Trust and GovernanceValerie Braithwaite, Margaret Levi Russell Sage Foundation, 1998 M08 13 - 400 pages An effective democratic society depends on the confidence citizens place in their government. Payment of taxes, acceptance of legislative and judicial decisions, compliance with social service programs, and support of military objectives are but some examples of the need for public cooperation with state demands. At the same time, voters expect their officials to behave ethically and responsibly. To those seeking to understand—and to improve—this mutual responsiveness, Trust and Governance provides a wide-ranging inquiry into the role of trust in civic life. Trust and Governance asks several important questions: Is trust really essential to good governance, or are strong laws more important? What leads people either to trust or to distrust government, and what makes officials decide to be trustworthy? Can too much trust render the public vulnerable to government corruption, and if so what safeguards are necessary? In approaching these questions, the contributors draw upon an abundance of historical and current resources to offer a variety of perspectives on the role of trust in government. For some, trust between citizens and government is a rational compact based on a fair exchange of information and the public's ability to evaluate government performance. Levi and Daunton each examine how the establishment of clear goals and accountability procedures within government agencies facilitates greater public commitment, evidence that a strong government can itself be a source of trust. Conversely, Jennings and Peel offer two cases in which loss of citizen confidence resulted from the administration of seemingly unresponsive, punitive social service programs. Other contributors to Trust and Governance view trust as a social bonding, wherein the public's emotional investment in government becomes more important than their ability to measure its performance. The sense of being trusted by voters can itself be a powerful incentive for elected officials to behave ethically, as Blackburn, Brennan, and Pettit each demonstrate. Other authors explore how a sense of communal identity and shared values make citizens more likely to eschew their own self-interest and favor the government as a source of collective good. Underlying many of these essays is the assumption that regulatory institutions are necessary to protect citizens from the worst effects of misplaced trust. Trust and Governance offers evidence that the jurisdictional level at which people and government interact—be it federal, state, or local—is fundamental to whether trust is rationally or socially based. Although social trust is more prevalent at the local level, both forms of trust may be essential to a healthy society. Enriched by perspectives from political science, sociology, psychology, economics, history, and philosophy, Trust and Governance opens a new dialogue on the role of trust in the vital relationship between citizenry and government. A Volume in the Russell Sage Foundation's Series on Trust. |
Contents
1 | |
7 | |
Part II What Difference Does a Rrustworthy State Make? | 75 |
Part III How Trust Affects Representative Democracy | 195 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actors agents argue attitudes Australian Australian National University authorities behavior belief benefits Braithwaite Cambridge Center central chapter citizens civil society cognitive communal trust norms compliance constituents cooperation decisions deference democracy democratic distrust duty economic edited enterprises ernment evaluations example exchange trust norms expectations Geoffrey Brennan groups Hardin harmony values important Inala incentives income tax increase indirect taxes individuals industrial institutionalization institutions interpersonal trust John Braithwaite Journal judgments Margaret Levi Mark Peel markets ment motives National Election Studies national government officials organizations outcome Oxford percent personal trust Pettit Philip Pettit predict private investment problems relationships reliance predicament rely republican Research revenue risk role Scholz sense Simon Blackburn social capital Social Psychology Songjiang strong taxation taxpayers theory tion tive trust as confidence trust heuristics trust in government trustworthiness Tyler University Press vote Wenzhou Yueqing