Press on! press on! proud of your high estate,— Leave drones and upstarts to their sorry fate. But ere we bring this rustic sketch to end, Wrought not by muscle, like the toiling swain, Who thus his time and talents doth employ. Now, of the ladies may I say a word? Of those, I mean, of whom we've sometimes heard, A partner, helpmeet, counsellor for life. Thus may we see, through all life's varied scenes, In what alone concerns a life well spent. CHAPTER II. LIFE. O LIFE! what mystery thy birth enshrouds! O Soul! my Soul! speak out and tell me clear, "Be still and trust. In God we live, and move, And have our being; more we cannot know." In One all-ruling Power we must, we do May read in Nature's open book, need we So fraught with beauty, grandeur, light, and life,- But this, does this assurance give that we, And constant audience seek. "T is true, the words All doubt dispel; yet few, methinks, are there Who do not crave more light. Whence shall this come? Not, surely, in the grovelling passions of CHAPTER III. POETRY AN INSPIRATION: MR. STODDARD'S RATHER STARTLING ASSERTION TO THE CONTRARY. WHOEVER has read Sir Edwin Arnold's "Light of the World" will doubtless have observed that, in his introduction to it, Richard Henry Stoddard makes the rather startling assertion that what has heretofore been generally received as an admitted fact, that real poetry is an inspiration, is, after all, in his estimation, only “a delusion which was fostered by immature rhymesters to palliate their shortcomings and impart dignity to their trivialities." This would appear to be taking direct issue with the author of the oft-repeated epigram that "poets are born, not made," and he adds that poetry "is now as universally recog nized to be an art as painting, sculpture, or music, and the rules to which it conforms have been gathered from the practice of the masters and formulated into a system of critical laws, which not to know is to know nothing of poetry." Undoubtedly, what passes for good poetry, so far as sense and rhythm are concerned, may be composed without any special inspiration, but I am inclined to believe that in order to the production of the most perfect spirituelle character of poetry, the author himself must be inspired above any help from art or "system of critical laws," just, for instance, as a mere mechanical performer on a musical instrument, with little or no ear for harmony of sound, may touch every note correctly without the ability to thrill the listener like an Ole Bull or a Bischoff. Says Cicero, "Nascimur poetæ, fimus oratores." We are born poets; by education we may become orators. Let us hear also what the "Autocrat of the Breakfast Table" says of his experience: "A lyric conception hits like a bullet in the forehead. I have often had the blood drop from my cheeks when it struck, and felt that I turned as white as death. Then comes a creeping as of centipedes running down the spine; then a gasp and a great jump of the heart; then a sudden flush, and a beating of the vessels of the head; then a long sigh, and the poem is written. . . . I said written, but did not say copied. Every such poem has a soul and a body, and it is the body of it, or the copy, that men read and publishers pay for. The soul of it is born in an instant in the poet's soul. It comes to him a thought tangled in the meshes of a few sweet words-words that have loved each other from the cradle of the language, but have never been wedded until now. . . . No wonder the ancients made the poetical impulse wholly external-goddess, muse, divine afflatus, something outside always. I never wrote any verses worth reading. I can't. I am too stupid. If ever I copied any that were worth reading, I was only a medium." Undoubtedly the art of poetry may be acquired, but without that inspiration which comes to the aid of every true poet, what is produced is little, if any, better than rhymed prose. Emerson calls it "that dream power which every night shows thee is thy own; a power transcending all limit and privacy, and by virtue of which a man is the conductor of the whole river of electricity." As an appropriate conclusion to these hasty comments let us turn to Sir Edwin Arnold's proem preceding his beautiful poem: "The Sovereign Voice spoke once more in my ear: 'What shall I write?' I said. The Voice replied, 'Write what We tell thee of the Crucified!' 'How shall I write,' I said, 'who am not meet One word of that sweet speaking to repeat?' 'It shall be given unto thee! Do this thing!' WASHINGTON, D. C., May 10, 1891. |