The American Law Register, Volume 24; Volume 33D.B. Canfield & Company, 1885 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 87
Page 12
... Suit was brought in Kentucky on this judgment for alimony , to which was pleaded the Kentucky divorce , and also that the Ohio court had no jursidiction to decree alimony , and hence the judgment upon which the suit was brought is null ...
... Suit was brought in Kentucky on this judgment for alimony , to which was pleaded the Kentucky divorce , and also that the Ohio court had no jursidiction to decree alimony , and hence the judgment upon which the suit was brought is null ...
Page 14
... suit for alimony was not maintainable . And this appears to be consistent with the Mississippi statute ( Code sect . 1159 ) , providing that when the divorce is decreed , the court shall then make the orders concerning alimony . The ...
... suit for alimony was not maintainable . And this appears to be consistent with the Mississippi statute ( Code sect . 1159 ) , providing that when the divorce is decreed , the court shall then make the orders concerning alimony . The ...
Page 17
... suit for divorce , and is not a matter which can constitute the subject of an independent suit . It must be adjudged in the divorce proceeding or not at all . All questions VOL . XXXIII . - 3 of property are litigated in a suit for ...
... suit for divorce , and is not a matter which can constitute the subject of an independent suit . It must be adjudged in the divorce proceeding or not at all . All questions VOL . XXXIII . - 3 of property are litigated in a suit for ...
Page 18
of property are litigated in a suit for divorce , and must there be settled . The complaint here shows that the parties have been divorced , and the legal inference is that the subject - matter of the suit was there settled and put at ...
of property are litigated in a suit for divorce , and must there be settled . The complaint here shows that the parties have been divorced , and the legal inference is that the subject - matter of the suit was there settled and put at ...
Page 42
... suit ; that the sheriff of Jackson county be appointed a receiver to ascertain the interest of Matilda W. Hum- mer in the land described in the petition ; that he take possession of the same and hold it , with the rents and profits ...
... suit ; that the sheriff of Jackson county be appointed a receiver to ascertain the interest of Matilda W. Hum- mer in the land described in the petition ; that he take possession of the same and hold it , with the rents and profits ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agent agreement alimony appear application assignment authority Bank Barb bill carrier cause of action certificate charge chose in action claim common carrier common law contract contributory negligence corporation court of equity creditors damages debt debtor decision decree defendant defendant's delivered divorce doctrine domicile duty enforce entitled equity evidence execution executors fact fraud garnishee ground held husband injury interest Iowa judge judgment judicial judicial notice jurisdiction jury labor land liable Mass matter ment mortgage negligence notice Ohio St opinion owner party passenger payment Penn person Pinnel's plaintiff principle proceeding promissory note purchase question Railroad Co railroad company railway reason received recover refusal rule separate servant Smith statute Statute of Frauds suit supra Supreme Court testator tion tort train trust valid void wife
Popular passages
Page 59 - A person duly authorized to practice physic or surgery, or a professional or registered nurse, shall not be allowed to disclose any information which he acquired in attending a patient in a professional capacity, and which was necessary to enable him to act in that capacity...
Page 302 - Generally in all matters not herein-before particularly mentioned, in which there is any conflict or variance between the Rules of Equity and the Rules of the Common Law with reference to the same matter, the rules of Equity shall prevail.
Page 650 - By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law, that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband ; under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs everything ; and is therefore called in our law French a.
Page 60 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 727 - The court may determine any controversy between parties before it, when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of others, or by saving their rights ; but when a complete determination of the controversy cannot be had without the presence of other parties, the court must order them to be brought in.
Page 613 - It is agreed between the sender of the following message and this company that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery, of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence of its servants or otherwise, beyond the amount received for sending the same...
Page 61 - In all other respects, the laws of the State in which the court is held shall be the rules of decision as to the competency of witnesses in the courts 100] of the United States in trials at common law and in equity and admiralty.
Page 734 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted.
Page 767 - But in all cases there must be a reasonable ground, founded upon the relations of the parties to each other, either pecuniary or of blood or affinity, to expect some benefit or advantage from the continuance of the life of the assured.
Page 60 - That in actions by or against executors, administrators or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by the court.