The New York Supplement, Volume 106 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 24
Joseph Nellis , for respondent . ROGERS , J. The premises in question , No. 40 Mill street , in the city of Watertown , Jefferson county , N. Y. , have never been used for the sale of liquors . On the 8th of August , 1907 , William W.
Joseph Nellis , for respondent . ROGERS , J. The premises in question , No. 40 Mill street , in the city of Watertown , Jefferson county , N. Y. , have never been used for the sale of liquors . On the 8th of August , 1907 , William W.
Page 45
Argued before HIRSCHBERG , P. J. , and HOOKER , RICH , MILLER , and GAYNOR , JJ . Timothy M. Griffing , for appellant . Martin T. Manton , in pro . per . HIRSCHBERG , P. J. The respondent was duly assigned as counsel to defend James W.
Argued before HIRSCHBERG , P. J. , and HOOKER , RICH , MILLER , and GAYNOR , JJ . Timothy M. Griffing , for appellant . Martin T. Manton , in pro . per . HIRSCHBERG , P. J. The respondent was duly assigned as counsel to defend James W.
Page 83
Clarence Lexow , for respondent . WOODWARD , J. The plaintiff is an abutting property owner and taxpayer upon the line of the defendant's street surface railroad , now in process of construction , and he brings this action to ...
Clarence Lexow , for respondent . WOODWARD , J. The plaintiff is an abutting property owner and taxpayer upon the line of the defendant's street surface railroad , now in process of construction , and he brings this action to ...
Page 101
George Fielder , for respondent the Attorney General of the state of New York . JENKS , J. I think that the intendment of the testator was an express trust in the executors , not a power in trust . Spitzer v . Spitzer , 38 App . Div .
George Fielder , for respondent the Attorney General of the state of New York . JENKS , J. I think that the intendment of the testator was an express trust in the executors , not a power in trust . Spitzer v . Spitzer , 38 App . Div .
Page 139
Atty . , for respondent . FORD , J. Relator is held under a commitment of a city magistrate after examination on a charge of felony . The crime charged is one in which by statute the testimony of the complainant must be cor- roborated ...
Atty . , for respondent . FORD , J. Relator is held under a commitment of a city magistrate after examination on a charge of felony . The crime charged is one in which by statute the testimony of the complainant must be cor- roborated ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
140 New York action affirmed agreed agreement alleged amount appeal Appellate Division application appointment attorney authority building cause Cent certificate charge claim Code Company complaint condition contract corporation costs counsel damages death defendant defendant's denied Department determined directed duty effect entitled evidence examination execution fact filed follows given granted ground held interest issue judgment jury justice land matter mortgage motion N. Y. Supp negligence Note notice objection obtained owner paid party payment person plaintiff possession premises presented proceedings purchase question railroad reason received recover referred refused relator respondent reversed rule sell Special statute street sufficient Supreme Court Term thereof tion trial trust witnesses York State Reporter