From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 28
The Carterfone Decision , in 1968 , opened up the terminal equipment market to competition . The Specialized Common Carrier decision did the same for the intercity private line markets . The computer inquiry , which attempted to define ...
The Carterfone Decision , in 1968 , opened up the terminal equipment market to competition . The Specialized Common Carrier decision did the same for the intercity private line markets . The computer inquiry , which attempted to define ...
Page 71
The implications for this " law " for regulators , regulated utility and competitive entrants are vast both in terms of ... Theory of Monopolistic Competition Competition entering regulated utility markets tend towards monop- olistic ...
The implications for this " law " for regulators , regulated utility and competitive entrants are vast both in terms of ... Theory of Monopolistic Competition Competition entering regulated utility markets tend towards monop- olistic ...
Page 135
COMPETITION AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST-- WHAT JURISDICTION IS LEFT FOR THE STATES ? Kenneth A. Cox Senior Vice President MCI Telecommunications , Inc. I'm delighted to be here and to have a part in this distinguished conference and to ...
COMPETITION AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST-- WHAT JURISDICTION IS LEFT FOR THE STATES ? Kenneth A. Cox Senior Vice President MCI Telecommunications , Inc. I'm delighted to be here and to have a part in this distinguished conference and to ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
FIRST SESSION Regulation and the Utility Industries | 1 |
SOLVING THE INFLATION DILEMMA | 103 |
FOURTH SESSION | 111 |
27 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accounting additional adjustment agencies allowed amount analysis application average base basis believe capacity capital changes charges Commission common companies competition concerned considered construction consumer continue cost curves customers decision demand depreciation determine earnings economic effect efficiency electric utilities energy equity estimated example existing expected expense fact factor Federal firm fuel future going growth higher important income increase industry inflation interest investment investors Iowa issues less load marginal means measure method Michigan natural operating peak percent period plant possible present problems production Public Utilities question rate of return ratio reasonable recent reduce regulation regulatory requirements reserve result revenue risk structure supply telephone tion unit
Bibliographic information
| Title | Proceedings of the Annual Iowa State University Regulatory Conference on Public Utility Valuation and the Rate Making Process, Volumes 13-16 |
| Contributors | Iowa State University. Engineering Extension Service, Iowa State University. Industrial Engineering Dept |
| Publisher | Iowa State University., 1974 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 22 Aug 2006 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |