Digest of Decisions of the Department of the Interior in Cases Relating to the Public Lands Also: Acts of Congress and Revised Statutes Cited and Construed; Circulars; and Rules of Practice Cited and Construed. Volumes 1 to 40, Inclusive, Part 2

Front Cover
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1913

From inside the book

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 182 - Murray's Lessee et al. v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co., 18 How. 272.
Page 129 - Omanson, 10 Utah 124; 37 Pac. 250.) A withdrawal of lands under this act will defeat a prior application to purchase the same under the timber and stone laws where, at the date of withdrawal, the applicant had acquired no vested right to the lands embraced in his application. (Board of Control, Canal No. 3, State of Colorado v. Torrence, 32 LD 472.) Upon the cancellation of a homestead entry covering lands embraced within a subsequent withdrawal made under the act, the withdrawal becomes effective...
Page 213 - ... railroad corporation owns or is entitled to use for railroad purposes, is the entire strip or tract it owns or is entitled to use for this purpose, and not any specific or limited part thereof upon which its main track or other specified improvements are located. Joy v. St.
Page 182 - National Typographic Co. v. New York Typographic Co., 44 Fed. Rep. 711; Campbell v.
Page 127 - Bay v. Oklahoma Southern Gas, Oil and Mining Co. et al. (73 Pac. Rep., 936) 40-605 Beadle, William (11 CLO, 134) 4-392 Beaks v.
Page 150 - ... previously does not prevent the work from being applied as assessment work on the Violet Ray claims so long as it is so intended, is practical, and will promote the exploration of the claims in regard to which the assessment work is claimed. The evidence here establishes the good faith of the respondents. Fissure Mining Co. v. Old Susan Mining Co., 22 Utah 438, 63 P. 587.

Bibliographic information