The New York Supplement, Volume 106 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 33
Upon the reference the parties stipulated that the account of the administratrix showed that so much of the personalty of the estate of William Henry White as had been reduced to the possession of the administratrix was insufficient to ...
Upon the reference the parties stipulated that the account of the administratrix showed that so much of the personalty of the estate of William Henry White as had been reduced to the possession of the administratrix was insufficient to ...
Page 46
Plaintiff's husband rented certain premises from defendant S. as agent of a third party , and remained in possession until May 1 , 1905 , having given notice some time prior to that date that he did not desire the premises after that ...
Plaintiff's husband rented certain premises from defendant S. as agent of a third party , and remained in possession until May 1 , 1905 , having given notice some time prior to that date that he did not desire the premises after that ...
Page 47
The plaintiff was wrongfully in possession of the premises . The evidence does not disclose the use of any violence in her removal . She appears to have left the premises upon her own motion after her goods had been removed by the ...
The plaintiff was wrongfully in possession of the premises . The evidence does not disclose the use of any violence in her removal . She appears to have left the premises upon her own motion after her goods had been removed by the ...
Page 65
Held , that petitioner was entitled to possession of the lands as against defendant . [ Ed . Note . - For cases in point , see Cent . Dig . vol . 27 , Indians , § 50. ] 2. SAME - JURISDICTION OVER INDIAN RESERVATIONS .
Held , that petitioner was entitled to possession of the lands as against defendant . [ Ed . Note . - For cases in point , see Cent . Dig . vol . 27 , Indians , § 50. ] 2. SAME - JURISDICTION OVER INDIAN RESERVATIONS .
Page 66
It further appears that , while the petitioner was temporarily absent from the house situate upon the premises , the de- fendant broke into the house and took possession of the same . Up- on being asked to give up possession of the ...
It further appears that , while the petitioner was temporarily absent from the house situate upon the premises , the de- fendant broke into the house and took possession of the same . Up- on being asked to give up possession of the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
140 New York action affirmed agreed agreement alleged amount appeal Appellate Division application appointment attorney authority building cause Cent certificate charge claim Code Company complaint condition contract corporation costs counsel damages death defendant defendant's denied Department determined directed duty effect entitled evidence examination execution fact filed follows given granted ground held interest issue judgment jury justice land matter mortgage motion N. Y. Supp negligence Note notice objection obtained owner paid party payment person plaintiff possession premises presented proceedings purchase question railroad reason received recover referred refused relator respondent reversed rule sell Special statute street sufficient Supreme Court Term thereof tion trial trust witnesses York State Reporter