The New York Supplement, Volume 164West Publishing Company, 1917 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 8
... held , as to dilutions of acetic acid : " That the product made by diluting acetic acid is not vinegar , and when intended for food purposes must be free from harmful impurities and sold under its own name . " It also appears that there ...
... held , as to dilutions of acetic acid : " That the product made by diluting acetic acid is not vinegar , and when intended for food purposes must be free from harmful impurities and sold under its own name . " It also appears that there ...
Page 11
... held that it was proper for the court to direct by order that all the defendants claiming title file cross - petitions and have the question of title determined prior to the impaneling of the jury . Chica- go , etc. , R. Co. v . Miller ...
... held that it was proper for the court to direct by order that all the defendants claiming title file cross - petitions and have the question of title determined prior to the impaneling of the jury . Chica- go , etc. , R. Co. v . Miller ...
Page 12
... held that title to the part not taken might be proved before the commissioners for the purpose of estimating consequential damages and that such proof was irrelevant on the preliminary appli- cation to appoint such commissioners ...
... held that title to the part not taken might be proved before the commissioners for the purpose of estimating consequential damages and that such proof was irrelevant on the preliminary appli- cation to appoint such commissioners ...
Page 47
... held that the assessment , while not a lien , was fairly embraced within the terms of the covenant . The contract of sale in Lathers v . Keogh , supra , provided that title was to be closed as of 1st September , 1883 , in relation to ...
... held that the assessment , while not a lien , was fairly embraced within the terms of the covenant . The contract of sale in Lathers v . Keogh , supra , provided that title was to be closed as of 1st September , 1883 , in relation to ...
Page 82
... held by said plaintiffs and defendant should be deposited and held by the New York Trust Company , to be used and dealt with by a syndicate directed by the plaintiff Waters , who was designated as " syndicate manager . " The original ...
... held by said plaintiffs and defendant should be deposited and held by the New York Trust Company , to be used and dealt with by a syndicate directed by the plaintiff Waters , who was designated as " syndicate manager . " The original ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accord and satisfaction affirmed agreement alleged amended amount Appeal from Municipal Appellate Division Appellate Term April attorney Bank BIJUR Borough of Manhattan cause of action Cent claim Code commissions Company complaint concur contract costs counsel County creditors damages defendant's deposit Digests & Indexes dismissed EMINENT DOMAIN employé entitled evidence ex rel executed executors fact fendant filed granted held injunction injury issue judgment jury justice Key-Numbered Digests landlord lease liability lien ment Misc mortgage motion Municipal Corporations Municipal Court N. Y. Supp Note Note.-For owner paid parties payment person plaintiff pleadings premises proceedings proof purchase question railroad received recover rent respondent reversed Special Term statute street Supreme Court Surrogate's Court tenant testator testified testimony thereof tiff tion topic & KEY-NUMBER trust verdict witness York City York County
Popular passages
Page 646 - The several circuit courts of the United States are hereby invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of this act; and it shall be the duty of the several district attorneys of the United States, in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations.
Page 646 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act...
Page 587 - The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the loss directly and naturally resulting, in the ordinary course of events, from the breach of warranty.
Page 417 - ... (2) The provisions of this section apply to every such contract notwithstanding that the goods may be intended to be delivered at some future time or may not at the time of such contract be actually made, procured or provided or fit or ready for delivery or some act may be requisite for the making or completing thereof or rendering the same fit for delivery.
Page 586 - Where there is an available market for the goods in question, the measure of damages, in the absence of special circumstances showing proximate damages of a greater amount, is the difference between the contract price and the market or current price of the goods at the time or times when they ought to have been delivered, or, if no time was fixed, then at the time of the refusal to deliver.
Page 283 - ... who shall make it, or who shall assent thereto, shall be jointly and severally liable to the extent of such loan and interest, for all the debts of the company contracted before the re-payment of the sum so loaned.
Page 637 - Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any such contract or engage in any such combination or conspiracy, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor...
Page 145 - ... to appear and show cause why the prayer of the petition should not be granted...
Page 135 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as holder in due course.
Page 343 - From and after the last day of December, eighteen hundred and ninety-five, the appellate division shall have the jurisdiction now exercised by the Supreme Court at its general terms and by the general terms of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, the Superior Court of the city of New York, the Superior Court of Buffalo and the city of Brooklyn, and such additional jurisdiction as may be conferred by the Legislature.