United States in trials at common law and in equity and admiralty.
Page 734 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted.
Page 767 - But in all cases there must be a reasonable ground, founded upon the relations of the parties to each other, either pecuniary or of blood or affinity, to expect some benefit or advantage from the continuance of the life of the assured.
Page 60 - That in actions by or against executors, administrators or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by the court.