and 140 New York State Reporter could be obtained, held void.-Stewart v. Wool. utors and Administrators," $ 3. *A direction that the share of a certain child of rents and profits of land be held in trust for his life, remainder to his children, held void.- Stewart v. Woolley (Sup.) 99. Trust in will construed, and held invalid as suspending power of alienation.-Whitefield v. Crissman (Sup.) 630. 8 A devise to A. of corporate stock, the stock I to be held in trust for seven years after the death of testatrix, with a provision that on his death within the seven years without children persons, is valid ; the suspension of the absolute ownership of said stock being measured by the life of A.-Orange County Trust Co. v. Morri- son (Sup.) 940. PENALTIES. PERSONAL INJURIES. Defective condition of demised premises, see "Landlord and Tenant," $ 3. Explosion, see "Explosives." Operation of railroads, see "Railroads." $ 5. Operation of street railroad, see "Street Rail- roads," $ 2. Particular classes of persons injured. Employé, see "Master and Servant," $8 2-11. Passenger, see "Carriers," $$ 3, 4. Traveler on highway, see "Municipal Corpo- Traveler on highway crossing railroad, see Remedies. Bill of particulars, see "Pleading," $ 7. Excessive damages, see "Damages,” $ 5. Harmless error in rulings on evidence, see "Ap- peal," $ 8. Jurisdiction of municipal court, see "Courts," $ 3. Opinion evidence, see "Evidence," $ 5. Special findings, see “Trial," $ 5. PERSONAL PROPERTY. See "Property.” PETITION. PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS. Physician as expert witness, see “Evidence," $ 5. *Point annotated. See syllabus. PICKETING. cause of action as to one of the items claimed will not be sustained.-Babcock v. Anson (Sup.) 642. *A complaint in an action for the negligent death of an employé, brought against the employ- er and a third person, held to state separate causes of action against defendants within the rule requiring separate causes of action to be v. New York Contracting Co., Pennsylvania Ter- minal (Sup.) 880. $ 3. Plea or answer, cross-complaint, and affidavit of defense. *Denials on information and belief held prop- *Demurrer to answer sustained, where defend- answer as paragraphs of "this amended com- plaint."- Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. North Star Mines Co. (Sup.) 545. *Where defendant sets up separate defenses, express reaverment of other parts of the answer, or by reference thereto.- Walsh v. Lispenard Co., Id. *Certain evidence held not admissible under the answer pleading only payment.-Thalmann v. Lewis (Sup.) 1056. 8 4. Demurrer or exception. Complaint in equitable action not pleading delivery of shipment, see “Carriers,” $ 2. murrable.-Cozzens V. American General En- $ 3. *The allegations of a complaint must be tak- to.-People v. Luke (Sup.) 621. the answer is defective, held not sustainable.- ant,” 8 9. On demurrer plaintiff is entitled to have the facts stated in the complaint taken as true.- Shaw v. Feltman (Sup.) 1043. ings and repleader. In an action in County Court the court could permit plaintiff to amend the complaint by *The County Court being of limited jurisdic- Henneke v. Schmidt (Sup.) 138. *The power of the court, even after trial, to the proof, does not permit the importation into *Where a complaint is amended by inserting matter constituting a new cause of action, the *Point annotated. See syllabus. and 140 New York State Reporter cause of action alleges “the entire contents of folio one" of the complaint, the remedy for the (Sup.) 642. *The complaint to enjoin obstruction of a way *The court may allow a supplemental answer without authority to require a complaint to be § 9. Defects and objections, waiver, and aider by verdict or judgment. Defendant under the facts held to have elected PLEDGES. POLICE. *A verification by one of the defendants, with. See "Municipal Corporations," $ 3. POLICE POWER. see “Statutes," $ 3. § 5. POLICY. POLITICAL RIGHTS. POOR LAWS. POSSESSION. ant," $ 5. Of nortgaged property, see "Chattel Mortga- ges," $ 3. POUNDAGE. POWERS. Of attorney, see "Principal and Agent." c. 547, relating to powers, held not applicable ment to to transactions before its passage.-Wells v. PREJUDICE. peal," $ 8. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. PREMIUMS. For insurance, see "Insurance," $$ 3, 4. PRESENTMENT. ecutors and Administrators," $ 3. PRESUMPTIONS. In civil actions, see “Evidence," $ 2. In criminal prosecutions, see "Homicide," § 2. On appeal, see “Appeal," 8 8. PRIMARY ELECTIONS. "Executors and Administrators," $ 6. PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. dence," $ 3. execution, see “Execution," $ 1. see "Bills and Notes," $ 1. Agency in particular relations, offices, or oc- cupations. tors." Municipal agents, see “Municipal Corporations," § 3. § 1. Rights and liabilities as to third persons. *Where an agent employed to sell land failed to make a contract of sale binding on the own- ers, he was himself bound thereby.-Rowland v. Hall (Sup.) 55. *One applying to another for a loan to a third person on the latter's property held not liable for services in searching a title for the loan.- 147. *Plaintiff held not entitled to enforce a con- tract undisclosed principal.--Moore v. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. (Sup.) 393. afterwards modified by a salesman, the ques- tions whether he had authority to modify the as an and 140 New York State Reporter PROCESS. See "Corporations," $ 5. Foreign corporations, see "Corporations," $ 9. Particular forms of writs or other process. 8 1. Service. A written admission signed by the superin- process, since it does not identify, the process served in an action against a foreign insurance company.-McKeever v. Supreme Court I. 0. ment. *Under the facts held jurisdiction of a defend- ant sued under a wrong name was obtained, so *Under the facts held correction of a mistake Hirsch v. Camman (Sup.) 814. PRIORITIES. PROHIBITION. cating Liquors." PROMISSORY NOTES. See “Bills and Notes." PRIVATE ROADS. PROMOTERS. tion, see "Fraud," 88 1, 2. Rights of way, see "Easements." PRIVILEGE. PROPERTY. Names." Constitutional guaranties of rights of proper ty, see “Constitutional Law," $ 3. Licenses in respect to real property, see "Li- Protection of rights of property by injunction, Taking for public use, see “Eminent Domain." *Independent of letters patent, an inventor has by the common law an exclusive property the property of the general public.-Westcott Chuck Co. v. Oneida Nat. Chuck Co. (Sup.) 1016. PROXIMATE CAUSE. Direct or remote consequences of injury, see "Damages," § 2. Of injuries to passenger, see "Carriers," & 3. Of injury to servant, see “Master and Sert. ant," $ 2. |