Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, in the Year ..., Volume 58Edward O. Jenkins, 1878 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 70
Page 12
... for against J. W. Lathrop & Co. , of Chatham county . The court sustained the de- murrer and dismissed the complainant's bill : whereupon the complainant excepted . Huff vs. Ripley & Tinsley et al . The alleged 12 SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA .
... for against J. W. Lathrop & Co. , of Chatham county . The court sustained the de- murrer and dismissed the complainant's bill : whereupon the complainant excepted . Huff vs. Ripley & Tinsley et al . The alleged 12 SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA .
Page 13
... state of facts as to show affirmatively that the court below erred in sus- taining the demurrer , and dismissing the complainant's bill ? Huff vs. Ripley & Tinsley et al . The answer ATLANTA , JANUARY TERM , 1877 . 13.
... state of facts as to show affirmatively that the court below erred in sus- taining the demurrer , and dismissing the complainant's bill ? Huff vs. Ripley & Tinsley et al . The answer ATLANTA , JANUARY TERM , 1877 . 13.
Page 15
... dismissing the complainant's bill , the judgment of the court below is af- firmed . Judgment affirmed . ELIZA C. WAYNE , plaintiff in error , vs. PROCTOR B. LAW- RENCE , administrator , et al . , defendants in error . 1. An ante ...
... dismissing the complainant's bill , the judgment of the court below is af- firmed . Judgment affirmed . ELIZA C. WAYNE , plaintiff in error , vs. PROCTOR B. LAW- RENCE , administrator , et al . , defendants in error . 1. An ante ...
Page 74
... refusal the securities excepted . The securities then moved to dismiss the suit against them on the bond , because , at the date of the commencement of Triest et al . vs. Watts & Bro . said 74 SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA .
... refusal the securities excepted . The securities then moved to dismiss the suit against them on the bond , because , at the date of the commencement of Triest et al . vs. Watts & Bro . said 74 SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA .
Page 77
... dismiss it on the ground that the amount claimed by the defendants as a set - off was more than fifty dollars , and , Houser vs. The State . therefore , an appeal was ATLANTA , JANUARY TERM , 1877 . 77 B. E. McDONALD, plaintiff in error ...
... dismiss it on the ground that the amount claimed by the defendants as a set - off was more than fifty dollars , and , Houser vs. The State . therefore , an appeal was ATLANTA , JANUARY TERM , 1877 . 77 B. E. McDONALD, plaintiff in error ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adm'r administrator affidavit agent alleged attachment attorney Banking Company Bibb county bill of exceptions BLECKLEY bond brought certiorari charged the jury Cherokee Iron Company Chief Justice claim claimant Code complainant contract corporation cotton counsel court erred court of equity creditors damages debt deceased declaration decree deed defendant excepted defendant in error defendant's demurrer dismiss equity evidence execution executor facts favor fendant filed garnishee Georgia granted ground Horshaw indictment issue JACKSON Judge Judgment affirmed jurisdiction jury found justice court land Let the judgment levied lien Macon mandamus ment mortgage motion was overruled offense opinion paid party payment plaintiff in error plea pleaded possession purchaser question Railroad and Banking record refused rule Savannah settlement sheriff sold statute statute of limitations sued suit Superior Court Term testator thereof tion trial trustee usury Vason verdict WARNER witness
Popular passages
Page 525 - ... the party of the first part. The party of the second part...
Page 252 - The third condition provided tliat " if the interest of the assured in the property be any other than the entire, unconditional and sole ownership of the property, for the use and benefit of the assured...
Page 551 - Where the common seal of a corporation appears to be affixed to an instrument, and the signatures of the proper officers are proved, Courts are to presume that the officers did not exceed their authority, and the seal itself is prima •facie evidence that it was affixed by the proper authority. The contrary must be shown by the objecting party.
Page 239 - If the plaintiff by ordinary care could have avoided the consequences to himself caused by the defendant's negligence, he Is not entitled to recover. But in other cases the defendant is not relieved, although the plaintiff may In some way have contributed to the injury sustained.
Page 220 - The code, §3066, declares, that "in every tort there may be aggravating circumstances, either in the act or the intention, and in that event the jury may give additional damages, either to deter the wrong-doer from repeating the trespass, or as compensation for the wounded feelings of the plaintiff.
Page 421 - ... any false representation by the assured of the condition, situation, or occupancy of the property, or any omission to make known every fact material to the risk, or an over-valuation, or any misrepresentation whatever, either in a written application or otherwise...
Page 539 - On the trial of the case, the jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict in favor of the defendant.
Page 17 - ... grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the said party of the second part, and to his heirs and assigns forever, all that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, &c.
Page 253 - Company and the assured, that this Policy is made and accepted in reference to the foregoing terms and conditions, and to the classes of hazards and memoranda printed on the third page of this Policy, which are hereby declared to be a part of this contract, and are to be used and resorted to in order to determine the rights and obligations of the parties hereto, in all cases not herein otherwise specially provided for in writing.
Page 22 - ED his said intended wife, for and during the term of her natural life ; and...