Page images
PDF
EPUB

Clough Colliery, in the Co. Kilkenny, I regret being unable to give you much information on the matter.

"I was appointed receiver under the courts in 1881, when the rent of the colliery was 6007. a year. Mr. Robson was the lessee, Mr. Meadows the manager. I do not know what the rent was previous to 1881. I never saw the lease. The late agent is dead.

"In 1885 Mr. Meadows reported that the coal was running out. I employed a Mr. Mammatt, an experienced mining engineer from England, to examine the mine, and report thereon. I give you the following extract from his report, dated 17th June, 1885:

66

According to the accounts furnished to me by the lessees, they have sold under the present lease to 1st January, 1885, 63,261 tons of coal, realising 30,0761. 7s. 9d. One-tenth of this sum amounts to 3,0077. 12s. 9d., leaving a balance of 1,1921. 7s. 3d. of minimum rent paid in advance of coal got. I estimate that there were 4a. 3r. 15p. of workable coal remaining in January last, which will produce 17,349 tons. The average price realised during the last seven years for the coal is 9s. 6 1d. per ton, and the value, therefore, of the unworked coal will be 8,2481. One-tenth of this amounts to 8247. 16s., so that there will remain a balance of overpaid rent of 3671. 11s. 3d. At the present rate of working it will take about two years to get the remaining portion of this seam.'

999

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Ballycastle Coalfield; Co. Antrim.-It appears that these collieries were worked down to 1883 under a lease at a rent of 1,000l. per annum (Q. 12,230), and were abandoned in that year because the then owner, the late Sir Frederick Boyd, refused to grant a new lease at a rent of 6001. Whether he was well advised in this seems to be doubtful, for it is stated (Q. 12,319) that the present owner would be willing to grant a lease at a much lower rent. She has apparently failed, however, to find a tenant upon any terms. The reason for this seems to be due to the fact mentioned by Mr. J. B. Johnstone (Q. 12,317) that "work the coal properly we would have to go down below "sea level," and it is evident that investigations made since 1883 have resulted in an opinion that this could not be done at a profit. A report on this coalfield was made to the Royal Dublin Society in 1886, by Mr. G. H. Kinahan, in which he says:

66

to

"The higher coals, or those above the level of the sea, are worked out. There are, however, two coals, called the 'sea coals,' below the sea level, still unwrought, which have been estimated to contain about 18,000,000 tons of coal; but as far as trials have been made they are unprofitable, on account of the drainage of the sea into the workings; very little, therefore, (if any), of this coal can be profitably raised." (Scientific Proceedings of Royal Dublin Society, October, 1886, Vol. V. (N.S.), part 4.)

County Tyrone Coalfield -Mr. Thos. A. Dickson, M.P., complains (Q. 12,792) that in seeking for a renewal of a lease from "about a dozen" landowners, one of them refused to agree except upon payment of a very large fine. It is a matter for regret that this gentlemen's name and address were not mentioned, as it would have enabled inquiries to be made. As the matter stands, it is only possible to point out that further on in his evidence (Q. 12,795), he admits that the largest proprietor in the district (Lord Ranfurly) "never places any difficulty in the way," and that the difficulties arise from the fact that "just in that immediate neighbourhood there are numerous small landowners." These small landowners are in most cases not "landlords" in the usual acceptation of the term; and the difficulties of dealing with them are doubtless similar to those which various witnesses speak of

meeting in attempts to deal with the still smaller landowners who have become proprietors under the Land Purchase Acts.

County Wicklow Mines.-Several statements were made by the late Mr. Parnell, M.P., (Q. 12,667, 12,672), and by Mr. G. H. Kinahan (Q. 13,630-1), complaining of the action of landowners in the county of Wicklow, in the mining district of the valley of Ovoca. Unfortunately no names were given, and I have so far been unable to ascertain to whom most of their statements were intended to apply. My inquiries, however, have elicited the fact that some of the landed proprietors of that district have ceased to look with much favour upon the proposals of mining adventurers, owing to the aimost universal collapse and abandonment of the various mines which have been started there from time to time. Their present derelict condition appears to be due to foreign competition, or the unprofitable character of the works, and not to the action of the landed proprietors. In the result, however, it is stated that a valuable right of fishing which once existed in the local river and streams has been destroyed, and the natural scenery of this picturesque district has been greatly defaced by these mining works, while the capital sunk in them by both the local proprietors and others has been lost. It is, therefore, no great wonder that many people look coldly now or projects of the kind in the neighbourhood.

On the other hand I have been informed that most of the larger proprietors are still quite willing to entertain and facilitate any proposals which may seem likely to turn out well, and this view is corroborated by the following particulars of one of the cases mentioned by the witnesses.

Mr. G. H. Kinahan (Q. 13,630) quoted what he called 66 a very remarkable case "of a mine which was just able to pay its way when subject to a royalty of one-twentysecond, and which had to be abandoned, because, as he alleged, the landlord refused to renew the lease without a renewal fine and a royalty of one-fifteenth. It was ascertained is remarks applied to a case on the estates of Viscount Powerscourt, and Mr. Kinahan's statements were brought under his notice by Mr. Walmesley. The following is Lord Powerscourt's reply:

66

DEAR SIR,

"65, Brook Street, W.

"I remember the circuinstances about the case of Mr. Hodgson and the mine at Castlemacadam, in the county Wicklow.

"I sold the estate some years ago to the Rev. Mr. Hallowes, rector of that place.

[ocr errors]

"Mr. Hodgson had been the tenant of my mine for many years, before I was born, I believe, and used to pay a royalty on the ore raised.

"When I came of age in 1857 the royalty amounted to some 1,2001. a year. From that time forward it steadily decreased, on account of the competition of the Neapolitan and other sulphur mines, which put their ore on the market at a lower rate than was possible in Ireland.

"The royalty went down to a very small sum yearly, and, of course, I, as the proprietor, made investigations into the reasons. At last Mr. Hodgson volunteered himself, having made large profits in former years, to pay me a dead-rent of 50l. a year for five years, to which I agreed.

"Shortly after this Mr. Hodgson died, and the mine became derelict, or nearly so.

"I sold the estate, including the mine, to Mr. Hallowes, who is now the proprietor. I believe the mine is only worked for ochre now.

66

"The statement that the mine is idle because of any increase of royalty on my part is simply untrue. It may be observed that the mine opposite, on the other side of the river, belonging to the Mining Company of Ireland, is also idle, or nearly so. Simply, it does not pay to work them on account of foreign competition.

"It is most unfortunate that so many Irish industries of this character fail, but I think that the authorities of the Geological Survey in Dublin can give very good reasons for their failure from natural causes. Of course, all these things are attributed to the dire influence of landlords; but will any person of any common sense suppose for a moment that any proprietor would be such a fool as to impose impossible terms upon the tenant of a mine, so as to render it unprofitable to work it, thus cutting his own throat, and killing the goose with the golden eggs! "You may make any use of this you please. "Yours faithfully, (Signed) POWERSCOURT.

66

April 5, 1892. "Oswald Walmesley, Esq.,,

"2, Stone Buildings, "Lincoln's Inn, W.C."

Appendix A.

Papers handed in by witnesses.

Appendix A.

Papers handed
En by witnesses.

Appendix B.

INDIA AND THE

COLONIES. Notes on Mining Laws by Mr. Walmesley.

It may be added that Lort Powerscourt's statements in the foregoing letter are largely corroborated by Mr. Kinahan himself, in the following passage, froin his report on the sulphur mines of this district, published in the Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, for October, 1886.

"While the great demand for sulphur lasted, vast sums were made by the different adventurers; and as in late years there was a demand for iron ore, it also was a considerable source of profit. The great demand ceased about the year 1865, and afterwards the mines rapidly declined, and now little or nothing is being done" (page 307).

I believe it will be found that the principal cases mentioned or indicated by the witnesses are dealt with in the information contained in the foregoing observations.

G. DE L. WILLIS.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

7,861 19 11

436 17 1

Lead Copper. Zinc.

16 2 6

AND THE COLONIES, prepared The following is a short statement as to the minerals which are found in India and the different Colonies, and as to the laws which govern the ownership and regulate the working of such minerals.

The statement is necessarily incomplete, being prepared from insufficient materials, and is subject to correction and improvement when further materials become available. It will, however, afford some indication of the variety of legislation which exists with reference to the subject matter, and may serve as an index to such legislation, and as the basis of a more complete and authentic statement to be prepared at a later date, if required.

425 18 11

8,740 18 5

As many of the laws and regulations respecting mining in the Colonies have reference particularly to mining for gold and silver, it may be here observed that grants by the Crown (or Government) of land in the Colonies (as in

Minerals.

The miscellaneous receipt includes dead or certain rents under leases of "minerals" generally where there have been no workings and royalties from umber and rotten stone.

VI.

DEAR SIR,

Ecclesiastical Commission, 10, Whitehall Place, London, S.W. 15th July 1892. In accordance with the arrangement made with you on the 28th ultimo, I have now the pleasure to enclose a continuation of Parliamentary Return No. 227, Session 1888, for the years ending 31st March 1888, 1889, and 1890.

It should be borne in mind that the amounts under Nos. 7 and 8 include rents od foreign coal as well as on coal the produce of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners' own mines.

Royal Commission on Mining Royalties, 6, Old Palace Yard, Westminster, S.W.

Year Ending

APPENDIX B.

I am, &c.,

(Signed) A. DE BOCK PORTER. Herbert Lyon, Esq.,

COUNTY OF DURHAM.

Mineral Rents, Royalties, Wayleaves, &c.

1.

IN EUROPE.

Coal.

£

£ 31st March, 191,624 1,200 1888. 31st March, 1889. 31st March,216,532| 1890.

199,677 1,200 1,265

[blocks in formation]

Ownership.

DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE MINING LAWS OF INDIA AND THE COLONIES.

NOTES ON MINING AND THE LAW AS TO OWNERSHIP OF MINERALS IN INDIA
and handed in by MR. WALMESLEY.

[blocks in formation]

In Crown under customary estates (not under Bishop's Lands).

Lead

Ore, &c.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

£

£

£

£

£ 1,775 5,282 4,208 17.753

15,461

1,981 5,588 4,125 18,282 15,935 2,34 1' 5,463 5310 19,202 15,213

England) will not pass gold or silver mines therein unless an intention to transfer them is expressed or necessarily implied (Woolley v. Attorney-General of Victoria, 2 App. Cas. 163, and Attorney-General of British Columbia v. Attorney General of Canada, 14 App. Cas. 295). The notes in the 3rd column, as to the ownership of the mines, must, therefore, usually be taken as applicable only to mines other than gold and silver.

It must also be understood that the notes as to the ownership of mines given in this statement have reference to lands which have been alienated by the Crown (except where otherwise stated), and not to the waste, unoccupied, and uncultivated tracts of land, or to the specially reserved mining districts, which in many of the Colonies still remain unalienated in the Crown.

Remarks.

and Shaft

Rents, &c.

Acquired by purchase from the Duke of Athol (5 Geo. III., c. 26. A.D. 1765).

[ocr errors]

1. Ceylon

2. Cyprus

Name.

[blocks in formation]

Plumbago
1ron.

A little coal.
Precious stones.

Silver
Copper.

Central Provinces

British Burma

Madras

Mysore

Bombay

Minerals.

IN ASIA.

Minerals.

N.B.-Under the Ottoman law there are mines, e.g., gold, silver, lead, iron, coal, &c.; minières, i.e, mineral matters got by surface work; and carrières, marbles, &c. (not within law).

Mines cannot be worked but by virtue of an Imperial Iradé. This gives a concession for 99 years, during which period the mines may pass by inheritance or sale (but by sale only under official authorisation).

Persons may search for mines on their own lands, and also on those of others, with their authorisation but not without, except by special official authorisation.

Coal and other minerals in
large quantities.

On obtaining a concession the concessionnaire pays from 50l. to 200l. (Turk) according to the value of the mines. He afterwards pays two species of redevenance-1st, of 5 paras per deunum of land comprised in the concession (payable to the owner); 2nd, the redevenance proper, which varies from 1 to 5 per cent., according to the richness of the mine, and is fixed in the firman of concession.-(Legislation Ottomane droit Administratif, 1875).

Limestone, some coal and iron
Some iron, but no minerals of
importance.

Lead, copper, iron

Rock-salt, some coal of poor
quality.

Coal and iron

Tin, petroleum, some iron

Gold, iron, &c.

Gold

The Cyprus Ordinance No. 5, above mentioned, enacted (inter alia) —

1st. That concessions should be under the hand of the High Commissioner and the seal of Cyprus instead of an Imperial Iradé. 2nd. That the High Commissioner in Council might suspend the provisions of the regulations of the Ottoman law providing for payment of a fixed surface reut.

3rd. That the rents and royalties payable to Government should be paid into the Island treasury.

Ownership.

In Crown

Some iron, but no mines of
importance.

In surface owner (except where
there has been a specific
reservation to the Crown). -

Remarks.

Ownership.

No one is permitted to gem on
Crown lands without a license.
(Ceylon Ordinance No. 7,
1882.) There do not seem
to be any acts or regulations
relating to mines of coal or
metals.

The right to mines, &c., in
unalienated lands has been
reserved to the Government
from recent dates in various
provinces. In the case of
lands previously alienated
by the Government in those
provinces and in the case of
the other provinces (without
special reservations), the
mines belong to the surface

owner.

Under Cyprus Ordinance No. 5
(amending Ottoman Law
dated 4 Mouharem, 1286),
being regulations as to mines
and metallic substances, and
the granting of concessions
and licenses to search for,
win, work, and get the same.

Remarks.

See the Anglo-Indian Codes-
Whitley Stokes (1887), vol. i.
p. 727.

* There were 105 collieries in Bengal in the year 1887, of which 62 were worked during that year, with a total output of 1,319,090 tons, as compared with 1,186,802 tons in 1886.

The total yield of all Indian coal-fields was 1,560,393 tons in 1887, and 1,703,830 tons in 1888.

In the Bengal coal-field collieries are worked entirely by companies and other private owners.— -(" Moral and Material Progress and Condition of India, 1887-1888.")

N.B.-In Bengal.-The road cess is to be levied on mines, amongst other property.-(Bengal, Act IX. of 1880, s. 6.)

In the Central Provinces.-The right to mines, minerals, coals, quarries, fisheries, and sap from palmyra and cocoa-nut trees are to be reserved to Government from future grants, provision being made for compensation for damage to surface owners.— (Central Provinces Code, Act No. 18 of 1881, sec. 151.)

In Bombay.-Mines and minerals in all unalienated lands to be reserved to Government (subsisting rights of occupants not to be affected)-(Bombay Code, Act No. 5 of 1879, sec. 69.)

In the Punjab.—Mines of metal or coal and gold-washings shall in every case be deemed to be the property of Government. But if Government works, or causes to be worked, any such mines, compensation for damage to the surface of the soil shall be made to the owner of such surface.-(Punjab Code, Act No. 33 of 1871, sec. 29.)

In Ajmer and Merwára.-Except in the case of lands in respect of which istimrárí sanads (perpetual grants) have been granted by the Chief Commissioner with the previous sanction of the Governor-General in Council, the Government shall be presumed, until the contrary is proved, to be the sole owner of all mines, opened and unopened, of metal, coal, and other valuable minerals, with full liberty to search for and work the same. Compensation to be made for damage caused to the surfac owner; the amount to be determined by the revenue officer.-(Ajmer Land and Revenue, Reg. II. of 1877, sec. 3 (A).)

In British Burma.-A landholder shall have a permanent heritable and transferable right of use and subject only

ccupancy in his lard.

(a) To payment of revenue taxes, cesses and rates, &c.

Appendix B.

INDIA AND THE COLONIES. Notes on

Mining Laws by Mr. Walmesley.

Appendix B.

INDIA AND THE

COLONIES. Notes on

Mining Laws by Mr. Walmesley.

(b) To the reservation in favour of Government of all mines and mineral products, and of all buried treasure, with full liberty to work and search for the same, paying to the landholder only compensation for surface damage as estimated by the revenue officer. (British Burma Code, Act No. of 1876, sec. 8.)

No duty or royalty appears at present to be charged for tin in the Mergui district, where the workings are carried on by Chinese. -(Report by T. W. H. Hughes, August 1889-India Office.)

Name.

Upper Burma

5. Labuan

Name.

6. Straits Settlements Tin
Perak.

Name.

1. Cape Colony

2. Basutoland

[ocr errors]

Name.

Precious stones

Coal

N.B.-All land in this country is now leased by the Government for 999 years, subject to the reservation of coal and other minerals to the Crown, its grantees, lessees, or licensees.-(Labuan Ordinance No. 2 of 1863.)

The Labuan Coal Company have certain rights to purchase lands in fee-simple which are reserved by the last-mentioned Ordinance. Prior to an Act passed in 1849, the grants of land were made without reservation of minerals or royalties to Government; but in the case of lands held under grants made between 1849 and 1863, the coals and minerals are to be held subject to a royalty to be fixed by the Governor.

3. British Bechuana-
land.

Minerals.

Minerals.

Minerals.

Gold
Silver.

Precious stones.
Copper.

Iron.

N.B.-Mining for tin in Perak has greatly developed within the last ten years, chiefly through encouraging Chinese immigration.

Prospecting licenses are given (for $25) for six months over areas not exceeding 320 acres.

Permits to mine are given (annual fee $2) to dig for tin over areas of five acres.

Mining leases for 21 years, not exceeding 25 acres in one block, or more in special cases. Lessee bound to open and work and employ a certain number of miners without intermission, and to pay export duties; also to pay fees, including an annual quit rent of $1 per acre. The export duty is equivalent to 10 or 11 per cent. on the value of the metal. (See "Report on Tin Mining in Perak and in Burma," W. T. Hall, and "Preliminary Sketch cf Tin Mining in Perak and in Burma," T. W. H. Hughes, Superintendent, Government Survey, India, January 1889, and by the latter, August 1889.)

AFRICA.

Minerals.

Precious stones
Gold.

Silver.
Platinum.

In Crown, special regulations
as to rubies and other precious
stones were made by Reg.
No. XII. of 1887. (Burma
Code, 1889, p. 451.)

In Crown, except as to lands
granted to the Labuan Coal
Company, and other lands
granted prior to 1849.

Ownership.

[ocr errors]

Ownership.

Apparently in Crown when
not specially granted before
1885.

Ownership.

In the surface owner, unless
specifically reserved to the
Crown.

"A seven years' lease of the Government monopoly of rubies has been granted. The terms of the lease and the regulations concerning the mines safeguard the rights of the ruby mines' residents to work their claims on the old system, and to have new claims so long as they pay the prescribed royalty on all rubies and sapphires they raise." ("Progress and Condition of India, 1887-8.")

N.B.-Where the mines are not reserved to the Crown the owner of any private property (not subject to a reservation of minerals) on which diggings or mines are proclaimed is to pay 10 per cent. of any rents or royalties received by him to Government for the maintenance of order and good government and protection of life and limb within his mining district.-(Cape of Good Hope Act, No. 19 of 1883, sec. 77.)

Ownership.

As in Cape Colony

Remarks.

Where the mines have been reserved to the Crown the owner of the surface has special privileges with respect to the mines, e.g., he may prospect without license, refuse consent to licensed persons to prospect on his land unless it is situate in a properly constituted " mining district," in which case, also, he has special privileges, including the right to claim certain portions of the mine free from Crown royalty.—(Cape of Good Hope Act, No. 44 of 1887, sec. 5.)

Remarks.

Tracts known to contain metalliferous deposits for which no lease or other sufficient title previously issued to be considered as Government reserves. (Perak Government General Land Reg., Jan. 31st, 1885, cl. 35.)

Remarks.

Apparently native chiefs have power to make regulations, and at present permission to search for minerals and precious stones is refused. (Report of Resident Commissioner for 1889, Colonial Office Reports, 1890, No. 70.)

Remarks.

Provisions for prospecting licenses and leases of minerals, under proclamation of Sir Hercules Robinson, 25th April 1889 (63 B.B. 1889.)

N.B.-The prospecting licenses do not give any right to prospect on private property without the consent of the owner of such property, and the person prospecting has in any case to give security to make good surface damage. The Proclamation only

applies to gold, silver, and platinum. As regards precious stones, Division I. of Act No. 19 of the Cape of Good Hope (of 1883) Appendix B. is in force throughout British Bechuanaland.—(See Proclamation, 63 B.B. 1889, above referred to.)

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

[blocks in formation]

No reservation of gold, silver, iron, copper, or
other mines or minerals shall be inserted in any
patent from the Crown granting any portion
of the Dominion lands (Statutes of Canada,
35th Vict. (1872) c. 23.

This Act applies exclusively to the lands included
in Manitoba and the North-West Territories).
Any person may explore for mines or minerals on
any unclaimed or unoccupied Dominion lands
and may purchase mining locations of 320 acres
(80 x 40 chs.) 160 acres (40 chs. sq.) or 80 acres
(40 × 20 chs.) at the same price as farming lands,
viz., $1 per acre (same Act, ss. 38 and 40) but
the Secretary of State may exempt certain lands
from sale (s. 41).

And in case of certain lands proving rich in
minerals the Secretary of State may withdraw
such lands from sale and in lieu thereof institute
a system of lease; the rent payable to the Crown
under any such lease to be a royalty not to
exceed 2 per cent. on the net profits of working
(same Act, s. 38).

The Act also contains special provisions as to coal
lands, under which claims may be made before
survey entitling the claimants to occupy any
number of acres not exceeding 640 on payment
of $1 per acre, and entitling them to patents if
the mines are continuously worked up to the
survey; but the Secretary of State with the view
of preventing undue monopoly in coal lands may
exempt such lands from sale and settlement
under the Act (same Act, ss. 43 to 45).

Recently Mr. Lockwood, who owned 80,000 acres of auriferous lands in the province of Quebec, sold 8,000 acies of them to Messrs. McArthur Bros. & Co. for $8,000. Shortly afterwards Messrs. McArthur Bros. & Co. sold a portion only of these 8,000 acres for $50,000.-(“ Canada," 1889.)

N.B.-The royalties are fixed by statute as follows:

On gold and silver 2 per cent. on gross output (and an annual charge of $2 per area-100 ft. by 150 ft.--if mines not worked).
On coal 97 cents per ton up to 250,000 tons per annum, 6,4 cents afterwards (slack and consumption at works free).

On copper 4 cents upon each 1 per cent. of copper contained in a ton of ore sold or smelted.

On lead 2 cents on ditto.

On iron 5 cents per ton of ore sold or smelted.

On tin and precious stones 5 per cent. of their value. (1884 and 1887 Revised Statutes of Nova Scotia, 5th series.)

INDIA AND THE

COLONIES. Notes on Mining Laws by Mr. Walmesley.

« PreviousContinue »