NAMES.-Lamport & Holt Line, 37; Los Angeles Ship Building & Dry Dock
Co., 60; Luckenbach Line, 59; Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., 46, (45); steam-
ship Lituania, (6); steamship Lusitania, (17), 17, 377; steamship Leviathan,
(20).
SUBJECTS.-Larger vessels encouraged by, but not product of subsidies, 23;
law, references to, see Nos. 21, 22, Digest-Contents; law, This is a Govern-
ment by, (34); law, present law defective, 14, (27); law, disapproval of, is
no bar to claiming benefits under, 27; loans for ship construction, see 20, IX,
Digest-Contents.
NAMES.-Matson Line, (31); Munson Steamship Line, 1, 12, 13, 14, 20, 37, 46,
48, 49, (46), (2), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (32), (33); Mississippi
Shipping Co., 47; steamship Mauretania, (17), 17, 37; Manila, see Philippine
Islands; Melbourne, (18); Miami, Fla., (7); Montevideo, (12); Moore Dry
Dock Co., 59, 60; C. A. McAllister, 57; Robert McAlpin, 56; Senator McKellar,
2, 3, 4, 11, 17, 40, 41, 42, 48, 50, 51, 52, 61; Senator Moses, 1, 2, 3, 4, 41, 42.
SUBJECTS.-Maximum rates awarded, 8, 16, (10); market values of vessels,
13, (14); merchant marine is a nonpartisan problem, (39); mid-west cities,
how interested, (22); modern vessels and equipment required, 49, 20, 23,
(16), see also 12, vII, Digest-Contents; "New vessels not required," (16);
"New vessels and replacements," 11, vi, Digest-Contents; monopoly in
bidding, 4, (3), see also 17 (a), vш, Digest-Contents; Matson proposal for
new direct postal route between San Francisco and Manila, see 18, VIII,
Digest-Contents.
NAMES.-New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co., 46, (46); New York & Porto
Rico Steamship Co., 15, 46, (27), (47); Nippon Yusen Kabushai Kaisha, 37;
New Zealand, 17; Senator Norris, 40, 41, 42, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53.
SUBJECTS.-Necessity for Government aid to shipping, see 10, vi, Digest-Con-
tents; New vessels not required by many contracts, 21, 23, 24, 53, 54, 55,
(16), see also New vessels and replacements, 11 vII, Digest-Contents.
NAMES.-Oceanic & Oriental Navigation Co., 14, 22, 23, 32, 46, 47, 49, (47),
(15), (17); Oceanic Steamship Co., 46, 55, (47).
SUBJECTS.-Operating agents of board not entitled to preference, (2), (23),
see also 17 (h), VIII, Digest-Contents; Obsolescence, see 10 (a), vr, Digest-Con-
tents; Ocean Mail Act, 1891, 19.
NAMES.-Pan American Line, see Munson Line; Panama Mail Steamship Co.,
54, 55, 47; Pacific Argentine Brazil Line, 14, 47, (48), (15); Peninsular &
Oriental Steamship Co., 39; Steamship Pan America, 13; Steamship Penn-
sylvania, (22), 54; Panama Canal, see Canal Zone; Philippine Islands, (2),
(29), (30), (31), (32); Porto Rico, (27), (39; Commissioner E. C. Plummer,
his criticisms of Senate Document No. 210, 31.
SUBJECTS.-Preferred treatment extended, (23); see also 17, vIII, Digest-Con-
tents; parcelpost, in relation to South Atlantic ports, 27, 29; parcelpost,
proposed increase of rates versus ship subsidies, 40, 50; Pacific coast
handicapped in competition for ship construction, 57, see also ch. 7, vi, Digest-
Contents; postal contracts in force February 1, 1930, tabulated, (41); postal
contracts for South Atlantic ports, see ch. 3, rv, and 19, IX, Digest-Contents;
postal rates for mail transportation, 7; postal contracts, subsidies in, 12, (12);
public benefits, subsidies justified only as, 20 (2), see also 10 (2), vI, Digest-
Contents; policy of Congress should be clearly defined, 20 (2); the merchant
marine involves nonpartisan business policy, (39); Postmaster General, state-
ment that these contracts are really not postal matters, (36), also, suggestion
that preference be given owners indebted to the Government, (35); Philip-
pine Islands, proposed new direct postal route, see 18, vi, Digest-Contents.
NAMES.-Red D Line, 58; Roosevelt Steamship Co., 47, 56; Royal Mail Steam-
ship Co., 38; Robert Dollar interests, (2), (29), (31); see also Dollar Steam-
ship Co.; Admiral Oriental Line; Rio Janeiro, Brazil, (7), (12).
SUBJECTS.-Reply by author of Senate Document 210 to criticisms by Commis-
sioner Plummer, 17; see also ch. 2, IV, Digest-Contents; reference to annual
reports of United States Shipping Board, 18, 21, 48, 49; references to laws,
see 21 and 22, 1x, Digest-Contents; reserver powers in the contracts, see 1 (c),
1, also 14, VII, Digest-Contents; Remedy: What is the remedy? (37); reason-
able time for bidding, etc., not given, 5 (4), see also 17 (d), vш, Digest-Con-
tents; reply to tabulation entitled Contracts let under merchant marine
act, 1928, 53, see also ch. 6, v, Digest-Contents.
NAMES.-South Atlantic Steamship Co., 24, 26, 33, 47, (48), see also 19, IX,
Digest-Contents; States Steamship Co., 14, 47, (49), (15); Steers Terminal
Co., (26); Steamship Schenectady, (6); Steamship Stockholm, (6); Steam-
ship Southern Cross, 13 (13); San Domingo, (27), (39); San Francisco, 21,
29, 31; Seattle, (29), (30); Shanghai, (29, (30); Savannah, Ga., see 19, IX,
Digest-Contents; Senator Swanson, (34).
SUBJECTS. Subsidies to ships, see 10, vI, Digest-Contents; subsidies very ex-
cessive, 21, 6, (8); subsidy in sales prices of vessels sold, 13, 19, (13); see
also 13, VII, Digest-Contents; subsidy in the postal contracts, 12 (12); south-
ern ports, discrimination against, 25, 30; southern commercial bodies, action
by, re Savannah contracts, 30.
NAMES. Tacoma Oriental Steamship Co., 47 (49); Todd Dry Docks Co., 59.
SUBJECTS.-Tests for determining proper subsidies, see 10, vi, Digest-Contents;
transportation contracts or subsidies 2 (1); transportation of mails, 16, 18,
(1), (29), see also 16, vIII, Digest-Contents; tabulation of sales prices and
cost of construction, 14 (15); tabulation of new vessels: (a) List introduced
by Senator Fletcher, 46; (b) letter alleging inaccuracies in it, 53; (c) see also
ch. 6, 5, and also 11. vII. Digest-Contents; titles of Senate Document 210,
see ch. 1. 1. Digest-Contents; trend of trade requirements, 20, 49 (17);
transportation requirements not duly considered, 5 (3), see also 17 (b), vIII,
Digest-Contents.
NAMES.-United States Lines, 47, 55, 63; United Fruit Co., 47; Union Iron
Works, 59; Uruguay (12).
NAMES. Steamship Virginia (22), 54; steamship Valkyrie, 37; steamship Van
Dyke, 37; the Virgin Islands (39); Senator Vandenberg, 8, 52.
SUBJECTS.-Voyage expenses, see 11 (a), vII, Digest-Contents; voluntary con-
struction, 23, see also 11 (e), vII, Digest-Contents.
INJUNCTIONS IN LABOR
DISPUTES
A SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ON THE BILL (S. 2497) TO AMEND THE JUDICIAL CODE AND TO DEFINE AND LIMIT THE JURISDICTION OF COURTS SITTING IN EQUITY, AND
FOR OTHER PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH
A MEMORANDUM ON THE SUBSTITUTE BILL
BY WINTER S. MARTIN
PRESENTED BY MR. THOMAS OF OKLAHOMA
FEBRUARY 17 (calendar day, MARCH 4), 1931.-Ordered
to be printed
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
INJUNCTIONS IN LABOR DISPUTES
The question of the injunction in labor disputes is of nation-wide interest. It is now in the Senate in the form of a bill reported from the Judiciary Committee adversely with a majority and minority report.
A subcommittee of that committee, consisting of Senators Norris, Blaine, and Walsh of Montana, have during the last three years conducted extensive hearings, have amended the original bill and made the minority report. The gratitude of the Senate is due these Senators for the diligent and earnest work done on this very complicated subject.
In view, however, of the differences of opinion developed, and the radical changes effected in the original S. 2479, a further independent study has been prosecuted at my request, the results of which are presented herewith. After analysis of both majority and minority reports, Mr. Martin and his associates propose an alternative and carefully drawn measure. This proposal is so fundamental and yet from an angle so new, with an apparent probable effect so eminently fair and desirable, that it is commended to the serious consideration of those in Congress and in private life who are interested in an effective remedy for the acknowledged evils accumulating from the continued abuse of the writ of injunction in labor disputes.
|