What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
A Treatise on Trial by Jury, Including Questions of Law and Fact: With an ...
No preview available - 2016
according accused action allowed amount answer appear applied authority body called cause challenge character charge circumstances civil Code common Commonwealth considered Constitution counsel court crime criminal decided decision defendant determine directed doubt duty effect England entitled error established evidence examination exercised exist expressed fact favor give given grand jury ground guilty held important indictment instance instructions intent Iowa issue judge judgment jurors justice knowledge limit Lord manner matter names necessary oath objection offence officer opinion panel party Penn person plaintiff practice present principle prisoner proceedings proof proper proved question question of fact reason reference refused regard relation respect rule says selected sheriff Stat statute sufficient summoned sworn taken term testimony tion trial trial by jury twelve verdict witness York
Page 398 - It is that state of the case, which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of the jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge.
Page 243 - ... no person shall be disqualified as a juror by reason of having formed or expressed an opinion upon the matter or cause to be submitted to such jury, founded upon public rumor, statements in public journals, or common notoriety; provided it appear to the court, upon his declaration, under oath or otherwise, that he can and will, notwithstanding such an opinion, act impartially and fairly upon the matters to be submitted to him.
Page 516 - When there is a verdict of conviction, in which it appears to the court that the jury have mistaken the law, the court may explain the reason for that opinion and direct the jury to reconsider their verdict...
Page 204 - A challenge to the panel can be founded only on a material departure from the forms prescribed in respect to the drawing and return of the jury in civil actions, or on the intentional omission of the sheriff to summon one or more of the jurors drawn.
Page 539 - We think, that in all cases of this nature, the law has invested courts of justice with the authority to discharge a jury from giving any verdict, whenever, in their opinion, taking all the circumstances into consideration, there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.
Page 123 - Constitution for the United States. The best judges of the matter will be the least anxious for a constitutional establishment of the trial by jury in civil cases, and will be the most ready to admit that the changes which are continually happening in the affairs of society may render a different mode of determining questions of property preferable in many cases in which that mode of trial now prevails.
Page 288 - I will now make it appear to the world, that there never lived a viler viper upon the face of the earth than thou.
Page 33 - The general law of the land is in favor of the wager of battle, and it is our duty to pronounce the law as it is, and not as we may wish it to be. Whatever prejudices, therefore, may justly exist against this mode of trial, still, as it is the law of the land, the court must pronounce judgment for it.
Page 74 - ... but you shall present all things truly as they come to your knowledge, according to the best of your understanding. So help you God...
Page 443 - In prosecutions for the publication of papers investigating the official conduct of officers, or men in a public capacity, or where the matter published is proper for public information, the truth thereof may be given in evidence. And, in all indictments for libels, the jury shall have a right to determine the law and the facts under the direction of the court as in other cases.