Hard Power: The New Politics of National SecurityBasic Books, 2007 M03 9 - 336 pages Our ideas about national security have changed radically over the last five years. It has become a political tool, a "wedge issue," a symbol of pride and fear. It is also the one issue above all others that can make or break an election. And this is why the Democratic Party has been steadily losing power since 2001. In Hard Power, Michael O'Hanlon, an expert on foreign policy at the Brookings Institution, and Kurt Campbell, an authority on international security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explain how the Democrats lost credibility on issues of security and foreign policy, how they can get it back -- and why they must. They recall the successful Democratic military legacy of past decades, as well as recent Democratic innovations -- like the Homeland Security Office and the idea of nation-building -- that have been successfully co-opted by the Republican administration. And, most importantly, they develop a broad national security vision for America, including specific defense policies and a strategy to win the war on terror. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 30
Page x
... moderate Republicans—many of whom had been closely associated with the first Gulf War—were also worried about being marginalized from power. Their brand of competent pragmatism was not what George W. Bush favored in the defining period ...
... moderate Republicans—many of whom had been closely associated with the first Gulf War—were also worried about being marginalized from power. Their brand of competent pragmatism was not what George W. Bush favored in the defining period ...
Page xi
... Moderate and internationalist Republicans, too, find themselves out of favor and struggling to project a vision for how to handle hard foreign-policy matters that complements their well-earned reputation for competence and pragmatism ...
... Moderate and internationalist Republicans, too, find themselves out of favor and struggling to project a vision for how to handle hard foreign-policy matters that complements their well-earned reputation for competence and pragmatism ...
Page 5
... Moderate Republicans, for their part, want the GOP to be associated with Dwight Eisenhower, the soldier-statesman who kept the Cold War from turning hot; N ixon's opening to China; Reagan's call on Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this ...
... Moderate Republicans, for their part, want the GOP to be associated with Dwight Eisenhower, the soldier-statesman who kept the Cold War from turning hot; N ixon's opening to China; Reagan's call on Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this ...
Page 6
... moderate Republicans and independents might find a similar worldview appealing). This group believes that military force is often needed to defend the nation's interests, and that decisions about employing the American armed forces will ...
... moderate Republicans and independents might find a similar worldview appealing). This group believes that military force is often needed to defend the nation's interests, and that decisions about employing the American armed forces will ...
Page 7
... moderate Republicans already generally have a greater feel for the textures and tolerances of global politics than their traditional conservative, as well as more visionary or neoconservative, Republican colleagues. Nye was emphatically ...
... moderate Republicans already generally have a greater feel for the textures and tolerances of global politics than their traditional conservative, as well as more visionary or neoconservative, Republican colleagues. Nye was emphatically ...
Contents
H A P T E R T W 0 | 47 |
CHAPTER THREE | 75 |
H A P T E R F O U | 119 |
HA P T E R FIVE | 137 |
HA P T E R S IX | 159 |
CHAPTER SEVEN | 185 |
CHAPTER EIGHT | 211 |
CONCLUSION | 237 |
Notes | 253 |
Index | 291 |
Other editions - View all
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt M. Campbell,Michael E. O'Hanlon Limited preview - 2006 |
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt M. Campbell,Michael E. O'Hanlon Limited preview - 2006 |
Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security Kurt Campbell,Michael O'Hanlon No preview available - 2007 |
Common terms and phrases
accessed Afghanistan agenda al Qaeda American approach Arab armed forces Asia attacks Beijing benefits billion Brookings budget Bush administration Bush administration’s Bush’s campaign candidate capabilities cellulosic ethanol challenges China Chinese civilian Clinton conflict costs country’s create critical defense democracy develop difficult economic efforts election Energy Policy ethanol first foreign policy fuel future George W Bush global hard power homeland security Hurricane Katrina important improve increase initiative Iran Iraq Iraq war Iraq’s Iraqi issues jihadists leaders major Michael O’Hanlon Middle East missile mission moderate Republicans modern National Guard national security national-security North Korea nuclear weapons Office officials operations Pakistan Pentagon percent planning political poll President Bush presidential problem Qaeda recent region Republicans role Rumsfeld Saddam Saudi Senator soft power specific stabilization strategy Taiwan terrorism terrorist threat tion today’s troops U.S. military United Vietnam war on terrorism