...116 U. S. 325. He added, however: "From what has thus been said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without...and freights, the State cannot require a railroad company to carry persons and property without reward ; neither can it do that which in law amounts...

...reasonable rates. See Pennsylvania Railroad v. Miller, 132 US 75. It was also said that '4 Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward ; neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property...

...thus been said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limiiation or regulation is itself withont limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...railroad corporation to carry persons or property withont reward ; neither can it do that which in law amonnts to a taking of private property for public...

...interstate commerce." But it took care, also, to announce that "it is not to be Inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is Itself without...not a power to destroy, and limitation Is not the équivalent of confiscation. Under the pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot...

...or interstate commerce." But it took care also to announce that " it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under the pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad to carry persons...

...reasonable rates. See Railroad Co. v. Miller, 132 US 75, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 34. It was also said that, "under pretense of regulating fares and freights,...cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons and property without reward; neither can it do that which In the law amounts to a taking of private...

...who delivered the opinion of the Court: " From what has been said, it must not be inferred that this power of "limitation or regulation is itself without...pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State can not "require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward; "neither can it...

...reasonable has not been surrendered. From what has thus been said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry...

...Company, Chief Justice Waite said : " From what has thus been said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. 1 See the cases cited in the pre- Union Tel. Co. v. Axtell, 69 Ind. ceding section. 199; State v. Bell...

...unreasonable, or be in effect a taking of private property for public use without compensation. "The power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." 1 Difficult as it may be to fix the limit, we may presume that it would be transgressed by an act reducing...