CATHERINE E. PAWLING, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents, v. WILLIAM M. PAWLING et al., Appellants. Parling v. Parling, 86 Hun, 502, affirmed. (Argued October 7, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 17, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs · entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. Edward P. White for appellants. Z. S. Westbrook for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All concur. BURDETTE B. BROWN et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES Dow et al., Appellants. Brown v. Brown, 79 Hun, 44, affirmed. (Argued October 8, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered July 13, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee. William H. Henderson for appellants. Clarence A. Farnum for respondents. Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs. MARTIN D. CHACE, Respondent, v. WARSAW WATER WORKS COMPANY, Appellant. Chace v. Warsaw W. W. Co., 79 Hun, 151, affirmed. (Argued October 8, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 28, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee, but suspended for six months the operation of an injunction granted. Eugene M. Bartlett for appellant. Charles D. Newton for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, but the operation of the injunction is suspended for six months, on the opinion of BRADLEY, J., below. All concur, except HAIGHT, J., not sitting. FRANCIS H. BERGMANN et al., Respondents, v. HAMILTON H. SALMON et al., Executors, etc., Appellants. Bergmann v. Salmon, 79 Hun, 456, affirmed. (Argued October 8, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 6, 1894, which modified and as modified affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. Edward W. S. Johnston for appellants. Lloyd McK. Garrison for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. PETER M. WILSON, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellants. Wilson N. Y. El. R. R. Co., 9 Misc. Rep. 657, affirmed. (Argued October 9, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered September 11, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. William II. Godden for appellants. Ira D. Warren for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All concur. PHILLIP WOLFF et al., Respondents, . PAUL KUHNE, Appellant. Wolff v. Kuhne, 78 Hun, 613, affirmed. (Argued October 9, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 23, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee. Sixt Cari Kapff for appellant. William M. Mullen for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All coneur. STEPHEN G. CONDIT. Appellant, . CHARLES WAHLIG et al., Respondents. Condit v. Wahlig, 79 Hun, 613, affirmed. (Argued October 9 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 6, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special ferm. Joseph II. Hayes for appellant. B. F. Einstein for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. ROBERT WENT, Appellant, v. THE METHODIST PROTESTANT CHURCH of Williamsburgh, Kings County, et al., Respond ents. Went v. Methodist Protestant Church, 80 Hun, 266, affirmed. (Argued October 9, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 7, 1894, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and dismissed the complaint. H. F. Lawrence for appellant. William Erdman for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. IRA C. BLASIER, Appellant, v. THE NEW YORK Central and HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent. Blasier v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 601, affirmed (Argued October 12, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 23, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit granting a nonsuit. 73 M. E. Driscoll for appellant. Frank Hiscock for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. ASBURY LESTER, Appellant, v. THE MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND Lester v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 79 Hun, 479, affirmed. APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the James A. Deering for appellant. Francis M. Scott for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that plaintiff established no cause of action on the merits; no opinion. All concur. OTTO COOK, Appellant, v. THE MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND COM- Cook v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 9 Misc. Rep. 338, affirmed. APPEAL from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered July 12, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term dismissing the complaint. O. P. Buel for appellant. Francis M. Scott for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All concur. |