American Law Reports Annotated, Volume 6Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1920 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 24
... tion , and this solely on account of an unnatural and perverted view of what constitutes purity of the marital rela- tion . While the refusal to have sexual intercourse is not of itself legal cruel- ty , within the meaning of our ...
... tion , and this solely on account of an unnatural and perverted view of what constitutes purity of the marital rela- tion . While the refusal to have sexual intercourse is not of itself legal cruel- ty , within the meaning of our ...
Page 37
... tion of this character . But still further facts are established which it is claimed materially qualify the force of those last recited . It ap- pears that the appellant was guilty of adultery before the respondent , al- though not ...
... tion of this character . But still further facts are established which it is claimed materially qualify the force of those last recited . It ap- pears that the appellant was guilty of adultery before the respondent , al- though not ...
Page 39
... tion of a young lady in Montreal who signs herself ' Jim . ' Passages in a let- ter written by this person to the plain- tiff ( which came to the house of the mother - in - law in England after the plaintiff left , and was forwarded to ...
... tion of a young lady in Montreal who signs herself ' Jim . ' Passages in a let- ter written by this person to the plain- tiff ( which came to the house of the mother - in - law in England after the plaintiff left , and was forwarded to ...
Page 44
... tion for divorce pending , it is imma- terial what brought about the separa- tion , the court further saying that Hawes v . Hawes ( Ga . ) supra , does not conflict with this view of the section , and if so the remark is obiter . The re ...
... tion for divorce pending , it is imma- terial what brought about the separa- tion , the court further saying that Hawes v . Hawes ( Ga . ) supra , does not conflict with this view of the section , and if so the remark is obiter . The re ...
Page 145
... tion from the contract price where a builder openly violated the agreement was what it would cost to make the building conform to what the con- tractor agreed it should be , saying : " When the building has been com- pleted , but ...
... tion from the contract price where a builder openly violated the agreement was what it would cost to make the building conform to what the con- tractor agreed it should be , saying : " When the building has been com- pleted , but ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent agreement alimony alleged amount appeared appellant Asso automobile bailee Bank broker cause cause of action claim contract cotenant court held court of equity creditors damages death decree deed defendant duty entitled equity estopped estoppel evidence fact fence fendant foreclosure fraud grant grantor Hubble husband injury insured intestate Iowa judgment jury land liable ment Minn mortgage N. J. Eq N. Y. Supp negligence Negotiable Instruments Okla opinion ordinance owner paid parties payment person plaintiff plaintiff in error principal purchase question reason recover refused replevin rule running at large separate maintenance signature statute street suit supra testimony thereof tiff tion trial court ultra vires valid verdict wife wife's
Popular passages
Page 273 - A holder in due course holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties, and free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves, and may enforce payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon.
Page 448 - To constitute notice of an infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating the same, the person to whom it is negotiated must have had actual knowledge of the infirmity or defect, or knowledge of such facts that his action in taking the instrument amounted to bad faith.
Page 558 - ... in the case of partial incapacity the weekly payment shall in no case exceed the difference between the amount of the average weekly earnings of the workman before the accident and the average weekly amount which he is earning or is able to earn in some suitable employment or business after the accident...
Page 242 - That it is complete and regular upon its face; 2. That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; 3. That he took it in good faith and for value; 4. That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 359 - Whenever the commission shall have reason to believe that any such person, partnership, or corporation has been or is using any unfair method of competition in commerce, and if it shall appear to the commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public...
Page 591 - Act, shall not be liable to attachment, garnishment, or other process, and shall not be seized, taken, appropriated, or applied by any legal or equitable process, or...
Page 467 - In an action to recover the possession of personal property, judgment for the plaintiff may be for the possession or the value thereof, in case a delivery cannot be had, and damages for the detention. If the property has been delivered to the plaintiff, and the defendant claim a return thereof, judgment for the defendant may be for a return of the property or the value thereof, in case a return cannot be had, and damages for taking and withholding the same.
Page 210 - Nevertheless, notwithstanding the logical form of the objection, there are more powerful considerations on the other side. In the first place, it is established by a series of cases that an ulterior public advantage may justify a comparatively insignificant taking of private property for what, in its immediate purpose, is a private use.
Page 287 - A trustee may not use or deal with the trust property for his own profit, or for any other purpose unconnected with the trust, in any manner.
Page 98 - When a person affixes his property to the land of another, without an agreement permitting him to remove it, the thing affixed, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, belongs to the owner of the land, unless he chooses to require the former to remove it or the former elects to exercise the right of removal provided for in Section 1013.5 of this chapter.