The New York Supplement

Officers

211 NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT

ing examinations for office.-Ottinger v. Civil Service Commission, 240 N. Y. 435, 148 N. E. 627.

III. RIGHTS, POWERS, DUTIES, AND
LIABILITIES.

110 (N.Y.) Unless otherwise prescribed by statute, duty of public official charged with carrying it out continues after passage of time within which it was contemplated he would act. -Ottinger v. Voorhis, 241 N. Y. 49, 148 N. E. 784.

PARENT AND CHILD.

See Guardian and Ward.

PARTNERSHIP.

V. RETIREMENT AND ADMISSION OF PARTNERS.

230 (N.Y.Sup.) Agreement of partner on dissolution of partnership not to engage in similar business within five square blocks thereof construed to forbid locating in fifth square block from site of business; "square block."Bernfeld v. Freedenberg, 211 N. Y. S. 692.

239 (4) (N.Y.Sup.) Although creditor of partnership knows assumption of existing obligations by another, he is not required to proceed first against party assuming obligations. -Advance Rubber Co. v. Bershad, 211 N. Y. S. 574.

2(1) (N.Y.) State's jurisdiction to regulate custody of infants not dependent on dom-239 (5) (N.Y.Sup.) Failure to sue held maicile of parents.-Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. terial alteration in nature or time of payment, 429, 148 N. E. 624. releasing partner whose obligation has been assumed from liability therefor.-Advance Rubber Co. v. Bershad, 211 N. Y. S. 574.

2(3) (N.Y.) Equity not concerned with parental disputes.-Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N.

Y. 429, 148 N. E. 624.

2(4) (N.Y.) Residence of child not used as pretense for adjudication of status of parents residing elsewhere.-Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429, 148 N. E. 624.

Except when incident to divorce or separation, custody of children is regulated by habeas corpus, or petition to chancellor.-Id.

Husband's remedy by petition to chancellor for custody of children unaffected by habeas

corpus act.--Id.

5(4) (N.Y.Sup.) Infant continuing in employment to end of term, after employer discovered his misdelivery of goods, entitled father to recover infant's wages.-Weiner v. Weinberg & Witt, 211 N. Y. S. 48.

6 (N.Y.Sup.) Infant's employer held not entitled to affirmative judgment on counterclaim for infant's misdelivery, in father's action for infant's wages.-Weiner v. Weinberg & Witt, 211 N. Y. S. 48.

13(1) (N.Y.Sup.) That infant went into employer's service with father's consent held not to make father liable for his malfeasance or misfeasance on theory of agency.-Weiner v. Weinberg & Witt, 211 N. Y. S. 48.

For pleadings in particular actions or proceed-
ings, see also the various specific topics.
For review of rulings relating to pleadings, see
Appeal.

I. FORM AND ALLEGATIONS IN GENERAL. 8(2) (N.Y.Sup.) Defense held subject to motion to strike out, for failure to set forth ultimate facts on which defendant relied.-AbtBernot, Inc., v. Holland-American Line, 211 N. Y. S. 736.

(A) Right of Action and Defenses. 12(1) (N.Y.Sup.) Persons interested under will, in which there was equitable conversion of land, cannot maintain action in partition.-8(2) (N.Y.Sup.) Defense held defective beAllison v. Coffin, 211 N. Y. S. 545.

(B) Proceedings and Relief. 55(1) (N.Y.) Complaint of divorced wife to partition, property to which she and former husband took title as tenants by entirety, held to state cause of action.-Yax v. Yax, 240 N. Y. 590, 148 N. E. 717.

cause of failure to set out facts on which defenses were founded with respect to excepting clauses in bill of lading.-Washington Dean Co. v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha, 211 N. Y. S. 737.

16 (N.Y.Sup.) Defense held subject to motion to strike out, as hypothetical.-Abt-Bernot, Inc., v. Holland-American Line, 211 N. Y. S. 736.

INDEX-DIGEST

Principal and Agent

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

PLEADINGS AND REPLEADER.

16 (N.Y.Sup.) Hypothetical defense set up VI. AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL in answer held defective.-Washington Dean Co. v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha, 211 N. Y. S. 737.277 (N.Y.App.Div.) Assignment of claim 20 (N.Y.Sup.) Alternative plea held sub- after action is brought is not proper ground ject to motion to strike out.-Abt-Bernot, Inc., for permitting supplemental pleading.-Mackay v. Holland-American Line, 211 N. Y. S. 736. v. Treat, 211 N. Y. S. 19.

20 (N.Y.Sup.) Answer pleading in alternative held insufficient.-Washington Dean Co. v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha, 211 N. Y. S. 737.

27 (N.Y.) Necessary to allege meaning of technical terms of contract.-Zimmerman v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co., 240 N. Y. 501, 148 N. E. 659.

34(1) (N.Y.Sup.) Sufficiency of complaints determined from inspection of pleadings alone. -Sliosberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., 211 N. Y. S. 270.

XI. MOTIONS.

345(1) (N.Y.App.Div.) Answer held to raise issues, and denial of motion to strike out denials and for partial judgment was proper.-Rahe Match Co. v. World Match Corporation, 211 N. Y. S. 425.

347 (N.Y.Sup.) Motion to strike out irrelevant matter available, though it embraces entire count pleaded as separate defense, and resort to motion for judgment not necessary.Hall v. U. S. Casualty Co., 211 N. Y. S. 741.

34(1) (N.Y.Sup.) Pleader allowed more latitude in equity than in action at law.-Rodg-350 (3) (N.Y.App.Div.) Validity of defense ers v. Rodgers, 211 N. Y. S. 864.

II. DECLARATION, COMPLAINT, PETI-
TION, OR STATEMENT.

by statutory tenant's widow alleging legal possession under executors, not determined on motion for judgment on pleading.-Stern v. Mautner, 211 N. Y. S. 223.

350 (3) (N.Y.Sup.) Motion for judgment on Hearn v. Leary, 211 N. Y. S. 668. pleadings determined solely on pleadings.

51 (N.Y.) Allegations in cause of action for possession of realty should not be incorporated in separate cause of action on purchase-money held to note.-Trembath v. Berner, 240 N. Y. 617, 148354(2) (N.Y.App.Div.) Answer raise issues, and denial of motion to strike out denials and for partial judgment was proper-Rahe Match Co. v. World Match Corporation, 211 N. Y. S. 425.

N. E. 729.

52(2) (N.Y.Sup.) Causes of action on two independent contracts should be separately stated. James Rees & Sons Co. v. Angel, 211 N. Y.

S. 817.

Inclusion of claim for "extras," performed under contract sued on, held not improper.-Id.

54 (N.Y.Sup.) Allegations contained in separately numbered paragraph of one cause of action may be incorporated as a whole in another cause by mere reference.-James Rees & Sons Co. v. Angel, 211 N. Y. S. 817. Incorporation by reference of allegation of paragraph containing two causes of action proper. Id.

355 (N.Y.Sup.) Motion to strike out irrelevant matter available, though it embraces entire count pleaded as separate defense.-Hall v. U. S. Casualty Co., 211 N. Y. S. 741.

Paragraph of answer, setting up dishonesty of plaintiff's employee, not associating such dishonesty with plaintiffs or charging them with responsibility, held irrelevant and subject to motion to strike out.-Id. im-362 (2) (N.Y.Sup.) Motions to dismiss suit as against defendant administratrix individually and strike out certain allegations of complaint denied, so as to permit full determination of entire controversy between estates.Rodgers v. Rodgers, 211 N. Y. S. 864.

67 (N.Y.App.Div.) Misrepresentations or mutual mistake in agreement held matters of defense, not affecting validity of complaint. Rahe Match Co. v. World Match Corporation,

211 N. Y. S. 425.

III. PLEA OR ANSWER, CROSS-COM-
PLAINT, AND AFFIDAVIT OF

DEFENSE.

364 (2) (N.Y.Sup.) "Irrelevant allegation" defined.-Hall v. U. S. Casualty Co., 211 N. Y. S. 741.

Test which may be applied to determine relevancy of pleading on motion to strike out is whether, on trial, evidence of facts pleaded

(B) Dilatory Pleas and Matter in Abate- could be legally received.-Id.

ment.

106 (2) (N.Y.Sup.) Plea of another action pending is plea in abatement; plea of election of remedies is plea in bar.-Zurlick v. Stankus, 211 N. Y. S. 342.

(D) Matter in Avoidance.

PLEDGES.

25 (N.Y.Mun.Ct.) Property pledged by indorser held not released by failure of presentment.-Reynolds v. Doyle, 211 N. Y. S. 509.

POLICE POWER.

131 (N.Y.Sup.) Plea of confession and avoidance requires definite admission, and statement of ultimate facts exonerating de- See Municipal Corporations, 601-621. fendant from liability.-Abt-Bernot, Inc., v. Holland-American Line, 211 N. Y. S. 736.

IV. REPLICATION OR REPLY AND SUBSE-
QUENT PLEADINGS.

182 (N.Y.Sup.) Plaintiff, on failure to reply to counterclaim, held entitled to have default opened, and defendant not entitled to

PRACTICE.

For practice in particular actions and proceedings, see the various specific topics.

PRESCRIPTION.

affirmative relief.-210 West Fifty-Sixth St. See Limitation of Actions. Co. v. Pantinakis, 211 N. Y. S. 851.

Failure to reply to counterclaim may be deemed admission of facts alleged, but not of pleader's conclusions.-Id.

PRINCIPAL AND AGENT.

See Attorney and Client; Brokers; Factors.

Principal and Agent

211 NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT

III. RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES AS TO THIRD PERSONS.

(A) Powers of Agent. 109(1) (N.Y.Sup.) General power to manage property does not include authority to bind owner to negotiable commercial paper. -Dodds v. McColgan, 211 N. Y. S. 371.

REAL ACTIONS.

See Ejectment; Partition.

REFERENCE.

I. NATURE, GROUNDS, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE.

126(2) (N.Y.Sup.) That agent of buyer 7(1) (N.Y.App.Div.) Issues of law raised was stated to be buyer in paper containing by objections to executrix's account and order terms of agreement held immaterial.-Schneid- to show cause should be determined by surroman v. Shapiro, 211 N. Y. S. 647.

PRINCIPAL AND SURETY.

III. DISCHARGE OF SURETY.

125 (N.Y.Sup.) Mere indulgence by creditor of principal debtor will not discharge surety. -Advance Rubber Co. v. Bershad, 211 N. Y. S. 574.

PROHIBITION.

See Intoxicating Liquors.

PROMISSORY NOTES.

See Bills and Notes.

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.

See Municipal Corporations, 2732-525.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONS.

gate. In re Miller's Will, 211 N. Y. S. 874.

8(1) (N.Y.) Compulsory reference not ordered on showing that several items of an account will become centers of independent controversy.-Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York, 240 N. Y. 465, 148 N. E. 637. Plaintiff held not entitled to compulsory reference.-Id.

8(6) (N.Y.) Reference not justified, because defendant had put plaintiff to its proofs. -Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York, 240 N. Y. 465, 148 N. E. 637.

27 (N.Y.) Plaintiff has burden of satisfying court that something more than mere examination of a long account will be involved. -Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York, 240 N. Y. 465, 148 N. E. 637.

See Domicile.

7 (N.Y.App.Div.) Utility entitled to rea- See Taxation. sonable return on value of property in public service at time of inquiry.-People ex rel. Peo

ple's Gas & Electric Co. of Oswego v. Public See Appeal. Service Commission, 211 N. Y. S. 662.

Determination which fails to properly appraise reproduction cost of utility is erroneous. -Id.

Going value of utility is element in fixing rates.-Id.

95 (6) (N.Y.Sup.) Statutory duty of railroad to maintain bridge carrying street across tracks includes approaches.-In re Henner, 211 N. Y. S. 334.

New bridge erected over railroad tracks to give railroad greater clearance is deemed erected at railroad's expense as of date of original bridge. Id.

C95 (7) (N.Y.Sup.) Statute requiring railroad to restore street crossed by tracks held part of contract for railroad's erection of bridge over tracks, and railroad's duties were continuous. In re Henner, 211 N. Y. S. 334.

X. OPERATION.

(B) Statutory, Municipal, and Official Regulations.

243 (N.Y.Sup.) Village not authorized to enact ordinance requiring gates at crossing, in view of order of Public Service Commission.Village of Elmira Heights v. Erie R. Co., 211 N. Y. S. 893.

RESIDENCE.

REVENUE.

REVIEW.

REVIVAL.

See Abatement and Revival, ~72.

RIPARIAN RIGHTS.

See Waters and Water Courses, 42.

I. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY OF CONTRACT.

23(3) (N.Y.Sup.) Contract obligating seller to pay freight to inland city held consummated by cable.-Jacobsen v. Bond, 211 N. Y. S. 819.

II. CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT.

79 (N.Y.) Delivery of goods not specified must be made a vendor's place of business before agreed date.-Zimmerman v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co., 240 N. Y. 501, 148 N. E. 659.

81(1) (N.Y.App.Div.) Statement of time goods expected to arrive not a warranty.Eitingon-Schild Co. v. Friedman, 211 N. Y. S. 208.

Seller's letter, accompanying invoice, stating that seller expected goods to arrive some time in April, held part of contract.-Id.

IV. PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT. (C) Delivery and Acceptance of Goods.

of 164 (N.Y.App.Div.) Proof of tender pieces of cloth averaging 514 yards each was not substantial compliance with contract call

INDEX-DIGEST

Schools and School Dists.

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
ing for 60 yards.-Beals v. Hirsch, 211 N. Y. | claim held not diversion of common school
S. 293.
funds. Board of Education of City of Oneida
Seller must tender quantity called for by buy-v. Tuttle, 211 N. Y. S. 413.
er, in order to bind buyer.-Id.

168(1) (N.Y.App.Div.) Buyer entitled to
refuse to accept goods, unless given oppor-
tunity to inspect them.-Beals v. Hirsch, 211
N. Y. S. 293.

(D) Payment of Price.

46 (N.Y.Sup.) Education Law, conferring
judicial powers on commissioner of education,
not unconstitutional.-Board of Education of
City of Oneida v. Tuttle, 211 N. Y. S. 413.

191 (N.Y.Sup.) Directing verdict for de-59 (N.Y.Sup.) Adoption of statute as by-
fendant on theory that check constituting pay-law held not supplementing of statute, where
ment on account was given as deposit held er- latter self-executing.-Nicol v. Board of Edu-
ror.-Murman v. Manning, 211 N. Y. S. 575. cation of City of New York, 211 N. Y. S. 749.
Invalid by-law of board of education of
Greater New York not continued in force by
saving clause in repeal statute.-Id.

VI. WARRANTIES.

274 (N.Y.) Seller of condensed milk liable
on warranty that it is of merchantable quality.
-J. Aron & Co. v. Sills, 240 N. Y. 588, 148 N.

E. 717.

285(2) (N.Y.Sup.) Notice that shoes were
not according to contract held not given in
"reasonable time" as matter of law.-Silberman
v. Engel, 211 N. Y. S. 584.

288 (4) (N.Y.Sup.) Advantage of breach of
warranty held loss to buyer.-Ellis v. Allen,
211 N. Y. S. 488.

VII. REMEDIES OF SELLER.

(E) Actions for Price or Value.

61 (N.Y.Sup.) Petition to commissioner of
education need not recite all facts necessary
to show jurisdiction.-Board of Education of
City of Oneida v. Tuttle, 211 N. Y. S. 413.

63(1) (N.Y.Sup.) By-law of board of edu-
cation, in so far as it related to qualifications
of district superintendents of schools held a
futility.-Nicol v. Board of Education of City
of New York, 211 N. Y. S. 749.

Appointment of district superintendent of
schools under by-law of board of education of
city of Greater New York held invalid.--Id.
(D) District Property, Contracts, and Li-

abilities.

342 (N.Y.) Passing of title necessary be-
fore action on contract of sale.-Zimmerman v.79 (N.Y.Sup.) Board of education may con-
Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co., 240 N. tract for architectural services.-Pierce V.
Y. 501, 148 N. E. 659.
Board of Education of Union Free School
Dist. No. 12 of Towns of Ridgeway and Shelby,
211 N. Y. S. 788.

353(1) (N.Y.) Complaint for purchase
price of German marks held not to state cause
of action.-Zimmerman v. Roessler & Hass- 80(1) (N.Y.Sup.) Architects furnishing
lacher Chemical Co., 240 N. Y. 501, 148 N. E.
659.

VIII. REMEDIES OF BUYER.
(C) Actions for Breach of Contract.
418(3) (N.Y.) Damages, for failure of sell-
er to deliver held determined by market price
at time shipment should have arrived.-Schop-
flocher v. Zimmerman, 240 N. Y. 507, 148 N. E.
660.

IX. CONDITIONAL SALES.

451 (N.Y.App.Div.) Filing of conditional
sale contract, required by New York laws, not
directed to transactions in foreign state.-Goet-
schius v. Brightman, 211 N. Y. S. 763.
Foreign conditional sale contract held gov-
erned by law of foreign state.-Id.

465 (N.Y.App.Div.) Conditional vendor has
10 days to file contract in filing district to
which goods removed from foreign state.-
Goetschius v. Brightman, 211 N. Y. S. 763.

473(1) (N.Y.App.Div.) Vendor could re-
plevin goods from innocent purchaser.-Goet-
schius v. Brightman, 211 N. Y. S. 763.

SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
See Colleges and Universities.

plans for school buildings bound to know that
recovery for services was conditioned on ex-
pense coming within appropriation.-Pierce v.
Board of Education of Union Free School Dist.
No. 12 of Towns of Ridgeway and Shelby, 211
N. Y. S. 788.

Limitation as to costs in district resolution

binding on architects, contracting with board of
education to furnish plans and specifications.
-Id.

Board of education held to have accepted ar-
chitect's plans on condition that buildings could
be erected within estimated cost.-Id.

Board of education held warranted in relying
on architects' assurances as to accuracy of es-
timate of costs of building.-Id.

Approval of proposition to build school-
houses by district meeting held nullity, so far
as authorizing building at estimated cost ex-
ceeding amount specified in resolution.-Id.

85 (N.Y.Sup.) Board of education held jus-
tified in refusing to proceed under contract with
architects furnishing plans, etc., calling for
building costing considerably more than esti-
mated amount.-Pierce v. Board of Educa-
tion of Union Free School Dist. No. 12 of
Towns of Ridgeway and Shelby, 211 N. Y. S.
788.

86 (2) (N.Y.Sup.) Evidence held to show
employment of architects to prepare prelimi-
nary studies, etc., for proposed school build-
ings-Pierce v. Board of Education of Union
Free School Dist. No. 12 of Towns of Ridge-
way and Shelby, 211 N. Y. S. 788.

(E) District Debt, Securities, and

ation.

Tax.

III (N.Y.Sup.) Provision that board of ed-
ucation rules reviewable only by commissioner
of education inapplicable to taxpayer's suit to
enjoin improper use of funds, determination of

Schools and School Dists.

211 NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT

STATUTE OF FRAUDS.

constitutional questions, or illegal acts of offi-
cials.-Stein v. Brown, 211 N. Y. S. 822.

See Frauds, Statute of.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

(F) Claims Against District, and Actions.
112 (N.Y.Sup.) Appeal by clerk of board
of education, held ratified by board of educa- See Limitation of Actions.
tion.-Board of Education of City of Oneida
V. Tuttle, 211 N. Y. S. 413.

117 (N.Y.Sup.) Action brought against in-
dividuals as constituting board of education not
a suit against them as individuals, but as a
body. Stein v. Brown, 211 N. Y. S. 822.

(H) Pupils, and Conduct and Discipline of
Schools.

STATUTES.

For statutes relating to particular subjects, see
the various specific topics.

1. ENACTMENT, REQUISITES, AND VA-
LIDITY IN GENERAL.

47 (N.Y.App.Div.) Statute taxing moneyed
159 (N.Y.Sup.) Statute making district li-banks, held not invalid as indefinite.-People ex
capital coming into competition with national
able for instruction of pupils attending high rel. Broderick v. Goldfogle, 211 N. Y. S. 85.
school not unconstitutional as denial of due
process. Board of Education of City of Oneida
V. Tuttle, 211 N. Y. S. 413.

160 (N.Y.Sup.) Excusing children from
public schools for purpose of religious instruc-
tion held violation of compulsory education law,
and enjoined.-Stein v. Brown, 211 N. Y. S. 822.

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.

49 (N.Y.App.Div.) Statute taxing monered
capital coming into competition with national
banks, held not invalid as impracticable.-Peo-
ple ex rel. Broderick v. Goldfogle, 211 N. Y.
S. 85.

51 (N.Y.App.Div.) Statute taxing moneyed
capital competing with national banks held not
invalid because depending on federal statute.
-People ex rel. Broderick v. Goldfogle, 211 N.
Y. S. 85.

5 (N.Y.Sup.) Books seized without war: 63 (N.Y.Sup.) A nullity needs no repeal.
rant, but unmistakeably obscene within Penal-Nicol v. Board of Education of City of New
Law, should not be returned, and evidence sup- York, 211 N. Y. S. 749.
pressed.-People v. Pomerantz, 211 N. Y. S. 64(8) (N.Y.App.Div.) Invalid provisions of
national banks held severable.-People ex rel.
statute taxing moneyed capital competing with
Broderick v. Goldfogle, 211 N. Y. S. 85.

767.

7 (N.Y.App.Div.) Seizure of contraband
blackjack held not unreasonable, and motion to
suppress denied.-People v. Defore, 211 N. Y.

S. 134.

V. CLAIMS AGAINST STATE.
174 (N.Y.Ct.Cl.) Temporary shutting off
of millowner's water during improvement of
canal held mere trespass, for which right to
compensation was lost by failing seasonably to
file notice of claim.-American Woolen Co. v.
State, 211 N. Y. S. 149.

C184 (N.Y.App.Div.) Legislature can as-
sume or create obligation of state to pay
moral or equitable claim against state.-Wil-
liamsburgh Sav. Bank of Brooklyn, N. Y., v.
State, 211 N. Y. S. 420.

Act conferring jurisdiction on Court of Claims
to allow claim, if just, unconstitutional.-Id.

II. GENERAL AND SPECIAL OR LOCAL

LAWS.

76(1) (N.Y.) Local law may not operate to
set aside a general law.-Browne v. City of
New York, 241 N. Y. 96, 149 N. E. 211.

77(1) (N.Y.Sup.) Act providing for com-
mission to investigate titles to lands claimed
adversely to state in certain counties held not
local act.-McCarthy v. Moore, 211 N. Y. S.
731.

VI. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION.
(A) General Rules of Construction.

18(1) (N.Y.Sup.) Intent and purpose of
Legislature to be kept in mind in interpreting
statute.-Mott v. Reeves, 211 N. Y. S. 375.

228 (N.Y.Sup.) Saving clause, repugnant to
body of act, not given effect to render act de-
structive of itself.-Nicol v. Board of Educa-
tion of City of New York, 211 N. Y. S. 749.

STATUTES CONSTRUED.

CONSTITUTION.

Art. 1, § 6-148 N. E. 796, 241 N. Y. 81; 211
N. Y. S. 85, 134.

Art. 3, § 16-211 N. Y. S. 731.
Art. 3, §§ 21, 24-211 N. Y. S. 85.
Art. 5, § 9-148 N. E. 627, 240 N. Y. 435.
Art. 6, § 9-148 N. E. 727, 240 N. Y. 612; 148
N. E. 786, 241 N. Y. 55.
Art. 6, § 12-211 N. Y. S. 655.
Art. 8, § 9-211 N. Y. S. 85.
Art. 9, § 4-211 N. Y. S. 822.
Art. 12-149 N. E. 211, 241 N. Y. 96; 211 N.
Y. S. 306.

Art. 12, §§ 2, 3-7-211 N. Y. S. 306.
Art. 14-149 N. E. 211, 241 N. Y. 96; 211 N.
Y. S. 306.

Art. 14, § 1-211 N. Y. S. 306.

« Previous Continue »