1. District attorney.- Under the constitutional laws the district at- torney is a county officer, and not- withstanding the fact that the salaries of himself and his assistants are to be paid from the treasury of the city of Brooklyn, they are not, within the in- tent of the Civil Service Acts, offi- cers of that city, nor are they subject to the civil service regulations appli- cable to positions under the city gov- ernment. People ex rel. Cram V. Taylor, 505.
2. Same. It is not practicable to ascertain the merit and fitness of the assistant district attorney by civil service examination, and his office does not come within the civil service pro- visions of the Constitution as inter- preted in The People ex rel. Mc- Clelland v. Roberts, 148 N. Y. 360. Id.
1. Mileage Book Act.— Chapter 1027, Laws 1895, requiring railroads to issue mileage books, was a valid exercise of legislative power and is not unconstitutional. Beardsley v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 256.
2. Sterling silver.- Section 364a, Penal Code, constituting it a misde- meanor to sell, or have in possession for sale, an article marked "sterling" or "sterling silver," etc., unless nine hundred and twenty-five one-thou- sandths of the component parts of the metal of which the article was manu- factured are pure silver, is not un- constitutional. People v. Webster, 410.
See Lien.
Mortgage. Railroads.
§ 14, subd. 4. People ex rel. Wise v. Tamsen, 212.
$757. Shipman v. Long Island R. R. Co., 102.
1. False justification as surety.- One who falsely justifies as surety on an undertaking given to discharge aa attachment is guilty of contempt un- der subdivision 4 of section 14 of the Code. People ex rel. Wise v. Tam- sen, 212.
§ 948. Bent v. Glaenzer, 569. § 1638. Walker v. Pease, 415. § 1639. Walker v. Pease, 415. § 2348. Craver v. Jermain, 244. § 2433, subd. 1. Levy v. Swick Piano Co., 145. § 2577. Matter of Arkenburgh, 543. § 3053. Lazarus v. Ludwig, 365. § 3064. Risley v. Van Delinder, 661. | ance. Id.
2. Commitment.-Where a person adjudged guilty of a contempt is fined or directed to perform some act within his power as a punishment therefor, the commitment need not specify the term of imprisonment for nonperform-
capriciously determine the question.
1. Services Waiver of ditions.-A contract between the gen- 4. Acceptance of order-Estoppel. eral agent of an insurance company -An owner of a building who, after and a canvasser provided that broker- agreeing to pay an order in favor of ages should accrue only as the premi- materialmen when the contract is com- ums should be paid to the company. pleted, abrogates such contract and A policy procured by the canvasser enters into a new one with the con- was delivered to the insured without tractor, cannot set up nonperform- payment of the premium, and was sub-ance of the first contract as a defense sequently returned to the manager by to his liability upon his agreement. him for change to another kind of Robinson v. Gray, 341. policy, which the manager agreed to have done. On an examination of the insured, however, the manager re- fused to issue a new policy or return the old one on the ground that he was growing too fast. Held, that the con- dition in the contract was waived by the agreement to exchange the policy, and by the failure to assert nonpay- ment as a ground for the subsequent refusal. Wheatfield v. Beal, 61.
2. Commissions.- Plaintiff was em- ployed by defendants as a salesman for one year for a commission of 21⁄2 per cent. on all sales made directly by him and of 12 per cent. on all such sales not made by him directly, but which defendants should consider to be the result of his original sales. Toward the close of the year they wrote him declining to continue the employment for another year, and stating, "We shall cheerfully allow you the commission agreed upon for last year upon any sales you may make and which we accept, but prefer not to make any engagement for any length of time or to pay beyond commission for orders which you may send us." Held, that the original contract was thereby extended so far as its commis- sion features were concerned, and that it was for the jury to determine whether sales made by defendants to parties whose custom plaintiff had ob- tained during the first year ought to be considered as the result of his original sales to the parties. Ransom v. Wheelwright, 141.
5. Performance.-Where there has been a substantial performance of a contract, and some item of work has been accidentally overlooked, a re- covery may be had for the contract price less the expense of completing the portion undone. D'Andre v. Zim- mermann, 357.
6. Liability of theatrical manager for baggage of member of troupe.- Upon the disbandment of defendant's company the plaintiff failed to tag his trunk or to see to the delivery thereof to the expressman, and upon his ar- rival at the railroad depot failed to find it. He thereupon started to go to the baggage car, but was dissuaded by defendant's contracting agent, who stated that if he would go to Wash- ington with the other employees, for whom a combination ticket had been procured, defendant would be re- sponsible for the trunk. Held, that while defendant was not primarily liable for the loss of the trunk, the agreement of the agent was founded on a good consideration and rendered it liable. McKay v. Buffalo Bill's Wild West Co., 396.
7. Services Waiver of con- ditions.-A contract between the gen eral agent of an insurance company and a canvasser provided that broker- ages should accrue only as the pre- miums should be paid to the company. A policy procured by the canvasser was delivered to the insured without payment of the premium, and was sub- 3. Reservation of right of de- sequently returned by him to the man- cision. A provision in a contract of ager for change to another kind of employment as sales agent giving the policy, which the manager agreed to employer the right to decide as to have done. On an examination of the whether sales not made directly by the insured, however, the manager re- agent were the indirect result of his fused to issue a new policy or return efforts and making such decision final the original one, stating that insured and without appeal, does not give the was growing too fast. Held, that employer the right to arbitrarily or there was no waiver of the condition
of the contract; that the company remote and fanciful sense, may fairly acted within its powers in accepting | be considered within the charter the surrender of the original policy | powers. Steinway V. Steinway & and refusing to reissue it or to issue Sons, 43.
a new one, and that defendant was not liable for brokerage thereon. Wheat- field v. Beall, 584.
8. Services - Theatrical agent.- Plaintiff, who was defendant's agent, procured an engagement for her at a theatre for a period of four months, but subsequently induced the man- ager thereof to release her for a period of eight weeks so as to enable her to appear at another theatre, his commissions to be protected by the manager of the latter. Held, that the transfer was procured by his efforts and that he was entitled to commis- sions on the latter engagement. Mayer v. Fuller, 611.
9. Consideration.-A tenant of the plaintiff being in default in payments for goods purchased conditionally of the defendants, the latter agreed with plaintiff that if he would institute summary proceedings and get posses- sion of the premises, so as to enable them to have a house sale of the prop- erty, they would pay him the amount of rent in arrear. Plaintiff accord- ingly brought summary proceedings and procured a warrant of disposses- sion, which he directed the marshal to hold, so as to allow the sale to be had, and notified defendants thereof. De-
fendants allowed the goods to remain on the premises for over a month thereafter and then removed them without having had any sale. Held, that there was a good consideration for their agreement and that plaintiff was entitled to recover. Dempsey Horner, 616.
See Agency.
Master and Servant. Power of Attorney. Sale.
Title Guarantee Companies. Towns.
2. Ultra vires.- Where a corpora tion organized under the General Manufacturing Act, for the purpose of manufacturing and selling pianofortes and musical instruments, has succeeded a former partnership engaged in the same business, acquiring with the other assets a large tract of land on which work was in progress for the erection of a large manufacturing plant and homes for employees, the continuing of such improvements is not ultra vires. Id.
3. Same. In such a case not only the erection of dwelling-houses for renting and sale to operatives and the regulation of streets, construction of sewers and supply of water, but also moderate contributions toward the establishment of a church, school, free library and free baths, are within the corporate authority. Id.
4. Expenditures.- Nor is the pro- priety of expenditures for such pur- poses on land not at present used, or which may not be needed for corporate purposes, open to criticism by a stock- holder, where such expenditures are advantageous to the property and tend to render it salable. Id.
5. Stockholder estopped by ac- quiescence. A stockholder cannot be heard to impeach corporate acts or ex- penditures in which he either expressly or tacitly acquiesced. Id.
6. Proof of incorporation Not admissible under general denial.— In an action for goods sold to a corpo- ration, the latter cannot show, under a general denial, that it was not incorpo- rated at the time of the sale alleged; to authorize such proof the answer must affirmatively allege the fact that the defendant was not a corporation. Schmidt v. Nelke Art Lithographic Co., 124.
7. Discontinuance of action brought by. Stockholders of a cor- 1. An act which is lawful in itself poration may vote upon a resolution and not otherwise prohibited, and to discontinue an action brought in the which is done for the purpose of serv- name of the corporation, although ing corporate ends, and is reasonably tributary to the promotion of those ends in a substantial, and not in a
they are interested in the result. Socorro Mountain Mining Co. v. Pres- ton, 220.
8. Election Transfer-book.- Where the stock-book and seal are withheld or concealed in order to pre- vent a transfer of stock in time to per- mit the new stock to be voted on at the annual meeting, it is lawful for the directors to adopt a new seal and stock-book to accomplish that purpose. Id.
9. Misconduct of trustees.- Where it appears that the corporation is wholly within the grasp of the trustees and its management is conducted for their pecuniary profit and advantage and to the destruction of the interests of the stockholders, the court will in- tervene to afford such relief as may be necessary. Watkins v. Watkins & Turner Lumber Co., 227.
15. Foreign-Corporate existence. Where the laws of the state under which a foreign corporation was organ- ized provide for the continuance of its existence after the expiration of the term of its charter for the purpose of collecting debts or claims due to it, its continued existence for that purpose must be recognized by the courts of this state. O'Reilly, Skelly & Fogarty Co. v. Greene, 302.
16. Certificate.-The procurement of a certificate pursuant to section 15 of chapter 687, Laws of 1892, is not a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action by a foreign corporation made without the upon a contract state or upon one made previous to the enactment of the statute. Id.
17. Pleading.- Procurement of the 10. Pleading. An action by a stock-certificate need not be alleged in the holder for relief against the miscon- complaint in an action by a foreign duct of the trustees, where an counting is asked, should cover all acts of the trustees, whether active or passive, which come within the pur- view of the mismanagement. Id.
11. Parties.- Where such an action is brought by an administrator who is also a beneficiary of the estate he represents, it is immaterial that he is not named individually as a party, as he will be bound personally by the judgment. Id.
12. Annual report-Verification.- Where the person elected as secretary
of a corporation refuses to accept office or act, but no action thereon is taken by the trustees, a verification of the annual report by the president solely as such officer is insufficient, al- though at the time he is also perform ing the duties of secretary. Shultz v. Chatfield, 264.
13. Same.- Where the verification is made by one who holds two offices, it should show that fact. Id.
14. Officers-Salary.-The fact that an officer of a corporation voted in favor of a contract giving him a salary for services does not render such con- tract void, but only voidable at the in- stance of the corporation, its directors, stockholders or creditors. Keans v. New York & College Point Ferry Co., 272.
corporation upon a contract made within the state, but the omission to procure it is a matter of defense to be pleaded in the answer. Id.
18. Elections Eligibility. One who holds the legal title to stock, but has no beneficial interest therein, is ineligible, under section 20 of the Gen- eral Corporation Law, to election as a director. Matter of Elias, 718.
19. Trustees. A trustee who, in spite of the protests of his cotrustee, votes upon the estate stock in favor of himself as director, thereby dis- franchising such stock, is guilty of a breach of trust, and will not be per- mitted to derive personal profit there- from. Id.
action by a policyholder which alleges 20. Pleading.-A complaint in an that by the terms of his policy the association was to form a reserve fund from its net profits and a percentage on assessments, to be invested for the benefit of the members; that on its reaching a certain amount the in- terest should be paid as a dividend to members of five years' standing, and that on its reaching a specified max- imum sum all future sums set aside as reserve on assessments should be divided between the members; that the association had not properly built up the fund; had paid over a large amount to the death fund, deposited large sums abroad, made no distribu-
tion of surplus, and was about to erect a large building, and asking for enforcement of the contract, suffi- ciently states a cause of action. Swan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n, 722.
21. Parties. In such an action the officers or directors of the association are not necessary parties. Id.
22. Demand upon officers to bring action. Such an action is one to en- force the performance of a contract made with the plaintiff by the associa- tion, and does not require as a con- dition precedent any demand upon the officers or directors to bring action, or that any previous efforts for relief within the association should have been made. Id.
23. Laws 1890, chapter 400.- It is not necessary that such an action should be brought by the attorney- general, as chapter 400, Laws of 1890, does not apply to such a case. Id.
See Abatement and Revivor. Assignment for Benefit Creditors.
be rendered against the plaintiff upon a counterclaim for a debt due from the assignor. Avrutin v. Hensel, 160.
2. Moneys paid by mistake.- Plaintiff's assignor sold a certain saloon to defendant, who retained from the purchase price a sum sup- posed by both to be the amount of a mortgage on the fixtures, and also $250 to be applied on the discharge of arrears of water rents, the balance to be returned. In fact, the mortgage was for a much larger sum, which de- fendant was obliged to pay. In an action to recover the overplus of the moneys retained on account of the water rents, Held, that defendant was entitled to counterclaim the excess of purchase money thus paid by him, to the extent of plaintiff's demand. Stern v. Newman, 567.
1. District attorney's expenses Claim must be itemized.-A general statement of traveling and other ex- of penses in a particular case, in a district attorney's account of expenses, is insufficient to authorize the board of supervisors to audit it; the items must be given. Matter of Pinney, 24.
Supplementary Proceedings.
2. Meals and traveling expenses within the county not allowable.-
1. Leave to sue in forma pauperis. Expenditures for meals and traveling
-A motion for leave to sue as a poor person is addressed to the discretion
expenses incurred within his county by a district attorney cannot be
of the court, and its determination charged to the county. Id.
will not be interfered with unless there has been an abuse of such discretion. Steinberg v. Rosenthal, 53.
2. Plaintiff cannot be required to join in undertaking.- The court has no power to require a nonresident plaintiff to unite with the sureties in an undertaking for costs. Ellensohn v. Haselbach, 92.
See Executors and Administra- tors. Set-off.
1. Debt of assignor of claim in suit. In an action breught by an as- signee, an affirmative judgment cannot
1. Right of accused to trial.— The state has no right to accuse an indi- vidual of crime and then hold him and unreasonably delay his trial. A delay of over two months is too long. Mat- ter of Klein, 107.
2. Commitment of female. It is the duty of magistrates, under section 1466 of the Consolidation Act, to com- mit females found in houses of prosti- tution or of assignation or frequenting the society of prostitutes to a reform- atory institution of the same religious faith as such persons or their parents, if practicable. People ex rel. Plot v. Poly, 162.
« PreviousContinue » |