Mr. Justice Black and His Critics
Tinsley E. Yarbrough, Arts and Sciences Distinguished Professor Department of Political Science Tinsley E Yarbrough
Duke University Press, 1988 - 323 pages
Many jurists give lip service to the idea that judicial interpretation of constitutional provisions should be based on the intent of the framers. Few, if any, have been as faithful to that conception as Hugo Black. As U.S. senator from Alabama, Black was a vigorous critic of the Supreme Court's use of the Constitution as a weapon against the Roosevelt New Deal. Once on the court he played a leading role in overturning those decisions and in attempting to establish for freedom of speech and other guarantees the interpretation he (and others) believe was warranted by the language and intent of the framers.
Late in his career, however, Black's commitment to literalism and intent led him to assume apparently conservative positions in civil liberties cases. In an era characterized by growing acceptance of the belief that judges should adapt the Constitution to changing social and ethical perceptions, many came to regard Black's position as unrealistic and irrelevant.
Tinsley E. Yarbrough analyzes Black's judicial and constitutional philosophy, as well as his approach to specific cases, through the eyes of Black's critics (such as Justices Frankfurter and Harlan) and through an assessment of scholarly opinion of his jurisprudence. The result is a stimulating and provocative addition to the study of Justice Black and the Supreme Court.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A Constitutional Faith
The Bill of Rights and the States
Blacks First Amendment
Blacks First Amendment Critics
The Flexible Clauses
Other editions - View all
absolutist accept action adoption agreed Amendment's appeared application approach asserted authority believe Bill of Rights challenged civil claims clause clear conception concluded concurring conduct conference Congress considered constitutional construction contention conviction course Court criminal critics decided decision direct dissent Douglas draft due process earlier early equal protection evidence example expression fact federal Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment's Fourth Amendment Frankfurter freedom fundamental given guarantees Harlan Ibid included incorporation indicated intended interests interpretation involved issue joined judges judgment judicial jurisprudence jury Justice Black Justice's language later legislative liberty limited majority meaning ment moreover natural never notes observed opinion person position principles privileges protection provisions question racial reach reading reasonable reference regarding regulations rejected rule safeguards specific speech stance standards statute suggested tion trial United University violated vote wrote