Hard Power: The New Politics of National SecurityBasic Books, 2007 M03 9 - 336 pages Our ideas about national security have changed radically over the last five years. It has become a political tool, a "wedge issue," a symbol of pride and fear. It is also the one issue above all others that can make or break an election. And this is why the Democratic Party has been steadily losing power since 2001. In Hard Power, Michael O'Hanlon, an expert on foreign policy at the Brookings Institution, and Kurt Campbell, an authority on international security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explain how the Democrats lost credibility on issues of security and foreign policy, how they can get it back -- and why they must. They recall the successful Democratic military legacy of past decades, as well as recent Democratic innovations -- like the Homeland Security Office and the idea of nation-building -- that have been successfully co-opted by the Republican administration. And, most importantly, they develop a broad national security vision for America, including specific defense policies and a strategy to win the war on terror. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 73
Page xi
... challenge posed by the retired general above. This book grew out of a long friendship and a successful collaboration on an ... challenges confronting the nation now and in the immediate future. This book owes an enormous debt to several ...
... challenge posed by the retired general above. This book grew out of a long friendship and a successful collaboration on an ... challenges confronting the nation now and in the immediate future. This book owes an enormous debt to several ...
Page 2
... challenges, the electorate would choose “strong and wrong” over “timid and right” every time. (Here the analogy to Lincoln clearly loses relevance.) This essential conundrum helps explain repeated Democratic losses in national electoral ...
... challenges, the electorate would choose “strong and wrong” over “timid and right” every time. (Here the analogy to Lincoln clearly loses relevance.) This essential conundrum helps explain repeated Democratic losses in national electoral ...
Page 6
... challenge the uniformed services as well, taking a page from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld without going to the extremes that have characterized his tenure at the Pentagon. And finally, they would seek to emulate part of the broader neo ...
... challenge the uniformed services as well, taking a page from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld without going to the extremes that have characterized his tenure at the Pentagon. And finally, they would seek to emulate part of the broader neo ...
Page 8
... challenges of the disadvantaged and the intractable problems of global poverty—by suggesting that these were national-security matters. Even if often right, this line of reasoning created the perception that many Democrats were ...
... challenges of the disadvantaged and the intractable problems of global poverty—by suggesting that these were national-security matters. Even if often right, this line of reasoning created the perception that many Democrats were ...
Page 9
... challenges—from energy security to China's rise—that have achieved a new urgency whiIe attentions have been directed elsewhere. What is needed, whichever party prevails in the coming eIections, is a more sophisticated approach to this ...
... challenges—from energy security to China's rise—that have achieved a new urgency whiIe attentions have been directed elsewhere. What is needed, whichever party prevails in the coming eIections, is a more sophisticated approach to this ...
Contents
H A P T E R T W 0 | 47 |
CHAPTER THREE | 75 |
H A P T E R F O U | 119 |
HA P T E R FIVE | 137 |
HA P T E R S IX | 159 |
CHAPTER SEVEN | 185 |
CHAPTER EIGHT | 211 |
CONCLUSION | 237 |
Notes | 253 |
Index | 291 |
Other editions - View all
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt M. Campbell,Michael E. O'Hanlon Limited preview - 2006 |
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt M. Campbell,Michael E. O'Hanlon Limited preview - 2006 |
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt Campbell,Michael O'Hanlon No preview available - 2007 |
Common terms and phrases
accessed Afghanistan agenda al Qaeda American approach Arab armed forces Asia attacks Beijing benefits billion Brookings budget Bush administration Bush administration’s Bush’s campaign candidate capabilities cellulosic ethanol challenges China Chinese civilian Clinton conflict costs country’s create critical defense democracy develop difficult economic efforts election Energy Policy ethanol first foreign policy fuel future George W Bush global hard power homeland security Hurricane Katrina important improve increase initiative Iran Iraq Iraq war Iraq’s Iraqi issues jihadists leaders major Michael O’Hanlon Middle East missile mission moderate Republicans modern National Guard national security national-security North Korea nuclear weapons Office officials operations Pakistan Pentagon percent planning political poll President Bush presidential problem Qaeda recent region Republicans role Rumsfeld Saddam Saudi Senator soft power specific stabilization strategy Taiwan terrorism terrorist threat tion today’s troops U.S. military United Vietnam war on terrorism