The Scientific RevolutionUniversity of Chicago Press, 2018 M11 5 - 256 pages This scholarly and accessible study presents “a provocative new reading” of the late sixteenth- and seventeenth-century advances in scientific inquiry (Kirkus Reviews). In The Scientific Revolution, historian Steven Shapin challenges the very idea that any such a “revolution” ever took place. Rejecting the narrative that a new and unifying paradigm suddenly took hold, he demonstrates how the conduct of science emerged from a wide array of early modern philosophical agendas, political commitments, and religious beliefs. In this analysis, early modern science is shown not as a set of disembodied ideas, but as historically situated ways of knowing and doing. Shapin shows that every principle identified as the modernizing essence of science—whether it’s experimentalism, mathematical methodology, or a mechanical conception of nature—was in fact contested by sixteenth- and seventeenth-century practitioners with equal claims to modernity. Shapin argues that this contested legacy is nevertheless rightly understood as the origin of modern science, its problems as well as its acknowledged achievements. This updated edition includes a new bibliographic essay featuring the latest scholarship. “An excellent book.” —Anthony Gottlieb, New York Times Book Review |
From inside the book
Page 9
... phenomenon, inviting readers to see whether the account is plausible, coherent, and interesting. 2. For a long time, historians' debates over the propriety of a sociological and a historically “contextual” approach to science seemed to ...
... phenomenon, inviting readers to see whether the account is plausible, coherent, and interesting. 2. For a long time, historians' debates over the propriety of a sociological and a historically “contextual” approach to science seemed to ...
Page 13
... phenomena; second, the depersonalization of natural knowledge: the growing separation between human subjects and the natural objects of their knowledge, especially as evinced in the distinction between mundane human experience and views ...
... phenomena; second, the depersonalization of natural knowledge: the growing separation between human subjects and the natural objects of their knowledge, especially as evinced in the distinction between mundane human experience and views ...
Page 18
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 19
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 20
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Contents
1 | |
15 | |
Two How Was It Known? | 65 |
Three What Was the Knowledge For? | 119 |
Bibliographic Essay | 167 |
Index | 235 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
air pump Alchemy Alexandre Koyré ancient Aristotelian astronomy Bacon belief bodies Book of Nature Boyle's Cambridge University Press causal causes century certainty changes chaps chapter Chicago Press claims clock conception Copernican culture Descartes Descartes's disciplines Early Modern Europe early modern period early modern science earth effects English especially essay example experience experimental fact factual Galileo historians History of Science Hobbes human idea intellectual intelligible Isaac Newton Johannes Hevelius mathematical matter mechanical accounts mechanical explanation mechanical philosophers Medicine mercury Merton Thesis metaphor microscope modern natural philosophers motion natural history natural knowledge natural philosophy natural world Newton objects observed occult orig Oxford phenomena philoso physical practice practitioners Princeton principles produced proper publ relation reliable religious Renaissance Robert Boyle Robert Hooke role Roy Porter Royal Society Scientific Revolution secure sense sensibilities seventeenth Shapin sixteenth social sources structure telescope texts theory things tion traditional ture University of Chicago York