Page images
PDF
EPUB

..

8

Co.

::.... 273

...... 841

::.......1118

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

.

.

[ocr errors]

.

.

.

.

.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Page

Page pier, Woodenbury v. (Sup.). ...... 817 Swezey v. Batavia, two cases (Sup.). ....1146 pingarn, Starr v. (Sup.). ......

. 1146 | Switzer, Raife v. (Sup.)................1142 pofford, Stuart v. (Sup.)...

903 Syracuse Lighting Co., Johnston v. (Sup.). .1132 pooner, Cartier v. (Sup.)...

....1

1120 Syracuse Lighting Co., Pirong v. (Sup.). .1141 purr & Sons v. Empire State Surety C Syracuse, L. S. & N. R. Co., Woodhull v. ......................1009 | (Sup.) ...

1150 Iquire v. Ordemann isunjinirin.

:1146 Syracuse Rapid Transit R. Co., McLaughlin Iquires v. Kissam (Sup.).......

373 v. (Sup.). ... tache, Keuthen v. (Sup.). ......... 198 Syracuse & Suburban R. Co., Doty v. Itaiger v. Klitz (Sup.)..........

1146 (Sup.) ....

.........1123 talbird, Fink v. (Sup.)......

1125 Syracuse & Suburban R. Co., Horstkotter tallo v. Humphreys (Sup.).............. 456 V., two cases (Sup.)....................1131 tandard Refrigerator Co., Carron v. (Sup.) ....

723 Talcott v. Moran (Sup.). .......

........1147 tandard Wine Co., Tyler v. (Sup.).... . 1148 Tallchief, Peters v. (Sup.).....

... 64 tanford, Benedict v. (Sup.)....

.1116 Tallman v. E. F. Goodrich Co. (Sup.)....1147 Itappers v. Interurban St. R. Co. (O

Tamblin v. Donely (Sup.)..

..1147 Ct. N. 1.)........................... Sot Tanner V. Eckhardt (Sup.)..... tar Co., O'Neill v. (Sup.).....

973 Taylor v. Bell (Sup.).......... tarrells, Simon-Lichtenstein-Pachner Co. Taylor v. Bennington Const. Co. (Sup.)....1147 1. (Sup.). : .........................1900

..1088 Taylor v. Kreischer, two cases (Sup.).....1147 ·

an (Sup.)............. tarr v. Spingarn (Sup.)................1146 | Taylor v. Lisman (Su

...1147 tate Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews Taylor v. Matteawan (Sup.)... (Sup..........:::::::::::..........

. 1146 Taylor v. Munro (Sup.)..................1147 tate, Fitzgerald v. (Sup.)...............

620 Taylor v. Thomas (Sup.)................ 338 tate Line Tel. Co. v. "Ellison (Sup.). ... 130 Teale v. Stoll (Sup.)... tate Realty & Mortg. Co. v. Villaume Terminal Ry. of Buffalo, In re (Sup.).... 655 (Sup.) ;:: isin

.698 Terminal Ry. of Buffalo, In re (Sup.).... 659 tephan v. Katz (Sup.)......

.

.1146 Terry, Searle Mfg. Co. v. (Sup.)......... 438 terling, Cramsey v. (Sup.). ....... ..1121 Thalmann v. Lewis (Sup.)......

..1056 tevenson, Agresta v. (Sup.)............1115 Theresa, Wakefield v. (Sup.)... tewart v. Woolley (Sup.). .....

| Thirty-Fifth St. & Fifth Ave, Realty Co., toll, Teale v. (Sup.)........ ...1118 In re (Sup.). ......................... 3

390 toneham, Lane v. (Sup.)...

...1134 Thomas v. Storm (Sup.)................1147 tone Valley Distilling Co., Hammerschick Thomas, Taylor v. (Sup.).......

538 y. (Sup.).............................

...1128 Thompson v. Buffalo (Sup.).... ...1147 tork, Smith v. (Sup.)....

...1145 Thompson v. Carpenter (Sup.)...........1147 torm, Thomas v. (Sup.). .

..1147 Thompson, Hoosick River Pulp Co. v. torr v. Central Bedding Co. (Sup.). ..... 546 (Sup.) ..............................1131 trang, In re (Sup.)....

..1146 Thompson, Mason V. (Sup.).... treet Between Bayview Ave. & Eldert Thompson Bonney Co. v. I. S. Van Loan Ave., in Fifth Ward, Borough of Queens,

Co. (Sup.). ......

...1147 in City of New York, In re (Sup.)......1146 | Thompson's Will, In re (Sup.)...... treeton, Flanagan_v. (Sup.)......... ..1126 Thornton, People v. (Sup.).....

704 trong v. Rutland R. Co. (Sup.)......... 85 | Tiffany, Brooks Bros. v. (Sup.)..... ..1118 trong's Saratoga Springs Sanitarium, Ha- Tiffany V. Ellis (Sup.)...................1147 thorn v. (Sup.).... 553 | Tiffany, Hosmer v. (Sup.).......

1132 trunsky v. Minsky (Sup.)..

1146 Tifft's Will, In re (Sur.)................ 362 tryker, Spicer v. (Sup.)...............1146 | Tilden, People v. (Sup.)...

247 tuart y. Špofford (Sup.)....

. 903 | Timbel v. Garfield Nat. Bank (Sup.).. 497 tudholme, Vio Chemical Co. v. (Sup.)....1148 | Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Levitt tudwell v. Palliser (Sup.)....... . 1146 (Sup.) .......

147 turges, Behrens v. (Sup.)............. 501 Title Guaranty & Trust Co., Dunbar turgis, People v. (Sup.)....

61 Sullivan Dredging Co. v. (Sup.)........ 180 ullivan y. Brooklyn Heights R. Co. (Sup.) 378 Tobin v. Quenzer (Sup.)....... ullivan, Colton v. (Sup.)...

939 | Tompkins v. J. & R. Lamb (Sup.)..... allivan, People v. (Gen. Sess. Ct.).. 143 Tooker v. Siegel-Cooper Co. (Sup.)....... 277 ulzbacher, Boskowitz v. (Sup.).......... 865 Tousey, Hastings v. sup.).,..

Tousey, Hastings . iSuo; sup.)....... 277

639 ulzbacher, Boskowitz v. (Sup.).......... 872

872 Town of Cheektowaga, Appeal of (Sup.)... 655 ulzbacher, Boskowitz v. (Sup.)..........1117 Town of Plattekill v. Lounsbery (Co. Ct.).. 139 ummit Foundry Co., Harvie v. (Sup.)....1129 Town of West Seneca, Appeal of (Sup.)... 6.39 upreme Council of Royal Arcanum, Mock Townsend v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. (Sup.)...

Co. (Sup.)............ .............. 381 upreme Court I. 0. F., McKeever v.. Townsend v. Pendleton (Sup.)....... (Sup.) ..........

Troy, Cahill v. (Sup.).......... upreme Court 1. 0. F., Rossenbach v. Trustees of Village of Saratoga Springs v. (Sup.) ::::::

Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. wann, Maris v. (Sup.)............. ...1136

up.) ...............................1118 wanson. Dolphin v. (Sup.)..............1123 | Tuck, Hiscock v. (Sup.)................ 700 weeney v. O'Dwyer (Sup.). ......... ..1146 Tucker v. Tucker (Sup.)...

.. 713 weet v. Sweet (Sup.)...................1146 | TU

...1146 | Turner V. Quillin (Sup.).................1148

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

.......1148 |

163 id Ha

....11491

... 503-17.

901

(Sup.)

[ocr errors]

..1143

Union Elevated ::....1068

and 140 New York State Reporter
Page

Page Tyler v. Standard Wine Co. (Sup.)........ 1148 Walsh, Markham y. (Sup.)....

.1136a T. Tyson v. Board of Education of New York Walsh v. New York Cent, & H. R. R. Co.

lon, P (Sup.) ...

(Sup.) ...

. 1149x0 .'

Walter, Neale v. (sup.)::::: ......1138_pt Ulmann, Boskowitz v. (Sup.)....

870 Walworth, Russell v. (Sup.)...

.......... 1143 Ulmann, Boskowitz V. (Sup.)....

871 | Ward v. Kennedy (Sup.)..

........1149 grad Ulster & D. R. Co., Ash v. (Sup.).

1115 Ward v. New York & E. R. Ferry Co. Sterne Ungrich, In re (Sup.).......

1051
L (Sup.) . ::::

.....1149-jén, Ungrich v. Ungrich (Sup.).........

1051 Warden_of City Prison of City of New St. Union R. Co., Glabman v. (Sup.)... 1089 York, People v. (Sup.)..

... 139. NO Union R. Co., Robinson v. (Sup.). ........ Warrick v. Lyons Nat. Bank (Sup.)......1149 5. Union Surety & Guaranty Co. v. Greater Warth v. Greif (Sup.)...

New York Amusement Co. (Sup.). ....... 1148 Waterford Electric Light, Heat & Powerb .
Union Trust Co. Hayden v. (Sup.)......1129 Co. v. Reed (Sup.)....
Unique Const. Co., Norton & Gorman Con Water Front of City of New York, In re T.
tracting Co. v. (Sup.)..

372 (Sup.) .......... ....;
United Electric Light Co., Floyd-Jones v. Waterman, Silver & Co. v. (Sup.).....

648 Waters, Morgan v. (Sup.)............... United States Health & Accident Ins. Co., Watson, Dexter V. (Sup.)........ Goodfellow v. (Sup.)..

Way, People v. (Sup.). ... United States Mailing Tube Co., Siegel v. Weber v. Credit Office (Sup.)....... (Sup.). .....

..1131 Wehrenberg v. Seiferd (Sup.)..... United States Mortgage & Trust Co., Lar Weick, People v. (Sup.)......

.1140 sen v. (Sup.)...

....1134 Weidenmann v. Bissell (Sup.). .... Utica Gas & Electric Co., Wilson v. Weil, Fifth Ave. Library Soc. v. (Sup.). .1125

.....,1150 | Wein, Beilin v. (Sup.)....... Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., Bonafede v. Weinstein v. Singer Mfg. Co. (Sup.)...... 517 Se (Sup.)

.....1117 | Weinstein v. Singer Mfg. Co. (Sup.).......5220

| Weinstein v. Singer Mfg. Co. (Sup.)......1149 Valois v. Gardner (Sup.).........

808 Wells, Bassett V. (Sup.)...... Van Deusen, Palmer v. (Sup.)....

707 Wells' v. Brooklyn Union Elevated R. Co. Van Druten v. Roff (Sup.). .....

1148

(Sup.) .. Van Gillurve v. Becker (Šup.).... 1080 Wells v. Brooklyn Union Elevated R. Co. Van Keuren v. Brown (Sup.)...

...1148

(Sup.) .. Van Loan Co., Thompson Bonney Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co., Oppenheimer v. (Sup.) 547

(Sup.) ...............................1147 | Weltfisch, Damsky v. (Sup.)............1137 Van Norden Trust Co. v. O'Donohue (Sup.) 948 Wendel v. Wendel, two cases (Sup.)......1149 Van Voorhees' Estate, In re (Sur.)...... 354 Westchester Traction Co., People v. (Sup.) 389 Vehicle Equipment Co., Consolidated Rub Westcott Chuck Co. v. Oneida Nat. Chuck ber Tire Co. v. (Sup.)................. 599 Co. (Sup.).......

.1016 Vestri v. F. W. Gesswein Co. (Sup.)......1148 Westervelt v. Mahony (Sup.)..

637 Village of Bronxville v. Seymour (Sup.).. 834 West, Kels v. (Co. Ct.)..... Village of Cedarhurst, In re (Sup.)...... 275 Wexler v. Yudin (Sup.).. Village of Ft. Edward v. Hudson Valley Whalen, People v.' (Sup.).. R. Co.. two cases (Sup.)...............1148 Wheeler. People

450 Village of Medina, In re (Sup.)..........1148 Whitaker v. Kilby (Sup.)....

511 Village of Phænix v. Gannon (Sup.). ..... 927 Whitaker v. Kilby (Sup.)..... Village_of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga White, In re (Sup.).....,

..1149 Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. (Sup.). .1148 White, American Fidelity Co. v. (Sup.)....1115 Villaume, State Realty & Mortg. Co. v. White, Clement v. (Sup.). .. (Sup.) .......

.. 698 | Whitefield v. Crissman (Sup.)....... Vines, Coward v. (Sup.)...

.....1121 Whitehall, McLachlin v. (Sup.)..........113 Vio Chemical Co. v. Študholme (Sup.)....1148 Whitten, In re (Sup.)....

1150 Virgilio, Saggese v. (Sup.)................1100 | Whyard. In re (Sup.).........

400 Von Pustau, Gerard v. (Sup.)..... 1126 Wilber v. Scatcherd (Sup.).......... Voorhees, Knickerbocker Inv. Co. v. (Sup.) 455 Wilcox's Estate, In re (Sur.). ....

468 Vredenburg, Barr v. (Sup.). ............. 1116 Wild v. Vredenburg & Co. (Sup.)... Vredenburg & Co., Wild v. (Sup.)........1150 | Wilhelm v. Fuller & Warren Co. (Sup.)....1150 Vulcanite Portland Cement Co., Moore v. Willard v. Ferguson (Sup.). .......

1150 (Sup.) ....... 393 Willett, Bumpus v. (Co. Ct.)............

366 Willey, Endress V. (Sup.)...............

726 Wade, People v. (Sup.)....... ........1140 | William F. Simpson Advertising Agency, Wakefield v. Theresa (Sup.).....

New York Evening Journal Pub. Co. v. Waldick v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. (Sup.).. 1149 (City Ct. N. Y.).......

850 Walker, Jones v. (Sup.)....

William P. Rae Co. v, Kane (Sup.). ..... 47 Walker & Williams Mfg. Co.. Martin v.

William P. Rae Co. v. Kane (Sup.)......1150 (Sup.) .............................. 708 Williams v. Citizens' Steamboat Co. (Sup.) 975 Walls, Kelsey v. (Sup.)........

575 | Williams v. First Nat. Bank (Sup.)......1150 Walsh v. Bergen Realty Co. (Sup.). ...... • 570 | Williams v. Riccadonna Hotel Co. (Sup.)..1150 Walsh v. Lispenard Realty Co. (Sup.). .... 570 | Williamson, McKane y. (Sup.)........... 92

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

..1108 .1149 • 434

. 1149

738 630

897

1150

....1149

[ocr errors]

....................

295

Page

Page Vilson v. Electro Dynamic Co. (Sup.). ...1150 Woodhull v. Syracuse, L. S. & N. R. Co. Vilson, People v. (Sup.).....

(Sup.) .....::::

1150 Wilson v. Utica Gas & Electric Co. (Sup.). .1150 Woods, In re (Sur.).

471 Finant v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Coast Woolley, Stewart v. (Sup.).....

99 Co. (Sup.). ......

. . 1150 | Wormser v. Gehri (Sup.).. Winograd v. Epstein (Sup.)...

..1150 Wren v. Kennedy Valve Mfg. Co. (Sup.).. 710 Wintermute, People v. (Sup.).............1076

..1076 Wright, In re (Sup.)..... .............. 369 Vintjen, McLaughlin v. (Sup.).......

. 1136 Wright v. Knights of Maccabees of the Wixted v. Nassau Electric R. Co. (Sup.). .1150 _World (Sup.)....

1150 W. J. Morgan & Co. v. Heitmann (Sup.).. 253 Wrigley ở. New York (Sup.)............ 812 Vood v. Flagg (Sup.).................. 308 Nood, Harbor & Suburban Bldg. & Savings | Yost, Bauer V. (Sup.)..................1116 Ass'n v. (Sup.)........................

173 Youker v. Youker (Sup.)... Wood v. Hoffman (Sup.)..

Yudin, Wexler v. (Sup.)...

.1149 Wood v. Luke A. Burke & Sons (Sup.)... 204 Yuengling v. Betz (Sup.)....

1151 Vood v. Scottish Union & National Ins. Yvelin, Schultz v. (Sup.).....

.1144 Co. (Sup.):..:::::::::::::::::: Woodbury, Andrew Jurgens Co. v. (Sup.). . 571

TURI,
| Zampino v. Bruckner (Sup.)...

...1151 Voodbury Inst., Hyland v. (Sup.)........1137 Zimmerman, Duryea v. (Sup.).

... 237 Woodenbury v. Śpier (Sup.)........ .. 817 Zolotorofe v. Sacoder (Sup.)..

...........1151

488

........ 810

[ocr errors]

... 940

See End of Index for Tables of New York Supplement Cases in Other Reports.

THE

New York Supplement

VOLUME 106,

AND

New York State Reporter,

VOLUME 140.

(121 App. Div. 376.) PEOPLE ex rel. LONG DOCK MILLS AND ELEVATOR v. WILSON, Deputy

and Acting Comptroller. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department. September 26, 1907.) 1. TAXATION-FOREIGN CORPORATIONS-CAPITAL.

A foreign corporation is not entirely exempt from taxation on the ground that all of its capital is employed in the state of its incorporation, and that money employed by it within this state is a part of its sur

plus. 2. SAME—CAPITAL EMPLOYED WITHIN STATE–WHAT CONSTITUTES.

Money of a foreign corporation invested in structures on leased ground is capital employed within this state under the corporation tax law, although the structures may become in law the property of the owner of the ground.

[Ed. Note.-For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 45, Taxation, $ 290.) & SAME--CAPITAL STOCK-SURPLUS.

A New Jersey corporation had a branch office in New York. The capital stock authorized by its charter to the amount of $25,000 was actually invested in New Jersey : the additional amount of $12,500 being invested out of its surplus in this state. Held that, for the purpose of taxation under the corporation tax law, dividends paid within the year should be estimated as paid on a capital stock of $37,500, and not on one of $25,000.

[Ed. Note. For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 45, Taxation, $ 634.]

Certiorari by the people, on the relation of the Long Dock Mills and Elevator, against William C. Wilson, deputy and acting Comptroller of the state, to review an assessment of a franchise tax. Determination of Comptroller modified, and, as modified, affirmed.

106 N.Y.S.-1

« PreviousContinue »