A Treatise on the Law of Estoppel Or of Incontestable RightsLittle, Brown, 1913 - 857 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page xvii
... Bank of Monongahela v . Wes- v . Whiting 589 v . Wood 710 Balch v . Arnold 439 ton Bank of Old Dominion v . Allen 493 116 v . Shaw 38 Baldwin v . Hale 96 , 752 Bank of Santa Fe v . Haskell Co. Bank 55 v . McCrea 111 , 223 Bank of U.S. v .
... Bank of Monongahela v . Wes- v . Whiting 589 v . Wood 710 Balch v . Arnold 439 ton Bank of Old Dominion v . Allen 493 116 v . Shaw 38 Baldwin v . Hale 96 , 752 Bank of Santa Fe v . Haskell Co. Bank 55 v . McCrea 111 , 223 Bank of U.S. v .
Page xxii
... Bank of Ky . 523 Butterfield v . Smith 254 v . Seligman 610 , 611 , 637 , Buttrick v . Allen 290 641 , 699 v . Holden 127 Burk v . Hill 131 v . Lowell 751 v . Simonson 756 Bybee v . Oregon & Cal . Ry . v . Webb 615 Co. 376 , 387 , 389 ...
... Bank of Ky . 523 Butterfield v . Smith 254 v . Seligman 610 , 611 , 637 , Buttrick v . Allen 290 641 , 699 v . Holden 127 Burk v . Hill 131 v . Lowell 751 v . Simonson 756 Bybee v . Oregon & Cal . Ry . v . Webb 615 Co. 376 , 387 , 389 ...
Page xxiii
... Bank v . Bank of Al- v . Shibles 97 bany 522 , 530 , 688 v . White 87 Candee v . Clark 301 v . Lord 163 , 168 , 248 677 372 , 444 Candler v . Lunsford 372 v . Jackson 432 , 478 Canfield v . Smith 755 v . Lewis 254 Cann v . Willson 712 ...
... Bank v . Bank of Al- v . Shibles 97 bany 522 , 530 , 688 v . White 87 Candee v . Clark 301 v . Lord 163 , 168 , 248 677 372 , 444 Candler v . Lunsford 372 v . Jackson 432 , 478 Canfield v . Smith 755 v . Lewis 254 Cann v . Willson 712 ...
Page xxiv
... Bank v . White Chatauque Co. Bank v . Risley 392 Chatfield v . Simonson 633 , 635 , 774 Chauvin v . Wagner 652 Christmas v . Russell 239 , 281 , 297 , 299 , 309 , 335 , 337 Christopher , The 279 433 , 444 , 476 Chubb v . Upton 507 ...
... Bank v . White Chatauque Co. Bank v . Risley 392 Chatfield v . Simonson 633 , 635 , 774 Chauvin v . Wagner 652 Christmas v . Russell 239 , 281 , 297 , 299 , 309 , 335 , 337 Christopher , The 279 433 , 444 , 476 Chubb v . Upton 507 ...
Page xxv
... Bank v . Bartlett 745 Cobb v . Arnold 577 City Bank of New Orleans v . v . Curtiss 197 Welden 61 v . Fisher 360 , 362 City Ry . Co. v . Citizens R. R. Cobbey v . Buchanan 626 Co. 731 Coburn v . Goodall 170 Claflin v . Boston & A. R. R. ...
... Bank v . Bartlett 745 Cobb v . Arnold 577 City Bank of New Orleans v . v . Curtiss 197 Welden 61 v . Fisher 360 , 362 City Ry . Co. v . Citizens R. R. Cobbey v . Buchanan 626 Co. 731 Coburn v . Goodall 170 Claflin v . Boston & A. R. R. ...
Contents
482 | |
489 | |
495 | |
499 | |
509 | |
519 | |
535 | |
545 | |
100 | |
116 | |
225 | |
245 | |
278 | |
282 | |
292 | |
301 | |
316 | |
331 | |
337 | |
343 | |
359 | |
372 | |
380 | |
387 | |
393 | |
410 | |
418 | |
424 | |
449 | |
590 | |
597 | |
603 | |
631 | |
648 | |
663 | |
672 | |
681 | |
694 | |
710 | |
717 | |
732 | |
744 | |
761 | |
772 | |
783 | |
791 | |
809 | |
827 | |
Other editions - View all
A Treatise On the Law of Estoppel Or of Incontestable Rights Melville Madison Bigelow No preview available - 2022 |
Common terms and phrases
alleged Allen appeared assumpsit attornment authority Bank bill binding bond bound cause of action cited claim Clark collateral common law conclusive Conn contract conveyance conveyed court held Court of Chancery covenant creditor debt declaration decree deed defendant dispute doctrine effect equity estopped estopped to deny evidence execution fact favor fee simple feoffment foreign judgments former fraud garnishee grantee grantor Gray ground heir impeach indorsement Iowa issue judg judgment rendered jurisdiction jury land lease lessor liable Lord Mass matter ment mortgage notice Ohio St party payment Penn person plaintiff plea pleaded possession present privies privity proceedings purchaser question recital record recover regard replevin representation res judicata rule seisin Smith statute sued suit supra Supreme Court tenant testator tiel tion trespass valid verdict warranty Wend
Popular passages
Page 349 - That the records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any state shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, Chief Justice, or presiding magistrate, as the case may be, that the said attestation is in due form.
Page 607 - The rule of law is clear, that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page 294 - And the said records and judicial proceedings, authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the State from whence the said records are or shall be taken.
Page 293 - Full faith and credit shall be given in each of these States to the records, acts, and judicial proceedings, of the courts and magistrates of every other State.
Page 98 - ... it must appear by the record of the prior suit that the particular controversy sought to be concluded was necessarily tried and determined; that is, if the record of the former trial shows that the verdict could not have been rendered without deciding the particular matter...
Page 353 - The records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any State or Territory, or of any such country, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, that the said attestation is in due form.
Page 118 - transit in rem judicatam/ — the cause of action is changed into matter of record, which is of a higher nature, and the inferior remedy is merged in the higher. This appears to be equally true where there is but one cause of action, whether it be against a single person or many. The judgment of a court of record changes the nature of that cause of action, and prevents its being the subject of another suit, and the cause of action, being single, cannot afterwards be divided into two.
Page 27 - ... where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page 296 - Another objection is that the act cannot have the effect contended for, because it does not enable the courts of another State to issue executions directly on the original judgment. This objection, if it were valid, would equally apply to every other court of the same State where the judgment was rendered. But it has no foundation. The right of a court to issue execution depends upon its own powers and organization. Its judgments may be complete and perfect, and have full effect independent of the...
Page 281 - Folger's claim was not superior, would be to allow him to take advantage of his own wrong — his fraudulent agreement with Doutrick, with knowledge of all the facts concerning Folger's claim to the property.