Miller's Law of Freight Loss and Damage ClaimsFirst published in 1948 under title : Motor carrier loss and damage claims. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page 158
tion . Further , in Hines v . Warden , 229 S. W. 957 , the Court held that where goods have been received by a warehouse and stored before their delivery to a carrier , the ordinary presumption of their good order at that time does not ...
tion . Further , in Hines v . Warden , 229 S. W. 957 , the Court held that where goods have been received by a warehouse and stored before their delivery to a carrier , the ordinary presumption of their good order at that time does not ...
Page 310
tion and Answer ” column appearing in Traffic World has answered this problem by holding that if the consignee actually realized a saving by making prompt payment then the carrier is entitled to this advantage .
tion and Answer ” column appearing in Traffic World has answered this problem by holding that if the consignee actually realized a saving by making prompt payment then the carrier is entitled to this advantage .
Page 397
tion after being informed of the carrier's disclaimer of responsibility as the result of investigation . It would not have been unduly burdensome upon Newtowne , and there was ample time remaining after such disclaimer , to make a ...
tion after being informed of the carrier's disclaimer of responsibility as the result of investigation . It would not have been unduly burdensome upon Newtowne , and there was ample time remaining after such disclaimer , to make a ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Source of Carrier Liability for Loss and Damage | 1 |
B The Bill of Lading as a Receipt | 20 |
B Beginning of Liability | 66 |
Copyright | |
25 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept action actual agent Amendment amount apparent apply arrived authority bill of lading carrier's liability caused charges Chicago circumstances claim claimant Commission common carrier common law condition connection consignee container contents contract cost Court decision defendant delay delivered delivery destination determine duty effect entitled established evidence Express fact failure filed freight further give given held holding indicated injury instances Interstate Commerce involved issued liability limitation loading loss or damage lost market value matter measure ment motor carrier nature negligence notice occurred original owner party person plaintiff possession present purchaser question rail railroad rates reasonable receipt received recover recovery refused regulations responsible result rule shipment shipped shipper sold specifically suit tariff tion transportation truck United usually York