What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
A Treatise on the Law of Estoppel Or of Incontestable Rights
Melville Madison Bigelow
No preview available - 2015
A Treatise on the Law of Estoppel, Or of Incontestable Rights
Melville Madison Bigelow
No preview available - 2013
acceptance action alleged appeared applied arises authority Bank bill binding bond bound brought Brown cause of action cited claim conclusive consideration considered contract convey conveyance course court covenant damages debt decision decree deed defendant demand deny doctrine effect equity estopped estoppel evidence execution existence fact foreign former fraud further give given grantee grantor ground held hold intended interest Iowa issue judg judgment jurisdiction Justice land lease Lord Maine Mass matter ment mortgage notice obtained operate paid party passed payment person plaintiff plea pleaded position possession premises present principle proceedings prove purchaser question reason received recital record recover referred regard relation rendered representation respect rule Smith statute subsequent sued suit supra taken tenant term tion true United validity warranty
Page 349 - That the records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any state shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, Chief Justice, or presiding magistrate, as the case may be, that the said attestation is in due form.
Page 607 - The rule of law is clear, that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page 294 - And the said records and judicial proceedings, authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the State from whence the said records are or shall be taken.
Page 293 - Full faith and credit shall be given in each of these States to the records, acts, and judicial proceedings, of the courts and magistrates of every other State.
Page 98 - ... it must appear by the record of the prior suit that the particular controversy sought to be concluded was necessarily tried and determined; that is, if the record of the former trial shows that the verdict could not have been rendered without deciding the particular matter...
Page 353 - The records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any State or Territory, or of any such country, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, that the said attestation is in due form.
Page 118 - transit in rem judicatam/ — the cause of action is changed into matter of record, which is of a higher nature, and the inferior remedy is merged in the higher. This appears to be equally true where there is but one cause of action, whether it be against a single person or many. The judgment of a court of record changes the nature of that cause of action, and prevents its being the subject of another suit, and the cause of action, being single, cannot afterwards be divided into two.
Page 27 - ... where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page 296 - Another objection is that the act cannot have the effect contended for, because it does not enable the courts of another State to issue executions directly on the original judgment. This objection, if it were valid, would equally apply to every other court of the same State where the judgment was rendered. But it has no foundation. The right of a court to issue execution depends upon its own powers and organization. Its judgments may be complete and perfect, and have full effect independent of the...