Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, Volume 37 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 23
... respondent . Appellant , in his complaint , in substance , alleged : That on the 9th day of February , 1907 , he was in the employ of Zion's Co - operative Mercantile In- stitution , a corporation engaged in business in Salt Lake City ...
... respondent . Appellant , in his complaint , in substance , alleged : That on the 9th day of February , 1907 , he was in the employ of Zion's Co - operative Mercantile In- stitution , a corporation engaged in business in Salt Lake City ...
Page 26
... respondent is guilty of negligence as a matter of law , and that appellant , as a matter of law , is not guilty of ... respondent's employees were necessarily guilty of negligence in leaving the wrench on top of this stepladder under the ...
... respondent is guilty of negligence as a matter of law , and that appellant , as a matter of law , is not guilty of ... respondent's employees were necessarily guilty of negligence in leaving the wrench on top of this stepladder under the ...
Page 27
... respondent , as the ultimate employer , was liable for the alleged negligent acts of the two plumbers . There was considerable controversy as to whether the plumbers , in doing the work in question , were or were not under the direct ...
... respondent , as the ultimate employer , was liable for the alleged negligent acts of the two plumbers . There was considerable controversy as to whether the plumbers , in doing the work in question , were or were not under the direct ...
Page 29
... respondent . FRICK , J. On May 21 , 1908 , respondent herein filed his complaint in the district court of Salt Lake County , in which he in effect alleged that on the 16th day of April , 1908 , the ap- pellant herein had received from ...
... respondent . FRICK , J. On May 21 , 1908 , respondent herein filed his complaint in the district court of Salt Lake County , in which he in effect alleged that on the 16th day of April , 1908 , the ap- pellant herein had received from ...
Page 30
... respondent were , in substance , as follows : Respondent produced a deposit slip issued by ap- pellant , from which it appears that respondent , on April 16 , 1908 , deposited with appellant the sum of $ 2230.87 ; that on April 20 ...
... respondent were , in substance , as follows : Respondent produced a deposit slip issued by ap- pellant , from which it appears that respondent , on April 16 , 1908 , deposited with appellant the sum of $ 2230.87 ; that on April 20 ...
Contents
226 | |
238 | |
260 | |
290 | |
298 | |
304 | |
313 | |
330 | |
98 | |
99 | |
102 | |
116 | |
134 | |
148 | |
150 | |
158 | |
170 | |
188 | |
204 | |
207 | |
212 | |
334 | |
339 | |
384 | |
392 | |
410 | |
418 | |
428 | |
431 | |
540 | |
566 | |
581 | |
612 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession affirmed aforesaid agreement alleged amount answer Appeal from District appellant appellant's application authority bank bonds boundary line cause of action charge claim clerk Comp complaint conclusion contended contract contributory negligence corporation counsel court erred creditors deceased defendant defendant's district court dower duty entered entitled equity error estopped estoppel evidence execution facts fence finding foregoing FRICK Garfield County ground held Hepburn act instruction issue judgment jury land MCCARTY ment mortgage motion Ogden opinion paid party passenger payment person plaintiff pleadings possession probative facts purchase purpose question quiet title Railroad rails railway mail service reason recover referred respondent respondent's rule Salt Lake City Salt Lake County sheep statute STRAUP street survey taxes testified thereof tion transaction trial court trust deed Utah verdict Wayne County witness
Popular passages
Page 260 - Every agreement, promise or undertaking is void, unless it or some note or memorandum thereof be in writing, and subscribed by the party to be charged therewith, or by his lawful agent, if such agreement, promise or undertaking: 1. By its terms is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof ; 2.
Page 598 - No variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof is to be deemed material, unless it has actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits.
Page 602 - ... to ministers of religion, traveling secretaries of railroad Young Men's Christian Associations, inmates of hospitals and charitable and eleemosynary institutions, and persons exclusively engaged in charitable and eleemosynary work; to indigent, destitute and homeless persons, and to such persons when transported by charitable societies or hospitals, and the necessary agents employed in such transportations; to inmates of the National Homes or State Homes for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, and of...
Page 394 - When the death of a person not being a minor is caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another, his heirs or personal representatives may maintain an action for damages against the person causing the death...
Page 268 - An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property, or of an interest therein ; and such agreement, if made by an agent of the party sought to be charged...
Page 598 - Where, however, the allegation of the cause of action or defence to which the proof is directed is unproved, not in some particular or particulars only, but in its entire scope and meaning, it shall not be. deemed a case of variance. within the last two sections, but a failure of proof.
Page 534 - If there were no other legal obstacle in the way, the two judgments in favor of respondent ajid the one in favor of Snow which was conditionally assigned to appellant were, in our judgment, the subject of set-off. Whether mutual judgments should be set off and satisfied In that way. rather than by the ordinary method of enforcing them, rests largely within the discretion of the court to which the application is made.
Page 22 - It is well settled that, where there is uncertainty as to the existence of either negligence or contributory negligence, the question is not one of law, but of fact, and to be settled by a jury; and this whether the uncertainty arises from a conflict in the testimony, or because, the facts being undisputed, fair-minded men will honestly draw different conclusions from them.
Page 161 - The complaint must contain: 1. The title of the action, the name of the court and county in which the action is brought, and the names of the parties to the action; 2. A statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language; 3.
Page 468 - ... 1. Where it has been usually cultivated or improved; 2. Where it has been protected by a substantial inclosure; 3.