The American and English Railroad Cases: A Collection of All Cases, Affecting Railroads of Every Kind, Decided by the Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction in the United States, England, and Canada [1894-1913].E. Thompson Company, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 98
Page 4
... relations with you , and trust that you will ap- preciate our present situation , and will not do anything that will cause friction in future . We should not consent to arbitration without knowing more definitely what questions are to ...
... relations with you , and trust that you will ap- preciate our present situation , and will not do anything that will cause friction in future . We should not consent to arbitration without knowing more definitely what questions are to ...
Page 6
... relations to the company , could it be doubted that he would be liable to an action for damages , or to a remedy in equity ? If the language of the contract were doubtful , the maxim of construction that the law will assume is that the ...
... relations to the company , could it be doubted that he would be liable to an action for damages , or to a remedy in equity ? If the language of the contract were doubtful , the maxim of construction that the law will assume is that the ...
Page 11
... relation to the main line " was one of probable , or possible , danger to the public using the railroad , and to justify its determi- nation for that reason . " McKell v . Chesapeake & O. Ry . Co Defendant's VOL 42 R R R - VOL 65 AM ...
... relation to the main line " was one of probable , or possible , danger to the public using the railroad , and to justify its determi- nation for that reason . " McKell v . Chesapeake & O. Ry . Co Defendant's VOL 42 R R R - VOL 65 AM ...
Page 13
... relation with the railroad and therefore imposing more restraint than was contemplated by this contract of the railway company , which was really none at all . A kindred defense here made is that the contract was illegal because the ...
... relation with the railroad and therefore imposing more restraint than was contemplated by this contract of the railway company , which was really none at all . A kindred defense here made is that the contract was illegal because the ...
Page 16
... relation to the entire tract , and other direct damages resulting to the remainder through the taking , and the cost of improvements necessary to establish new means of ingress and egress , or otherwise necessary to enjoy the remaining ...
... relation to the entire tract , and other direct damages resulting to the remainder through the taking , and the cost of improvements necessary to establish new means of ingress and egress , or otherwise necessary to enjoy the remaining ...
Common terms and phrases
accident action Adams Express Co affirmed agent alight alleged appellant appellant's appellee Arkadelphia authorities baggage bill of lading Boston brakeman brakes cause charge Chicago Circuit Court City coal common carrier complaint conductor consignee construction contract contributory negligence corporation counsel County crossing damages danger death deceased defendant defendant's depot duty eminent domain employees engine error evidence exercise fact feet fendant freight held highway horse injury instruction interstate Judge judgment jury land last foot-note liability Louis motorman nonsuit operation opinion ordinary passenger person plaintiff plaintiff in error platform Pullman Company punitive damage purpose question rail railroad company Railway Company reasonable received recover refused road rule running servants shipment shipper side track sleeping car Southern station statute stop street car street railway Supreme Court sustained switch testified testimony ticket tion train transportation verdict witness
Popular passages
Page 158 - J., observed that in order for it to apply "there must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care.
Page 115 - All complaints for the recovery of damages shall be filed with the Commission within two years from the time the cause of action accrues, and not after...
Page 220 - Acts relating to train brakes, automatic couplers, grab irons, and the height of drawbars shall be held to apply to all trains, locomotives, tenders, cars, and similar vehicles used on any railroad engaged in interstate commerce, and in the Territories and the District of Columbia, and to all other locomotives, tenders, cars, and similar vehicles used in connection therewith...
Page 200 - The power and authority of regulating railroad freights and passenger tariffs, preventing unjust discriminations, and requiring reasonable and just rates of freight and passenger tariffs, are hereby conferred upon the General Assembly, whose duty it shall be to pass laws, from time to time, to regulate...
Page 28 - To do all acts and make all regulations which may be necessary or expedient, for the preservation of health, and the suppression of disease.
Page 585 - ... resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other equipment.
Page 98 - ... or any change in the mode of operating its road and conducting its business is reasonable and expedient in order to promote the security, convenience and accommodation of the public...
Page 538 - The former verdict or other decision may be vacated and a new trial granted, on the application of the party aggrieved, for any of the following causes, materially affecting the substantial rights of such party: 1.
Page 212 - The case was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs against both of the defendants, and awarded damages in the sum of $8,000.
Page 125 - A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee in the sum of $9,000, and the railway company and McEwen appeal.