The fact that the defendant intended to restore the property stolen or embezzled, is no ground of defense, or of mitigation of punishment, if it has not been restored before complaint to a magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. Spurious Interpretation - Page 394by Roscoe Pound - 1907 - 386 pagesFull view - About this book
| California - 1872 - 698 pages
...or pay demands held against him. > 512. The fact that the accused intended to restore the property embezzled, is no ground of defense or of mitigation...of punishment, if it has not been restored before an information has been laid before a mag trate, charging the commission of the otfense. But actual)... | |
| California - 1874 - 712 pages
...offset or pay demands held against him. 512. The fact that the accused intended to restore the property embezzled, is no ground of defense or of mitigation...of punishment., if it has not been restored before an information has been laid before a magistrate, charging the commission of the offense. 513. Whenever,... | |
| California, Theodore Henry Hittell - 1876 - 986 pages
...to restore property no defense. SEC. 612. The fact that the accused intended to restore the property m Ry2 j F Ԯ) -e < ߎ ΕN v$ ̓( & ];ь d D n 8 Ϝ˖G4 ܬ u % ۼ | ,B an information has been laid before a magistrate, charging the commission of the offense. 13.513. Actual... | |
| New York (State) - 1881 - 242 pages
...demands held against him. 8 549. The fact that the defendant intended to restore the Intent to * property property stolen or embezzled, is no ground of defense,...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. § 550. A person, who buys or receives any stolen property, or any property which has been wrongfully... | |
| California - 1881 - 878 pages
...his own mortgage— ö Allen, 502. 512. The fact that the accused intended to restore the property embezzled, is no ground of defense or of mitigation...of punishment, if it has not been restored before an information has been laid before a magistrate, charging the commission of the offense. ,r Intent... | |
| California - 1881 - 806 pages
...1. State v. fieilly, 4 Mo. App. 392. 512. The fact that the accused intended to restore the property embezzled, is no ground of defense or of mitigation...of punishment, if it has not been restored before an information has been laid before a magistrate, charging the commission of the offense. 513. •... | |
| Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1883 - 840 pages
...malice, and tends to establish a premeditated design to commit the deed. (Id.) Intent to restore.] — The fact that the defendant intended to restore the...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. (Penal Code, § 549.) ted, though not charged on the record. (k) In another case, the judge in his... | |
| New York (State) - 1884 - 1000 pages
...in himself and another. (Van Cleef't COM, 5 CH Rec., 117.) § 549. Intent to restore property. — The fact that the defendant intended to restore the property stolen or embezzled is BO ground of defense, or of mitigation of punishment, if it has not been restored before complaint... | |
| 1910 - 688 pages
...quoted had been given, the court read to the jury section 549 of the Penal Code, which provides that the fact that the defendant intended to restore the property stolen or cmbczzkd constitutes no ground of defense or of mitigation of punishment if he has not been restored... | |
| 1885 - 392 pages
...Peo. v. Thomas, 3 Hill, 169 ; Peo. v. Smith, 5 Park., 490. § 549. Intent to restore property. — The fact that the defendant intended to restore the...magistrate, charging the commission of the crime. • § 55O. Receiving stolen property. — A person, who buys or receives any stolen property, or any... | |
| |