Miller's Law of Freight Loss and Damage ClaimsW.C. Brown Company, 1967 - 427 pages First published in 1948 under title : Motor carrier loss and damage claims. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 83
... negligence breaks the line of defense so that the loss is not directly caused by the act of God , such is not a proximate cause , but the negligence is its sole proximate cause . The act of God is then only the condition on which ...
... negligence breaks the line of defense so that the loss is not directly caused by the act of God , such is not a proximate cause , but the negligence is its sole proximate cause . The act of God is then only the condition on which ...
Page 85
... negligence are involved is Baltimore & O. R. Co. v . Johl & Bergman , 177 So. 778 , and the following quotation therefrom is offered because of its excellent review of the leading federal cases : It is contended by the appellant that ...
... negligence are involved is Baltimore & O. R. Co. v . Johl & Bergman , 177 So. 778 , and the following quotation therefrom is offered because of its excellent review of the leading federal cases : It is contended by the appellant that ...
Page 252
... negligence , the Court did not discuss just what the carrier should have done to avoid liability for negligence other than provide refrigeration . There is an implication , however , that the carrier probably should have made periodical ...
... negligence , the Court did not discuss just what the carrier should have done to avoid liability for negligence other than provide refrigeration . There is an implication , however , that the carrier probably should have made periodical ...
Contents
Source of Carrier Liability for Loss and Damage | 1 |
B Carriers Liability Under Federal Legislation | 7 |
The Transportation Contract | 13 |
Copyright | |
35 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept act of God agent amount apparent good order Appeals applied arrived bill of lading burden carload carrier's liability caused Chicago claimant common carrier common law concealed loss connecting carrier consignee consignee's consignor container contents contract Court held Crail decision defendant defendant's delay delivering carrier delivery destination duty employees establish evidence facie fact failure filed freight charges full actual loss indicated injury inspection Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission issued jury loading loss and damage loss or damage market value measure of damages ment merchandise motor carrier N. R. Co negligence notice notify order bill original owner packages packed party person plaintiff possession public enemy purchaser rail carriers railroad Railway Express Agency reasonable receipt received recovery refused result rule shipment shipped shipper straight bill supra tariff tion title 49 transportation truck U. S. Code unloading warehouse